RE: CFMX7 on DevNet

2005-02-11 Thread Calvin Ward
Is this the unlimited IP version or the Developer Edition? -Original Message- From: Cutter (CF related) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 8:13 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFMX7 on DevNet As promised (for those who want to know) CFMX 7 is now available from the

Re: CFMX7 on DevNet

2005-02-11 Thread Cutter (CF related)
I have not loaded it yet, but it does not state that it is the developer edition. And if it is the same as the CFMX 6.1 download was, then it would be the unlimited IP version. Calvin Ward wrote: Is this the unlimited IP version or the Developer Edition? -Original Message- From:

RE: CFMX7 and DevNet

2005-02-09 Thread Micha Schopman
Ouch ... I hope this gets solved ... I would not accept such a customer unfriendly answer from Macromedia. Micha Schopman Software Engineer Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380

RE: CFMX7 and DevNet

2005-02-09 Thread Calvin Ward
I believe the DevNet version of CF license required that each developer who used it also had a DevNet license. Am I remembering correctly? - Calvin -Original Message- From: Cutter (CF related) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:43 AM To: CF-Talk Subject:

Re: CFMX7 and DevNet

2005-02-09 Thread Cutter (CF related)
I don't remember this restriction (not that it matters much in my organization). A more important advantage for us was the ability for any of the 7+ members of our management staff could pull up a site in development from their desktop and gage it's progress without having to be at a specific

RE: CFMX7 and DevNet

2005-02-09 Thread Calvin Ward
: Re: CFMX7 and DevNet I don't remember this restriction (not that it matters much in my organization). A more important advantage for us was the ability for any of the 7+ members of our management staff could pull up a site in development from their desktop and gage it's progress without having

Re: CFMX7 and DevNet

2005-02-09 Thread Christian Cantrell
Hi, Cutter. Let me see if I can help: 1. It's true that each developer using the development server needs to have his or her own DevNet subscription. 2. The scenario you mention below is definitely legitimate. One of the advantages of the development server is that other people in the

Re: CFMX7 and DevNet

2005-02-09 Thread Alex Sherwood
To clarify here, you're saying that CFMX7 should be added to DevNet as a full, working version, just like CFMX 6.1 and all of the other platforms, but MM says the trial version is all we'll get? If this is the case, I think its pretty bogus. But, I'm sure the DevNet license states somewhere

Re: CFMX7 and DevNet

2005-02-09 Thread Cutter (CF related)
Christian, Thanks for your response. 1) As I noted previously, the developer portion I mentioned really doesn't pertain to my situation so much (as I am our sole developer), but it was worth noting for larger development shops who may have found that an advantage. I'll need to re-read that

Re: CFMX7 and DevNet

2005-02-09 Thread Cutter (CF related)
As promised, I sent an email to the address that Christian had provided to me (very similar in content to my original post starting this thread). Two minutes later (I'm not kidding folks) I received a call from Alicia with DevNet support. After reading my well thought out email (she doesn't

Re: CFMX7 and DevNet

2005-02-09 Thread dave
-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com Subject: Re: CFMX7 and DevNet As promised, I sent an email to the address that Christian had provided to me (very similar in content to my original post starting this thread). Two minutes later (I'm not kidding folks) I received a call from Alicia with DevNet