The only way to really measure the performance of your application is
with load testing tools. Simply looking at the time it takes to process
a single request is generally not that useful. However, an execution
time above 250ms is just plain slow.
-Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: James
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:49 PM
Subject: RE: Finer grain performance indicators
> The only way to really measure the performance of your application i
James, everything in this sort of thing is relative, relative to both what
you are trying to achieve and why. What I mean by this is for instance do
you already have performance issues in an app and if so in comparison to
what? I don't think the number of fuses you are using makes things harder,
> I disagree, load testing comes after you have performance tuned the
> application for single requests, the execution times will point you to
> areas
> of code that need improvement, or optimization, load testing can help
> point
> you to bottle necks exosed when the throughput is much higher tha
> we all know about the Enable Performance Monitoring flag
> in the CF debug settings, it throws out some rough
> information about the processing time of each template
> used the the request.
Well, actually, that's a different setting. The "Show Detailed Processing
Time Breakdown" setting sho
Interesting discussion ... does anyone have any recommendations of good load
testing tools ... I am not sure if this is correct to say this (if it
matters), but I am obviously interested in load testing CF Apps.
Paul Giesenhagen
QuillDesign
http://www.quilldesign.com
SiteDirector Commerce Builder
Depends on your budget. Are you looking to spend nothing, a few hundred
dollars, or several thousand?
-Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Giesenhagen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 9:34 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Finer grain perform
> Interesting discussion ... does anyone have any
> recommendations of good load testing tools ... I am
> not sure if this is correct to say this (if it matters),
> but I am obviously interested in load testing CF Apps.
Here are some decent, free ones:
http://www.opensta.org/
http://webtool.rt
nday, May 05, 2002 9:34 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Finer grain performance indicators
> >
> > Interesting discussion ... does anyone have any recommendations of
> good
> > load
> > testing tools ... I am not sure if this is correct to say this (i
Charlie Arehart also setup a free deal with OpenDemand Systems for
CFers. Check out http://www.opendemand.com/cf.
-Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 9:48 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Finer grain perform
>From the good folks at Apache...
http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/index.html
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Giesenhagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: Finer grain performance i
See Dave's message than and my response to it.
-Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Giesenhagen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 9:47 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Finer grain performance indicators
>
> At this point it time, seve
I have played around with Web Performance Trainer. It's great. Also
Microsoft has a tool (Web Application Stress Tool or something similar ),
which has the ability to create 'test scripts' from log files. What better
way than to test your site against the way that people are surfing it?
A
> Charlie Arehart also setup a free deal with OpenDemand
> Systems for CFers. Check out http://www.opendemand.com/cf.
For what it's worth, when we evaluated OpenDemand, the current version
wasn't really good enough for our use - and we're not that picky. The price
is right, though.
Also, I don'
14 matches
Mail list logo
