At 10:51 AM 7/28/03, you wrote:
>A lot of the browsers use their browser in. Standards mode means the browser tries to render
>Standards compliant. Quirks Mode means that it tries to render it the way
>it used to.
>
>A listing of the various modes and browser compliance can be found at:
>http://
A lot of the browsers use http://www.hut.fi/~hsivonen/doctype.html
>Yeah NS 7.1 is pretty good, however I just discovered a quirk last night
>regarding CSS.
>
>I've got a major CSS file that sets padding, and a host of other elements
>in tables. When I generated the page using the "-//W3C//DTD
>Did you validate your HTML in both cases?
>Why not write XHTML?
Jochem,
Thanks for asking me why not XHTML... I've done some reading up on it and
yeah, it's pretty clear that I need to start learning this as well!
~|
Archi
At 06:22 AM 7/28/03, you wrote:
>http://www.css-discuss.org
Excellent resource - thanks for posting this! After all these years in
this industry, just now getting past my knees in CSS as a consistent
solution feels both awkward and comfortable at the same time!
~~~
http://www.css-discuss.org
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Alan Bleiweiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 8:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Netscape 7.1
Well, I did validate html and it's all clear.
Why not XHTML? Cause I'm just now teaching mys
Well, I did validate html and it's all clear.
Why not XHTML? Cause I'm just now teaching myself enough about CSS to
become proficient in it. Haven't even begun to explore XHTML. I did find
out that my in HTML 4 but not in 3.2, they will be ignored in 3.2 but
>rendered in 4. That is intended b
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3074031.stm
> Saw this on another list re netscape's future
> http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2003c.html#t20030715
>
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?foru
Saw this on another list re netscape's future
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2003c.html#t20030715
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 6:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Netscape 7.1
Rafael Alan Bleiweiss
Rafael Alan Bleiweiss wrote:
> Yeah NS 7.1 is pretty good, however I just discovered a quirk last night
> regarding CSS.
>
> I've got a major CSS file that sets padding, and a host of other elements
> in tables. When I generated the page using the "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Final//EN"> My main nav
Yeah NS 7.1 is pretty good, however I just discovered a quirk last night
regarding CSS.
I've got a major CSS file that sets padding, and a host of other elements
in tables. When I generated the page using the My main navigation table in NS 7.1 had a
gap in it, not in IE though.
I decided to
Lil bit OT but it may be worthy. ;)
I had to do some regression testing on an app today and was forced to
install Netscape 7.1, ACK!...and I must admit I was pleasantly
surprised. I believe it's *finally* caught up to (and surpassed) IE.
Built-in pop-up blocking for one...and every IE feature I us
11 matches
Mail list logo
