RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-15 Thread Kevin Aebig
Geez Mike, how many lists are you on anyways? =] Cheers, Kevin -Original Message- From: Mike Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 11, 2005 2:10 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex ActionScript 2 is based on ECMA script. We didn't define ECMA script (at

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-11 Thread dave
--- From: John Olmstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:31 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex >> What Bryan was asking Laszlo for was a collection of example using CF >> with a Laszlo app. None of the demos provide that, so he

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-11 Thread dave
ED]> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:33 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex > Laszlo also doesnt support the same type of customization especially > with components that flex does so if you need a completely custom or > fitting look then flex is the choice. As sof

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-11 Thread dave
al to form a corporation." From: P T Withington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:31 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex >That seems to say to me that it is based on ECMA script (as is AS2) but >deviates from it in a numbe

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-11 Thread Mike Chambers
ActionScript 2 is based on ECMA script. We didn't define ECMA script (at least not by ourselves, as we are currently on the working group). mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] P T Withington wrote: > AS2 is based on ECMAScript, but is a proprietary language because it is > defined by Macromedia,

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-11 Thread P T Withington
>That seems to say to me that it is based on ECMA script (as is AS2) but >deviates from it in a number of ways. Laszlo's scripting language is ECMAScript (not a proprietary language, as you stated in your original post). The 'deviations' you note are bugs. Bugs don't make a proprietary languag

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-11 Thread Douglas Knudsen
that calendar tool example simply rawks! I have heard several in the Flex community wanting one of those :) DK On 8/11/05, John Olmstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Laszlo also doesnt support the same type of customization especially > > with components that flex does so if you need a comple

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-11 Thread Jim Campbell
Something else to take into account... If you're working with the OpenLaszlo server deployment via a servlet container or enterprise Java server, you should be able to access CFC methods directly from a Java class through the new CFCProxy doodad once Merrimack is out. I think. - Jim John Olms

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-11 Thread Bryan Stevenson
> That said, I have not developed in ColdFusion for some years, and > currently do not own a license for the server, so I am not able to provide > any examples. However, I do know that ColdFusion provides tags to perform > all of the necessary functions. There are many good tutorials on > Col

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-11 Thread John Olmstead
> Laszlo also doesnt support the same type of customization especially > with components that flex does so if you need a completely custom or > fitting look then flex is the choice. As software engineer and a member of the team that built Earthlink's new Laszlo based web mail product (now in Be

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-11 Thread John Olmstead
>> What Bryan was asking Laszlo for was a collection of example using CF >> with a Laszlo app. None of the demos provide that, so he's asked them to >> work some up and send them out. > I think I can help Bryan out here. Laszlo was built primarily for the presentation layer of application deve

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-05 Thread Bryan Stevenson
> What Bryan was asking Laszlo for was a collection of example using CF > with a Laszlo app. None of the demos provide that, so he's asked them to > work some up and send them out. Thanks Kenand yes...I'm still waitinganybody...Bueller!! ;-) Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP & Director of E-Co

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-05 Thread Ken Ferguson
What Bryan was asking Laszlo for was a collection of example using CF with a Laszlo app. None of the demos provide that, so he's asked them to work some up and send them out. Douglas Knudsen wrote: >am I missing something here? >http://www.laszlosystems.com/demos/ >all teh demos have source cod

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Douglas Knudsen
am I missing something here? http://www.laszlosystems.com/demos/ all teh demos have source code available. DK On 8/4/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For those waiting for Lazlo code samples..well so am Istill no mail > from Lazlo Systems, but they did say they'd need to p

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Bryan Stevenson
For those waiting for Lazlo code samples..well so am Istill no mail from Lazlo Systems, but they did say they'd need to put together the samples from parts of the siteso I'll let it slide for now...hehe ;-) Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP & Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Douglas Knudsen
I thought AS2 is ECMA based... http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/flash/articles/converting_actionscript2.html DK On 8/4/05, Ken Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tend to agree based on the posts I see from the laszlo mailing list, > which I've been following for the last few months. On th

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Ken Ferguson
I tend to agree based on the posts I see from the laszlo mailing list, which I've been following for the last few months. On this CF list you find questions like, "how do I do x?" while on the Laszlo list you see a lot more questions or comments on things that don't work at all and the work-aro

RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Damien McKenna
Looking at OpenLaszlo my one concern would be the *long* list of known issues with 3.0. I think one of the bug-fix frenzies popular in the OSS world would help here, maybe have a prize for the most bugs fixed in a month or something. -- Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Limu

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Yves Arsenault
Me to ;-) I've been looking at Laszlo for a little while... We did a few things on a laptop we set up on our network... Yves On 8/4/05, Chuck Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please post here as I am also interested in the code examples - particularly > those relating to CF (their web sit

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Chuck Mason
Please post here as I am also interested in the code examples - particularly those relating to CF (their web site has examples, but none relating to CF). Thanks! On Thursday 04 August 2005 12:28 pm, Bryan Stevenson wrote: > > Well, if they send you some good code examples and the like, I for one

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Bryan Stevenson
> Well, if they send you some good code examples and the like, I for one > would be very glad if you could post them out here or at least forward > them on to me! > > --Ferg but of course!! ;-) Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP & Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. pho

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Ken Ferguson
Well, if they send you some good code examples and the like, I for one would be very glad if you could post them out here or at least forward them on to me! --Ferg Bryan Stevenson wrote: >>You think Flex is cool now, read this: >> >>http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mesh/archives/2005/08/will_zorn

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Bryan Stevenson
> You think Flex is cool now, read this: > > http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mesh/archives/2005/08/will_zorn_requi.cfm > > > Jason Merrill | E-Learning Solutions | icfconsulting.com Sounds promisingbut a tad too vague for my likingit's all about what is and isn't in the list of enter

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Mike Chambers
ROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "P T Withington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 7:56 AM Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex > >Laszlo does not use AS2, but rather some proprietary scripting language (i > >dont have all of th

RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Merrill, Jason
You think Flex is cool now, read this: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mesh/archives/2005/08/will_zorn_requi.cfm Jason Merrill | E-Learning Solutions | icfconsulting.com NOTICE: This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or confidential information. I

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Ken Ferguson
AS2 may be the proprietary language, but we're talking about applications that compile to the proprietary Flash player, right??? I'd say that using the proprietary AS2 is actually a plus over ECMAScript, unless of course, you can argue that I'm wrong. --Ferg P T Withington wrote: >>Laszlo do

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread P T Withington
>Laszlo does not use AS2, but rather some proprietary scripting language (i >dont have all of the details). You're right on one point Mike: you _dont_ [sic] have all the details. Laszlo's scripting language _is_ ECMAScript. I believe it is AS2 that is the proprietary scripting language. P T

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Bryan Stevenson
> You're right on one point Mike: you _dont_ [sic] have all the details. > Laszlo's scripting language _is_ ECMAScript. I believe it is AS2 that is > the proprietary scripting language. Sheesh. > > P T Withington > Laszlo Systems OoooOOo a post from the Lazlo camp ;-) SoP T...if you

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread P T Withington
>Laszlo does not use AS2, but rather some proprietary scripting language (i >dont have all of the details). > >Flex UI markup is XML / Tag based, and the scripting language is >ActionScript (based on ECMA Script). You're right on one point Mike: you _dont_ [sic] have all the details. Laszlo's s

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Ken Ferguson
ectric Edge Systems Group Inc. >phone: 250.480.0642 >fax: 250.480.1264 >cell: 250.920.8830 >e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >web: www.electricedgesystems.com >- Original Message - >From: "Mike Chambers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "CF-Talk" >Sen

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 21:14, Chris Peters wrote: > I had ditched the idea of installing OpenLaszlo earlier because I didn't > want to deal with installing it on Tomcat. But now it's possible to > install it as a JRun app. Or just use it to generate stand-alone .swf :-) -- Tom Chiverton

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-04 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 19:49, Bryan Stevenson wrote: > and data usage.but what's missing is conditional logic and data > inserts/updates etc. I think of it as a replacement for DHTML in the Ajaz world - when ever something needs doing server-side like database chagnes, it invokes a web

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Bryan Stevenson
--- From: "Mike Chambers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 5:40 PM Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex >I was trying to show some interactivity, but here is a basic hello world: > > > http://www.macromedia.com/2003/mxml&quo

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Mike Chambers
t; Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 5:15 PM Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex > Thanks for the Hello World sample Mikepretty much as Lazlo does it > (although I must admit Lazlo code looks "cleaner"but if integration with > CF is easier (which I'd assume any MM product

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Mike Chambers
t; Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 5:15 PM Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex > Thanks for the Hello World sample Mikepretty much as Lazlo does it > (although I must admit Lazlo code looks "cleaner"but if integration with > CF is easier (which I'd assume any MM product

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Bryan Stevenson
tricedgesystems.com - Original Message - From: "Mike Chambers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 1:45 PM Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex > Laszlo does not use AS2, but rather some proprietary scripting language (i > dont ha

RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread dave
erson with predatory instincts who has not sufficient capital to form a corporation." From: "Damien McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 5:49 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex > > You

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Mike Chambers
function onClick() { outputField.text = "Hello World"; } mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Bryan Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 1:33

RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Damien McKenna
> > You need to look at OpenLaszlo 3, it supports Flash 6. > > that's still 2 versions behind (since i hear we will have > flash 8 here next week) That's splitting hairs, OpenLaszlo 3 has been out since April. So its more like 1.5 releases :-P -- Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread dave
stincts who has not sufficient capital to form a corporation." From: "Bryan Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 4:39 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex OKnow that I have more infoI h

RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Kevin Aebig
>> development standards ;-) Good for you... that's an ideology that many new developers should pick up and not enough existing developers follow. Cheers, Kevin -Original Message- From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 3, 2005 2:29 PM To: CF-Talk Subject:

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Ken Ferguson
Flex is tag-based as well. Flex uses the mxml language, which is MM's own xml-based language along with AS. The tags and JS you use in Laszlo are used to build the flash movie. In this same way, the tags and AS you use in Flex are used to generate the movie. I think it's fair to say that Laszlo

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Mike Chambers
As does Flex. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Ken Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 1:33 PM Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex > I believe the "Laszlo on shared servers" thin

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Bryan Stevenson
OKnow that I have more infoI have more questions ;-) I saw in the Lazlo demo that it's tag basedlike so: Hello World I've heard a bunch of folks mention AS 2 in relation to Flexnow I'm not sure if the use of AS 2 equates to Lazlo's use of JavaScript OR if AS 2 equates to Laz

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Ken Ferguson
quot; > >---- >From: "Trevor Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 4:13 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex > >But if you can do ActionScript in Flex then can you not call CF remoting &

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Bryan Stevenson
>I personally think both are a waste of time. I like the idea that's been > suggested with Zorn, but that remains to be seen... > > The biggest advantages offered by Flash are: > > - Dynamic Capabilities > - Lightweight > - Extremely Interactive > - Browser Persistence I hear ya Kevin.but what

RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread dave
a" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 4:09 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex > -Original Message- > From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > One thing to note right off the bat is that I believe the Laszlo > apps compile

RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread dave
- From: "Trevor Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 4:13 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex But if you can do ActionScript in Flex then can you not call CF remoting components to access database then? -Original M

RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Kevin Aebig
different IDE's pumping out different content, compiling to the same byte code is the best course of action. @@ Cents Cheers, Kevin -Original Message- From: Douglas Knudsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 3, 2005 1:44 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex On 8/3/0

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Ken Ferguson
You need to use some sort of scripting language to handle all of your data interaction and processing. You tie Flex or Laszlo to your components/web services, but they just sit in front of your application and allow you to generate a rich user interface. --Ferg Bryan Stevenson wrote: >OK...I'

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Bryan Stevenson
l: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.electricedgesystems.com - Original Message - From: "Matt Woodward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 1:07 PM Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex > >OK...I'm still missing the bigger picture &g

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Douglas Knudsen
Flex is UI level with the Flex server providing "gateways" to back end stuff, one way to put it at least.So yes, Flex has no DB interaction like CF does. Flex uses AS2, so has a standard programming model and all. You got it in your last sentence. DK On 8/3/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Chris Peters
While we're mentioning J2EE, I noticed that OpenLaszlo now can be installed as a WAR file on a J2EE app server. I had ditched the idea of installing OpenLaszlo earlier because I didn't want to deal with installing it on Tomcat. But now it's possible to install it as a JRun app. - Chris Peters

RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Trevor Orr
But if you can do ActionScript in Flex then can you not call CF remoting components to access database then? -Original Message- From: Matt Woodward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 1:08 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex >OK...I'm still

RE: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Damien McKenna
> -Original Message- > From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > One thing to note right off the bat is that I believe the Laszlo > apps compile to the Flash 5 format, thus cannot utilize the > features of AS 2, You need to look at OpenLaszlo 3, it supports Flash 6. -- Damien Mc

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Matt Woodward
>OK...I'm still missing the bigger picture > >As I said already...the Lazlo demo leads me to belive it's only for UI >coding (although there is talk of databut via XML only). Flex and Laszlo are both presentation servers, so yes, they only deal with the front end and presentation of data

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Bryan Stevenson
OK...I'm still missing the bigger picture As I said already...the Lazlo demo leads me to belive it's only for UI coding (although there is talk of databut via XML only). So does Lazlo (and Flex) have an equivalent of: -database interaction (CFQUERY) -conditional logic (CFIF/CFCASE) Or p

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Douglas Knudsen
On 8/3/05, Ken Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > **Qualifying statement: I'm an expert on neither Flex nor Laszlo. I am > answering from what I've heard and read added to my limited experience > actually using both Flex and Laszlo to build test applications. > > One thing to note right off the

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Ken Ferguson
**Qualifying statement: I'm an expert on neither Flex nor Laszlo. I am answering from what I've heard and read added to my limited experience actually using both Flex and Laszlo to build test applications. One thing to note right off the bat is that I believe the Laszlo apps compile to the Flas

Re: Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Bryan Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 11:25 AM Subject: Open Lazlo vs. Flex > Pardon me if this "vs" thread has already happened ;-) > > So which is easiest for a CFer to learn? How steep is the learning curve? >

Open Lazlo vs. Flex

2005-08-03 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Pardon me if this "vs" thread has already happened ;-) So which is easiest for a CFer to learn? How steep is the learning curve? Is it fair to say that both are basically a tag based version of ActionScript (broad picture...not a feature by feature comparison)? if not why? Anything else usefu