To be blunt and i've been on Plum since i think adam invited me ages
past, I really dig the concept and cannot fault it for what its
achieved.
I do however hold back in reservation as simply put: I don't have the
time or energy to inherit something ontop of a language that has its
own set of prob
"We are all individuals."
"I'm not!"
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:59:35 +0800, James Holmes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Follow the gourd!"
>
> "No, Follow the sandal!"
>
>
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-ba
"Follow the gourd!"
"No, Follow the sandal!"
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.c
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:23:26 -0500, Joe Rinehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because my opinion doesn't match
> yours is no reason to call me ignorant or uninformed.
I have to say that Adam's habit of jumping on anyone who dares to
criticize Plum is getting a bit tiring. I made some comments abou
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:53:51 -0500, Adam Churvis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The best way for everyone to assess this is to download and install Plum,
> then thorooughly read the Plum documentation.
Assuming you are running a Windows machine with .NET installed...
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://ww
I also tried Plum during the beta phase.
I didn't like it...then again, I don't like lobster either. (and in
both cases, I don't get all the hype)
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:23:26 -0500, Joe Rinehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You're missing 90% of Plum, Joe.
>
> Adam, you're very much underes
> You're missing 90% of Plum, Joe.
Adam, you're very much underestimating what I've done with Plum. I
wouldn't talk about it if I hadn't looked at it in great detail. I've
probably looked at the docs more extensively than most of your users,
examined the custom tag library, used tools like the c
> How does the Plum framework compare to Fusebox 4.1 or Mach-II in terms
> of functionality and extensibility of the core framework (excluding all
> the extra modules, I'm thinking of the core)?
Plum does quite a bit more in its core framework than either Fusebox or
Mach-ii.
The best way for ever
> >From what I've seen Plum is basically a code generator. There's not
> much of a framework to it. I diddled with it for a little while, and
> the 'framework' is more a set of custom tags that make it easier to
> build forms, do validation, master/detail pages, etc. Maybe I'm
> missing somethin
I may be off in some details, but it really doesn't.
>From what I've seen Plum is basically a code generator. There's not
much of a framework to it. I diddled with it for a little while, and
the 'framework' is more a set of custom tags that make it easier to
build forms, do validation, master/de
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> what are the selling points for Plum that would pull someone like
myself
> from Fusebox over to Plum or maybe not even over to but rather in
addition
> to?
I guess another way of asking this would be:
How do
11 matches
Mail list logo
