Thanks for all the info.
This answered my questions and then some!
This list is the greatest. Why can't everything be like CF-Talk!
Steve
-Original Message-
From: OÃuz Demirkapı [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 12:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX 7
I honestly didn't know that. My picture of a perfect Java has now come
to a tragic end...
Not so fast. Check out Pure Java AWT, as mentioned near the bottom of
this Doug Hughes post:
http://www.doughughes.net/index.cfm?event=viewEntryentryId=29
---
EMF idahopower.com made
Jordan Michaels wrote:
GD is platform-dependent - it's a C library. I suspect this is why Java
doesn't include it.
Perhaps Coldfusion 8 will include the Java Advanced Imaging Library.
That'd be awfully nice.
Rick
~|
Your license still covers it as it's still 2 physical CPUs.
On 01/11/06, DURETTE, STEVEN J (ASI-AIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
Sorry if this has been asked before, but I have a really short time
frame to provide an answer.
We are having a lease roll done to one of our servers.
DURETTE, STEVEN J (ASI-AIT) wrote:
replaced with a machine that has 2 dual core CPUs in it. Does anyone
know if that would count as 4 processors, or would it still be 2 because
there are only 2 physical cpus on the motherboard?
dual core processors still qualify as a single physical cpu.
Rick Root wrote:
DURETTE, STEVEN J (ASI-AIT) wrote:
replaced with a machine that has 2 dual core CPUs in it. Does anyone
know if that would count as 4 processors, or would it still be 2 because
there are only 2 physical cpus on the motherboard?
dual core processors still qualify as a
Subject: Re: CFMX 7 Licensing question
Rick Root wrote:
DURETTE, STEVEN J (ASI-AIT) wrote:
replaced with a machine that has 2 dual core CPUs in it. Does anyone
know if that would count as 4 processors, or would it still be 2 because
there are only 2 physical cpus on the motherboard
Jordan Michaels wrote:
Has anyone heard if this will change with quad core? What about with
Sun's T1 processor? That's got something like 16 cores...
Sounds like a freakin' mainframe!
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority
Check the licensing agreement... I believe it's per physical
processor, so you're even allowed to run multiple virtual machines
each with a copy of cf
Wow. I wonder if that applies to hosting too. If I buy one copy of CF,
I could host multiple VPS accounts on one machine with 'free' CF 7
Wow. I wonder if that applies to hosting too. If I buy one
copy of CF, I could host multiple VPS accounts on one machine
with 'free' CF 7 for each? I know you wouldn't get far with
Windows (which requires, what 1GB of ram per VM?), but in
Linux you'd make a killing.
It's my
It's my understanding that it applies to physical processors, period -
hosting or no hosting.
Good to know, Dave, thanks.
Your guest OS is not going to be the limiting factor, here.
It will be CF,
and the amount of memory you want to allocate to that.
I disagree. If you don't install
I disagree. If you don't install x-windows and turn off
unnecessary running services, Linux can run with a LOT less
RAM than Windows.
Considering that the minimum memory requirements to run CF on Linux or
Windows is 512MB, I don't think you'll find that it makes much of a
difference when
Considering that the minimum memory requirements to run CF on Linux or
Windows is 512MB, I don't think you'll find that it makes much of a
difference when you're trying to get 4 or 5 VMs on an ESX server.
What's that from, the sys reqs? If it truly is that much I'd agree.
But I'll bet you
But you understand this server stuff a lot better than I do Dave. I'm
just saying that from my experience, and what I have heard from
professionals that run hosting companies, it's a lot cheaper to run a
Linux box, partially because you can squish a lot more sites
on one box.
In response
What's that from, the sys reqs? If it truly is that much I'd
agree.
Yeah, it's from the Adobe system requirements. But in practice, for
production servers, it tends to be significantly higher.
But I'll bet you don't really need that much. I'm just
running a developer server locally here,
Munson, Jacob wrote:
Check the licensing agreement... I believe it's per physical
processor, so you're even allowed to run multiple virtual machines
each with a copy of cf
Wow. I wonder if that applies to hosting too. If I buy one copy of CF,
I could host multiple VPS accounts on one
CFMX7 is a memory hog. We have to specially tweak it to get it to run
stable on our 256 MB VPS's. Even then, if you do anything that's
slightly memory intensive, we will recommend you get something bigger
then a basic VPS.
So, unless you're doing dumb things (things like huge text processing
Dave Watts wrote:
Yeah, it's from the Adobe system requirements. But in practice, for
production servers, it tends to be significantly higher.
No doubt. Like Jordan said, you *CAN* run it on a 256MB VPS with some
tweaks ... but I wouldn't try to run anything more than a single, low
(anything other then a bare install is probably impossible).
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX 7 Licensing question
Dave Watts wrote:
Yeah, it's from the Adobe system
Munson, Jacob wrote:
CFMX7 is a memory hog. We have to specially tweak it to get it to run
stable on our 256 MB VPS's. Even then, if you do anything that's
slightly memory intensive, we will recommend you get something bigger
then a basic VPS.
So, unless you're doing dumb things (things like
I would assume it's similar on Windows... but when do you ever
run Windows without a GUI huh?
It's pretty rare in my experience, but Windows Server 2003 does this, if you
want. You could run previous versions of Windows (NT, 2000) without video
cards, using the embedded toolkit. But since most
Dave Watts wrote:
I would assume it's similar on Windows... but when do you ever
run Windows without a GUI huh?
It's pretty rare in my experience, but Windows Server 2003 does this, if you
want. You could run previous versions of Windows (NT, 2000) without video
cards, using the embedded
I have installed BlueDragon onto one of the Server4you Linux VPS which
has 256 MB Ram without any problem.
If you plan to use VPS, I would also recommend to consider a Linux based
solution. But nowadays dedicated server prices are also acceptable. You
can find a Linux dedicated server around
23 matches
Mail list logo
