Jave Image Manipulation Quality

I know there are some of you out there who have been unhappy with the quality of images produced by the available java manipulation libraries, although the Alagad image component seems to do a fine job. I've been toying with various methods and pouring over java documentation the last 24 hours

RE: Jave Image Manipulation Quality

: Jave Image Manipulation Quality I know there are some of you out there who have been unhappy with the quality of images produced by the available java manipulation libraries, although the Alagad image component seems to do a fine job. I've been toying with various methods and pouring over java

Re: Jave Image Manipulation Quality

Andy Matthews wrote: Rick... SMALL Nearest: 5,580 Bicubic: 5,566 Explicit: 28,309 So while the final image looks better, it's because less image data is being thrown away. The best test would be to get the quality of image generated by the explicit code as close as possible to the

Re: Jave Image Manipulation Quality

Rick Root wrote: Andy Matthews wrote: Rick... SMALL Nearest: 5,580 Bicubic: 5,566 Explicit: 28,309 So while the final image looks better, it's because less image data is being thrown away. The best test would be to get the quality of image generated by the explicit code as close as possible