Isn't there a Flash Remoting Java server shipped with EJB's now?
Are there any code samples floating around that I could peek at to see
if I want to try it out? For some reason, doing the remoting stuff in
Java peaks my interest more than with CF.
--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, Octo
> You've had a response to that - you just didn't like what you heard!
>
Come on now, that isn't true and you know it. Don't make me come after
you with my IM logs.
> The response is "Flash Remoting as supplied with CFMX Enterprise is
> designed to enable Flash / ColdFusion communication". It is
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 13:43 US/Pacific, jon hall wrote:
> Isn't there a Flash Remoting Java server shipped with EJB's now?
There is a Flash Remoting for J2EE product, yes:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashremoting/
> Are there any code samples floating around that I could peek at t
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 15:09 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
> And as I responded in IM, that isn't answer. Why?
It *is* an answer. Saying "wibble" would be an answer. I never claimed
it was a helpful answer!
> 1. If that was true I could buy Flash Remoting for J2EE and use it with
> CFMX
>
ECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to
dump CF!
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 15:09 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
> And as I responded in IM, that isn't answer. Why?
It *is* an answer. Saying &
D]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:15 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready
to
> dump CF!
>
> If you have CFMX for J2EE can you remote directly to Java objects or
do
> you
> need a second flash gateway? (Having to also
> It *is* an answer. Saying "wibble" would be an answer. I never claimed
> it was a helpful answer!
>
Well if that's the best you can do never mind. Why even waste anyone's
time with responses that aren't helpful? In my book, an answer is
supposed to be a solution to a problem; not "wibble".
> A
onsidering it's priced per processor I don't see
that being much of a stretch for MM's product offering.
Stace
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:45 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time C
y, October 08, 2002 11:57 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready
to
> dump CF!
>
> While I haven't used Remoting for Java to any great extent. Could you
not
> operate two flash gateways? (CFMX and Java)
>
> Although even
Matt,
> it is
> impossible for one to build an application that using Flash Remoting
> with both CF and Java.
This sounds like a great feature request, have you sent it to our development team yet?
http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform?6213=23
Vernon Viehe
ColdFusion Community Manag
-
From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to
dump CF!
Matt,
> it is
> impossible for one to build an application that using Flash Remoting
> with both
8 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready
to
> dump CF!
>
> Hi Vernon,
>
> Sounds like more of a Product Management issue though...If I'm
> understanding
> it correctly, running CFMX on J2EE should make Remoting availab
my reports even better, when other data
backs up what I'm reporting. =)
Thanks (really!)
-Vern
> -Original Message-
> From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:48 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF S
Matt,
Just because something may be intentional doesn't mean it's not a valid request.
Please see my other note regarding the importance of "officially" putting in your $.02
(or maybe $.04 in your case).
Thanks!
-Vern
> To speak to Vern's point, there is no need to put in a feature request
>
Oh. Sorry my bad. That's not cool. Is this JRun specific or any J2EE app
server?
Stace
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to
Done.
-Original Message-
From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:01 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to
dump CF!
Matt,
Just because something may be intentional doesn't mean it's n
-408-0900 x901
> -Original Message-
> From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:01 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready
to
> dump CF!
>
> Oh. Sorry my bad. That's not cool. Is
D]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to
dump CF!
I don't know how to say it more clearly. You cannot access Java classes
from Flash Remoting using CFMX. It doesn't matter what version of CFMX
you run or
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 20:45 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
> According to Sean, there is no way to use Flash Remoting with CF and
> Java from the same application server.
That is not what I said. You're just twisting people's words.
"I have always wished that my computer would be as easy t
ctober 09, 2002 12:42 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready
> to dump CF!
>
>
> Matt,
>
> > it is
> > impossible for one to build an application that using Flash Remoting
> > with both CF and Java.
>
> This
t; From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:42 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready
> to dump CF!
>
>
> Matt,
>
> > it is
> > impossible for one to build an applic
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 20:44 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
> In my book, an answer is
> supposed to be a solution to a problem; not "wibble".
Yeah? Well, not everyone reads your book...
> * Flash Remoting doesn't work...
Blah, blah, blah. OK, now you're really just being annoying. I've
d
this discussion is futile!
>
> Cheers
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:06 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready
to
> dump CF!
>
>
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:24 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready
> to dump CF!
>
>
> Vernon,
> Doesnt it sound logical to clean up bugs in CFMX before
> thinking of new
> feature
dent & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:18 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About r
> Actually, you're wrong. I'm surprised you haven't figured out how to
do
> it since you seem to be able to figure out all sorts of 'clever' hacks
> with our products!
>
> Yes, you *can* make this work but, yes, you do have to violate the
> license agreement to make it happen.
>
I have figured o
ssage-
> From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:24 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to
> dump CF!
>
> Vernon,
> Doesnt it sound logical to clean up bugs in CFMX before
> thin
--
From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to
dump CF!
Sorry Stacy I am least bothered with Flash and whatever gimmicks
it has to offer.. we all know by now.. alot of th
]
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:45 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter -
> About ready to dump CF!
> Importance: High
>
>
> Sorry Stacy I am
29 matches
Mail list logo