On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:16:17 -0400, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since CFHTTP support is broken in all versions since CF 4.5 (as in
CFHTTPPARAM automatically urlencodes all the names and values, and there's
nothing we can do about it), I was wondering if there are any CFMX
alternatives to
, September 02, 2004 10:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFHTTP Alternatives
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:16:17 -0400, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since CFHTTP support is broken in all versions since CF 4.5 (as in
CFHTTPPARAM automatically urlencodes all the names and values, and there's
nothing we can do
There is an alternative written in c++
http://www.cftagstore.com/tags/cfxhttp5.cfm
I havn't used it but the claims made on the website are impressive.
Andrew.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:18:05 -0400, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did read the docs. The docs state:
encoded
Optional
Yes
Applies to FormField and CGI types; ignored for all other types. Specifies
whether to URLEncode the form field or header.
I am using it on a cookie type.
Yes, it really is an issue, as several sites that I'm pulling the data from
require login, and they don't recognize the URLEncoded session cookies sent
by CF.
Russ
_
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 11:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFHTTP
Thanks Andrew, I'll try it. Seems impressive.
Russ
_
From: Andrew Grosset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 11:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFHTTP Alternatives
There is an alternative written in c++
http://www.cftagstore.com/tags/cfxhttp5.cfm
I havn't used
Russ wrote:
I did read the docs. The docs state:
encodedOptional Yes
Applies to FormField and CGI types; ignored for all other types. Specifies
whether to URLEncode the form field or header.
I am using it on a cookie type.
IIRC you can use the CGI type to send cookies as well:
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 18:01:25 +0200, Jochem van Dieten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russ wrote:
I did read the docs. The docs state:
encodedOptional Yes
Applies to FormField and CGI types; ignored for all other types. Specifies
whether to URLEncode the form field or header.
I am using
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:50:24 -0400, Dave Carabetta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any reliable alternatives for using CFHTTP on Unix (in my case,
Solaris, but migrating to Linux in the near future)? I need to pass large
WDDX packets to a Python server extensively, and CFHTTP is just not an
Dave Carabetta wrote:
Are there any reliable alternatives for using CFHTTP on Unix (in my case,
Solaris, but migrating to Linux in the near future)? I need to pass large
WDDX packets to a Python server extensively, and CFHTTP is just not an
adequate, scalable solution. Time is also a big
10 matches
Mail list logo
