Me, I deliver unencrypted code and address any issues I have with code
ownership at the contractual level prior to commencement. As has been
pointed out and is well known, unencrypting code is child's play. While
decrypting an encrypted script clearly puts the coder in a better legal
position...
The point I was trying to make is the Australia New Zealand Food
Authority is the owner of the Intellectual Property and when the
handover is completed we do NOT want encrypted templates. As it is the
provider disbanded their web development arm in its entirety. Most of us
are aware of the (illega
[finding the future in the past, passing the future in the present]
[connecting people, places and things]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:58:07 EDT
Subject: Re: Intellectual Property (warning)
> Really? Have you written anything worthwh
Subject: RE: Intellectual Property (warning)
where can I find documentation to back your statement?
> Encrypting the CF code even in the weak built in encryption is
> a performance hit.
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the offic
Really? Have you written anything worthwhile?
Just kidding!
Cheers,
Bill
In a message dated 8/20/01 3:37:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> And for anyone that steals your code verbatim, good luck trying to
> prove it is yours... I have had folks borrow mine plenty t
PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Intellectual Property (warning)
Encrypting code grants one addition protection under chapture 12 of the
Copyright Act. Encryption would be considered a software protection
mechcanism and circumvention could result in procesuction under the NET
act
($500,000 fine and 3 y
On the other hand, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to
"decompile" binary code. As such, I feel that it is a better model for
"protection". Rather than attempt to "hide" your code, you bypass your
source code altogether. Not to mention the benefit that n-tier
development gives you
ure in the present]
[connecting people, places and things]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:10:11 EDT
Subject: Re: Intellectual Property (warning)
> Encrypting code grants one addition protection under chapture 12 of
> the
> Copyright Act.
where can I find documentation to back your statement?
> Encrypting the CF code even in the weak built in encryption is
> a performance hit.
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/
ED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:54 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual Property (warning)
Just as an add on in support of not encrypting CF code, but finding an
alternative, Encrypting the CF code even in the weak built in encryption
is a performance hit. Now before the CF server can do it&
Encrypting code grants one addition protection under chapture 12 of the
Copyright Act. Encryption would be considered a software protection
mechcanism and circumvention could result in procesuction under the NET act
($500,000 fine and 3 years?) or additional civil action beside straight
copyri
.com <http://www.red-omega.com>
What does Snoop Dogg use to do his laundry? Blee-otch!
-Original Message-
From: Billy Cravens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual Property (warning)
Do a quick search on Yahoo! for &q
IL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Intellectual Property (warning)
At 09:08 AM 08/20/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Why would you use encrypted templates? If they're custom ta
At 09:08 AM 08/20/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Why would you use encrypted templates? If they're custom tags you
>pulled off of Developer's Exchange, consider whether or not you could
>duplicate the functionality. If you're encrypting code you wrote in
>order to "protect" it, this is silly. Easily d
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 6:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: Intellectual Property (warning)
I've just experienced a "joyful" situation where one of the largest
local ISP's sacked ALL of their web developers.
Problem is with "Intellectual Property
1. Unencrypt it.
2.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 7:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: Intellectual Property (warning)
I've just experienced a "joyful" situation where one of the largest local
ISP's sac
I've just experienced a "joyful" situation where one of the largest local
ISP's sacked ALL of their web developers.
Problem is with "Intellectual Property". Australian developers who deal with
the Commonwealth would understand this.
The company I am contracted to are withholding payment (to the
17 matches
Mail list logo
