Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-18 Thread Al Musella, DPM
How do you handle undeliverable mail. I have been doing it manually, but it is time to automate it.. Is there a regex that can break out the ones that have to be deleted vs. the ones that just are temporarily down? Here are a few samples of what I mean: these can be deleted: Failed

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-18 Thread J.J. Merrick
This is how I did it about a year ago... http://jeremiahx.com/2007/08/12/how-to-email-bounce-management/ -J.J. On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Al Musella, DPM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do you handle undeliverable mail. I have been doing it manually, but it is time to automate it..

RE: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-18 Thread WebSite CFTalk
Check out Boogiebounce - http://www.boogietools.com We use it with iMS mailserver. Helge -Original Message- From: Al Musella, DPM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18. oktober 2008 14:59 To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CFMail Alternatives How do you handle undeliverable mail. I have been

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-18 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Al Musella, DPM wrote: Note that code 550 sometimes means no such user and other times means that we are being blocked.. they should have a standard coding system to make it easy:) We have a standard system. From RFC 2822: 5yz Permanent Negative Completion reply The command

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-18 Thread Al Musella, DPM
True, but in the case of : Failed Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: Remote host said: 550 550 Dynamic/zombied/spam IPs blocked. Write [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't want to delete this person from my newsletter automatically.. I want to be made aware of the situation and correct it, then resend

RE: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-17 Thread webmaster
Subject: Re: CFMail Alternatives If you are certain that the ColdFusion spooling process is the source of the slowness then turn off that feature. -Mike Chabot On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes I am sure it is the spooler. I sit there and watch

RE: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-17 Thread webmaster
How can I control sending mail to the cf spooler or not from the cfmail tag itself? This seems like it would be the best option. -Original Message- From: Mike Chabot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:19 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CFMail Alternatives I

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-17 Thread Mike Chabot
- From: Mike Chabot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:19 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CFMail Alternatives I worked on a site that sent many hundreds of thousands of emails every day using CF 7 Enterprise and it was fine. The thing we had to do though was to use two

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-17 Thread Matt Robertson
Can't slowly unspooling emails also be attributed to a mail server thats slow in accepting them? I know I have that problem with my SmarterMail-based mail server, although I can live with it because my CF-originating traffic is not all that time-critical. Surprised no one has recommended iMS

RE: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-17 Thread webmaster
plenty fast. -Original Message- From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 4:21 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CFMail Alternatives Can't slowly unspooling emails also be attributed to a mail server thats slow in accepting them? I know I have that problem

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-17 Thread Matt Robertson
Welp, iMS_SE is only $250. And they have a single-threaded free version you can try. Or at least they used to. Check their site. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Janitor, The Robertson Team mysecretbase.com On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also am using SmarterMail

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-17 Thread Al Musella, DPM
I also use smartermail.. and I think that it is the mail server slowing down the process.. not the cf spooler. The cf spooler looks like it is slow because it is waiting for the mail server. I also think this is a good thing.. I have to do strange things to intentionally slow down the

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-17 Thread Matt Robertson
as maddening as it is, fast mail is a problem as opposed to a solution it seems. I've used a mail trickler to get around this for years. http://mysecretbase.com/Slowing_Down_CFMail_2004.cfm It is far from perfect, but it works. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Janitor, The Robertson Team mysecretbase.com

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-16 Thread Raymond Camden
Last I heard, CF Enterprise could send an insane amount of email very quickly. I think maybe 50k per hour? I don't think 10k would be a problem. Of course, what about using multiple mail servers? You can have one client use mail server x, another one use y, etc. On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:40 PM,

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-16 Thread Wil Genovese
What version of Coldfusion are you using? Older versions of CF could take a long time to send spooled messages. It used to do on 100 every 15 seconds. I've tested CF8 and it does thousands every 15 seconds. We used to use CF_mail which was a wrapper for cfx_activemail on the old CF version.

RE: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-16 Thread webmaster
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:54 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CFMail Alternatives Last I heard, CF Enterprise could send an insane amount of email very quickly. I think maybe 50k per hour? I don't think 10k would be a problem. Of course, what about using multiple

RE: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-16 Thread webmaster
8 Standard Edition. -Original Message- From: Wil Genovese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 6:00 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CFMail Alternatives What version of Coldfusion are you using? Older versions of CF could take a long time to send spooled messages

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-16 Thread Raymond Camden
Are you sure it is the spooler? All you said was that it took a long for mail to get delivered. The slowdown could be anywhere. On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it would be much more cost effective to buy a mail tag than to shell out the $ for Enterprise

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-16 Thread Mike Chabot
: CFMail Alternatives Last I heard, CF Enterprise could send an insane amount of email very quickly. I think maybe 50k per hour? I don't think 10k would be a problem. Of course, what about using multiple mail servers? You can have one client use mail server x, another one use y, etc. On Thu

RE: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-16 Thread webmaster
Yes I am sure it is the spooler. I sit there and watch it. -Original Message- From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 9:33 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CFMail Alternatives Are you sure it is the spooler? All you said was that it took a long

Re: CFMail Alternatives

2008-10-16 Thread Mike Chabot
Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 9:33 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CFMail Alternatives Are you sure it is the spooler? All you said was that it took a long for mail to get delivered. The slowdown could be anywhere. On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:57 PM, [EMAIL

Re: cfmail alternatives

2005-06-17 Thread Claude Schneegans
We have CFMX 6.1 Standard, and we send quite a fair amount of email (sometimes 10's of thousand of messages per day). You don't expect people here to help you improve your spamming application, do you? ;-) -- ___ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See

RE: cfmail alternatives

2005-06-17 Thread Russ
: Friday, June 17, 2005 9:06 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: cfmail alternatives We have CFMX 6.1 Standard, and we send quite a fair amount of email (sometimes 10's of thousand of messages per day). You don't expect people here to help you improve your spamming application, do you

Re: cfmail alternatives

2005-06-17 Thread Ken Ferguson
, June 17, 2005 9:06 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: cfmail alternatives We have CFMX 6.1 Standard, and we send quite a fair amount of email (sometimes 10's of thousand of messages per day). You don't expect people here to help you improve your spamming application, do you

Re: cfmail alternatives

2005-06-17 Thread Howie Hamlin
iMS-Lite is free and can send your volume of mail with no problem: http://www.coolfusion.com/imslite iMS-SE is $250 and has 5x the processing power of iMS-Lite and also includes delivery status and bounced message handling which is particularly useful for list mail processing. Also, all iMS

RE: cfmail alternatives

2005-06-17 Thread Katz, Dov B \(IT\)
] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 11:26 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: cfmail alternatives iMS-Lite is free and can send your volume of mail with no problem: http://www.coolfusion.com/imslite iMS-SE is $250 and has 5x the processing power of iMS-Lite and also includes delivery status and bounced message

RE: cfmail alternatives

2005-06-17 Thread Russ
believe. -Original Message- From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 11:26 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: cfmail alternatives iMS-Lite is free and can send your volume of mail with no problem: http://www.coolfusion.com/imslite iMS-SE is $250 and has 5x

Re: cfmail alternatives

2005-06-17 Thread Howie Hamlin
iMS-Lite / iMS-SE are direct mail engines as opposed to ASPQMail which requires an external email server. The purpose of ASPQMail is to provide a queueing mechanism for ASPMail which allows the ASP page to complete without waiting for the mail to be completely sent (this is similar to the way

Re: cfmail alternatives

2005-06-17 Thread Howie Hamlin
--- On Friday, June 17, 2005 12:37 PM, Russ scribed: --- This looks very good... I am interested as well to find out what the performance of this is compared to CF standard and CF Enterprise. iMS-SE is capable of sending hundreds of thousands of email per day. In addition, you get

Re: cfmail alternatives

2005-06-16 Thread James Holmes
ActivMail is excellent: http://www.cfdev.com/activmail ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with

Re: CFMAIL Alternatives

2000-06-08 Thread Justin MacCarthy
Hi Sean, Look at iMS server from www.coolfusion.com It's cheap, if you just want the 'post' server. Otherwise,there is a COM on serverobjects.com for sending mail.I haven't used this though... ~Justin MacCarthy - Original Message - From: Sean Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: