of CF sites on a shared box? I guess IIS
cant control the JVM, so no?
-Original Message-
From: DRE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 September 2005 22:09
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Idea for better hosting
Emmett,
Some simple math where we're adding $ instead of things that arent addeable
no?
-Original Message-
From: DRE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 September 2005 22:09
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Idea for better hosting
Emmett,
Some simple math where we're adding $ instead of things that arent
addeable
quantities like Coldfusion + Clustering + Affordable (WTF
What if I uploaded an infinite loop? wouldnt that still kill all
three servers in turn?
Probably, eventually.
Does anyone know if setting the isolation to high in IIS will have
any effect on the performance / memory of CF sites on a shared
box? I guess IIS cant control the JVM, so no?
Hi,
can you run CFMX on Windows Server 2003, Web Edition
i was told you cant, that it doesnt support it ?
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 29 September 2005 12:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Idea for better hosting
The original post
]
Sent: 29 September 2005 08:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Idea for better hosting
Hi,
can you run CFMX on Windows Server 2003, Web Edition
i was told you cant, that it doesnt support it ?
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 29 September 2005
such as SQL Server which require Windows 2003
Server std. But it cannot stop installing any 3rd party product.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Joel Nath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 September 2005 08:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Idea for better hosting
Hi,
can you run CFMX
In my dreamworld, I suddenly realized that perhaps someone has already
thought of this. So I searched for load balanced hosting and found 588000
results. Oops emmett, this bizzare dreamworld seems to occur in your world.
.. .
DRE
On 9/29/05, DRE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damn your insulting
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Idea for better hosting
Damn your insulting Emmett, Did you read my initial post? It would be a nice
dreamworld if people read carefully.
Have a nice day.
DRE
On 9/29/05, Snake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you
.
-E
-Original Message-
From: DRE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:01 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Idea for better hosting
thought of this. So I searched for load balanced hosting and found 588000
results. Oops emmett, this bizzare dreamworld seems to occur
: Idea for better hosting
thought of this. So I searched for load balanced hosting and found 588000
results. Oops emmett, this bizzare dreamworld seems to occur in your
world.
... .
DRE
On 9/29/05, DRE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damn your insulting Emmett, Did you read my initial post
Powweb does not support coldfusion hosting. Find the one that does.
-Original Message-
From: DRE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 5:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Idea for better hosting
Emmett,
Some simple math where we're adding $ instead of things
Actually don't. Topic closed.
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 5:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Idea for better hosting
Powweb does not support coldfusion hosting. Find the one that does
: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Idea for better hosting
Actually don't. Topic closed.
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 5:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
testing
it, but once it's ready, I will post an announcement to the list. We plan
to keep our prices fairly low.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Idea for better hosting
Hey, I just had an idea for you guys working at hosting companies.
Instead of just running each site on one server where its depenedent on all
the other sites workign well, why not load balance between 2 or 3 servers.
If you think about it, it shouldnt cost more because you'd be able to put
twice
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 29 September 2005 7:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Idea for better hosting
Hey, I just had an idea for you guys working at hosting companies.
Instead of just running each site on one server where its
depenedent on all the other sites workign well
-
From: DRE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 5:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Idea for better hosting
Hey, I just had an idea for you guys working at hosting companies.
Instead of just running each site on one server where its depenedent on all
the other sites workign well
underdeveloped database programming or other poorly written code.
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 5:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Idea for better hosting
The problem with that would be where to put the database. If the database
Message-
From: DRE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 5:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Idea for better hosting
Hey, I just had an idea for you guys working at hosting companies.
Instead of just running each site on one server where its depenedent on
all
the other
Mark, I know where the jrun message comes from, thanks but thats irrelevant.
Clients dont care why theres a jrun message. They just are pissed that there
is one and that there isnt a site.
Its an extremely competitive market and any differentiation can be the
difference between breaking even and
Mark A Kruger wrote:
In addition, the margins on hosting are
very small - and you just added extra admin :)
-Mark
This would be my comment as well. Hosting is a tough, tough market. It
could take up to 2 years for a hosting company to see ROI on it's server
investments. The last thing we
The original post is set in some bizarre dream world. Clustering bad code
just means bad code running on 3 servers.
Let's look at the costs anyway. We'll cut corners when we can and look at
sticky sessions on standard cf licenses too.
---WINDOWS---
Servers x 3 $4200 - $6600
Windows
22 matches
Mail list logo
