> Not necessarily. As a developer you can continue to build robust
> ColdFusion applications without having to worry about the J2EE
> underpinnings.
I disagree with this statement. I have had to learn a great deal about JRun
to develop in and host on ColdFusion MX. I have justified it with the "
Ben,
> That said, what I take out of this is that, to develop
> applications for the
> ColdFusion MX platform, we developers need a very thorough
> understanding of
> the JVM. This includes how to debug JVM related issues and
> where to go to
> locate information about JVM error messages.
Not
Steve,
First, your posts in this thread have been extraordinarily informative.
Thank you very much.
That said, what I take out of this is that, to develop applications for the
ColdFusion MX platform, we developers need a very thorough understanding of
the JVM. This includes how to debug JVM relat
good posts Steven! Being in charge of supporting our CF servers here
in my company I know first hand some of these difficulties introduced
with CFMX. CFMX introduced the whole J2EE platform stuffs to a large
crowd of non J2EE folks. Not being a JAR head I found this to be a
big jump in managing
Micha,
I reiterate; I don't believe that casting a broad net for specious reports,
incomplete data, and hyperbole will serve to solve whatever particular
difficulty ails a given server. I think most every case is rather unique,
although where common threads are drawn they get turned around into
Steven, are there any indications that Macromedia focuses on fixing the
foundation and adding new features afterwards? These issues come up a
lot, I see more stability issues than regular questions about the
language. I would hate to see new CFMX installs can only be used in
production environments
(Message Rejected: Reposting)Dave, Here's a few replies to your followup.
If I don't make sense, blame it on NYPD Blue :)
JRun metrics provide a simple view into the number of sessions and the
amount of memory allocated and free, and you might want to use this before
deciding to enable the more ro
> Neil, I'm a little late to the game here, but if you provide
> details of the problems you're experiencing, then I'll do my
> best to help out.
Steven, I have to say that's one hell of a good response! I've got some
followup questions for you.
> 3) how about GC logging or JRun
Neil, I'm a little late to the game here, but if you provide details of the
problems you're experiencing, then I'll do my best to help out.
ColdFusion configurations and environments *vary widely* among users. I
don't think that casting a broad net for specious reports, incomplete data,
and hyper
> These are all straight from the MM technotes and to be honest
> make no difference at all..
I've found a lot of the technote items to make a big difference in some
cases. In other cases, unfortunately, not so much. There seem to be so many
variables involved in CFMX server stability that ma
No, I don't save class files.
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:51 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Crash : Server Config or J2EE
We've had nothing but problems with CFMX enterprise/jrun in a hardware NLB
enviro
Yepagreed. We did this but still get the errors of a crash...
Come on MM, better debug tools in CF!
-Original Message-
From: Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2004 16:56
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Crash : Server Config or J2EE
That's true, they are o
; These are all straight from the MM technotes and to be honest make no
> difference at all..
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 November 2004 16:39
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CF Crash : Server Config o
Do you have save class files on?
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2004 16:51
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Crash : Server Config or J2EE
We've had nothing but problems with CFMX enterprise/jrun in a hardware NLB
environment with
I'm hoping blackstone is the
golden nugget of all cf builds.
-e
-Original Message-
From: Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Crash : Server Config or J2EE
Remember there are certain tags that don't
These are all straight from the MM technotes and to be honest make no
difference at all..
-Original Message-
From: Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2004 16:39
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Crash : Server Config or J2EE
Remember there are certain tags that don&#
Remember there are certain tags that don't obey the timeout request,
including , , , ,
and CFX tags.
Also, make sure your threadWaitTimeout in your jrun.xml file is set to
be equal or greater than your Timeout Request value in the CFAdmin
otherwise you'll get lots of RuntimeException errors in yo
running CFMX6.1 updated in J2EE modeon JRun on IIS5. I get a server
freak out on occassion, usually when the DB becomes unavailable. My
thoughts: I have the request-timeout set too high, 60 secs, and none
of the developers use the timeout attribute in cfquery. This box
hosts several apps, so wh
18 matches
Mail list logo
