Adam,
Point taken. But would why bother including a component which is
flawed in two pretty fundamental ways?
If this was a problem with an open source platform (say, PHP which by
the way has several flawless POP3 implementations), I wouldn't be
upset. I would politely request that it be fixed,
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:15:10 +1000, Jon Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand; if they would compile and run on Linux, I would be using
> them in a flash. These MM bugs are seriously holding up our
> development.
Sometimes your chosen platform cannot do what you think it should be
able
> Unfortunately, this is the case. Feel like writing a Java implementation?
:)
> I'm sure there are plenty of public-domain POP classes out there already.
Can you say "no utf-7 support"? With Sun not supporting unicode utf-7 it
seems to me that it's a poor choice for writing any sort of e-mail c
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your input.
> As you've already stated, you can't use CFX_POP3 so unless you can find a
> Java based replacement for CFPOP you aren't going to be able to do much to
> improve the state of your issues.
Unfortunately, this is the case. Feel like writing a Java
implementation? :
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your input.
> As you've already stated, you can't use CFX_POP3 so unless you can find a
> Java based replacement for CFPOP you aren't going to be able to do much to
> improve the state of your issues.
Unfortunately, this is the case. Feel like writing a Java
implementation?
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your input.
> As you've already stated, you can't use CFX_POP3 so unless you can find a
> Java based replacement for CFPOP you aren't going to be able to do much to
> improve the state of your issues.
Unfortunately, this is the case. Feel like writing a Java
implementation?
Jon,
As you've already stated, you can't use CFX_POP3 so unless you can find a
Java based replacement for CFPOP you aren't going to be able to do much to
improve the state of your issues.
Identifying the content-type of each attachment would mean extra
functionality in CFPOP that just isn't ther
Further to my CFPOP frustrations, does anyone know of a way to
determine the MIME type of the attachments? This is a bug I need to
close from awhile ago, and last time I looked at it, you can't.
Regards,
Jon
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:20:42 +1000, Jon Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
8 matches
Mail list logo
