Re: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread jon hall
Isn't there a Flash Remoting Java server shipped with EJB's now? Are there any code samples floating around that I could peek at to see if I want to try it out? For some reason, doing the remoting stuff in Java peaks my interest more than with CF. -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, Octo

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Matt Liotta
> You've had a response to that - you just didn't like what you heard! > Come on now, that isn't true and you know it. Don't make me come after you with my IM logs. > The response is "Flash Remoting as supplied with CFMX Enterprise is > designed to enable Flash / ColdFusion communication". It is

Re: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 13:43 US/Pacific, jon hall wrote: > Isn't there a Flash Remoting Java server shipped with EJB's now? There is a Flash Remoting for J2EE product, yes: http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashremoting/ > Are there any code samples floating around that I could peek at t

Re: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 15:09 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote: > And as I responded in IM, that isn't answer. Why? It *is* an answer. Saying "wibble" would be an answer. I never claimed it was a helpful answer! > 1. If that was true I could buy Flash Remoting for J2EE and use it with > CFMX >

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Stacy Young
ECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:56 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF! On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 15:09 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote: > And as I responded in IM, that isn't answer. Why? It *is* an answer. Saying &

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Matt Liotta
D]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:15 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to > dump CF! > > If you have CFMX for J2EE can you remote directly to Java objects or do > you > need a second flash gateway? (Having to also

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Matt Liotta
> It *is* an answer. Saying "wibble" would be an answer. I never claimed > it was a helpful answer! > Well if that's the best you can do never mind. Why even waste anyone's time with responses that aren't helpful? In my book, an answer is supposed to be a solution to a problem; not "wibble". > A

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Stacy Young
onsidering it's priced per processor I don't see that being much of a stretch for MM's product offering. Stace -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:45 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time C

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Matt Liotta
y, October 08, 2002 11:57 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to > dump CF! > > While I haven't used Remoting for Java to any great extent. Could you not > operate two flash gateways? (CFMX and Java) > > Although even

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Vernon Viehe
Matt, > it is > impossible for one to build an application that using Flash Remoting > with both CF and Java. This sounds like a great feature request, have you sent it to our development team yet? http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform?6213=23 Vernon Viehe ColdFusion Community Manag

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Stacy Young
- From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:42 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF! Matt, > it is > impossible for one to build an application that using Flash Remoting > with both

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Matt Liotta
8 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to > dump CF! > > Hi Vernon, > > Sounds like more of a Product Management issue though...If I'm > understanding > it correctly, running CFMX on J2EE should make Remoting availab

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Vernon Viehe
my reports even better, when other data backs up what I'm reporting. =) Thanks (really!) -Vern > -Original Message- > From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:48 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF S

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Vernon Viehe
Matt, Just because something may be intentional doesn't mean it's not a valid request. Please see my other note regarding the importance of "officially" putting in your $.02 (or maybe $.04 in your case). Thanks! -Vern > To speak to Vern's point, there is no need to put in a feature request >

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Stacy Young
Oh. Sorry my bad. That's not cool. Is this JRun specific or any J2EE app server? Stace -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:55 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Stacy Young
Done. -Original Message- From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:01 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF! Matt, Just because something may be intentional doesn't mean it's n

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Matt Liotta
-408-0900 x901 > -Original Message- > From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:01 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to > dump CF! > > Oh. Sorry my bad. That's not cool. Is

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Stacy Young
D]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:06 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF! I don't know how to say it more clearly. You cannot access Java classes from Flash Remoting using CFMX. It doesn't matter what version of CFMX you run or

Re: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 20:45 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote: > According to Sean, there is no way to use Flash Remoting with CF and > Java from the same application server. That is not what I said. You're just twisting people's words. "I have always wished that my computer would be as easy t

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Joe Eugene
ctober 09, 2002 12:42 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready > to dump CF! > > > Matt, > > > it is > > impossible for one to build an application that using Flash Remoting > > with both CF and Java. > > This

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Stacy Young
t; From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:42 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready > to dump CF! > > > Matt, > > > it is > > impossible for one to build an applic

Re: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 20:44 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote: > In my book, an answer is > supposed to be a solution to a problem; not "wibble". Yeah? Well, not everyone reads your book... > * Flash Remoting doesn't work... Blah, blah, blah. OK, now you're really just being annoying. I've d

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Matt Liotta
this discussion is futile! > > Cheers > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:06 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to > dump CF! > >

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Vernon Viehe
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:24 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready > to dump CF! > > > Vernon, > Doesnt it sound logical to clean up bugs in CFMX before > thinking of new > feature

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Matt Liotta
dent & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901 > -Original Message- > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:18 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About r

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Matt Liotta
> Actually, you're wrong. I'm surprised you haven't figured out how to do > it since you seem to be able to figure out all sorts of 'clever' hacks > with our products! > > Yes, you *can* make this work but, yes, you do have to violate the > license agreement to make it happen. > I have figured o

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Joe Eugene
ssage- > From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:24 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to > dump CF! > > Vernon, > Doesnt it sound logical to clean up bugs in CFMX before > thin

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-08 Thread Stacy Young
-- From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:45 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF! Sorry Stacy I am least bothered with Flash and whatever gimmicks it has to offer.. we all know by now.. alot of th

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-09 Thread Mike Chambers
] > -Original Message- > From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:45 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - > About ready to dump CF! > Importance: High > > > Sorry Stacy I am