Hey all,
So, we have a single instance of CF 6.1 installed on linux (no
clustering). However, we have multiple instances of the web-inf/*
directories. The server admin's don't know where they came from, or
what to do about them. They seem to be in subdomains or virtual
servers, but they're not cons
> So, we have a single instance of CF 6.1 installed on linux
> (no clustering). However, we have multiple instances of the
> web-inf/* directories. The server admin's don't know where
> they came from, or what to do about them. They seem to be in
> subdomains or virtual servers, but they're not
On 5/17/07, Dave Watts wrote:
>
> What's in those other WEB-INF directories? I suspect they don't contain the
> entire contents of the original WEB-INF directory.
>
Well, in one example, there are 19,195 .class files. Not as many as
are in the root web-inf, no. But, a sizable amount.
~~~
> > What's in those other WEB-INF directories? I suspect they don't
> > contain the entire contents of the original WEB-INF directory.
>
> Well, in one example, there are 19,195 .class files. Not as
> many as are in the root web-inf, no. But, a sizable amount.
Is that all that's in there, compi
Any chance you could qualify your claims that re-compiling is faster than
reading from the cached .class (even if there are 20k files in the folder).
Even with a small cfm/function i'd be VERY suprised if this is the case.
Perhaps you could enlighten me?
D
>> > What's in those other WEB-INF d
>From Brandon Purcell's blog
http://www.bpurcell.org/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=1031
On 18/05/07, David Stockton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any chance you could qualify your claims that re-compiling is faster than
> reading from the cached .class (even if there are 20k files in the folder
riginal Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 12:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Errant Web-inf directories
> Any chance you could qualify your claims that re-compiling is
> faster than reading from the cached .class (even if there are
> 2
> Any chance you could qualify your claims that re-compiling is
> faster than reading from the cached .class (even if there are
> 20k files in the folder).
>
> Even with a small cfm/function i'd be VERY suprised if this
> is the case. Perhaps you could enlighten me?
Other than telling you to t
> 10,000 files is a lot for a file system ...
Not really. Ten thousand files in the same directory, however, is. And
that's the problem, I think. Filesystems use directory information to find
files quickly.
Conceivably, CF could be changed to store class files in some sort of
directory structure
On 5/18/07, Dave Watts wrote:
> > 10,000 files is a lot for a file system ...
>
> Not really. Ten thousand files in the same directory, however, is. And
> that's the problem, I think. Filesystems use directory information to find
> files quickly.
>
Well, since our main web-inf directory has 114,2
10 matches
Mail list logo
