Dave Watts wrote:
So, my question is, what do ASP people refer to components as?
Within a well-designed classic ASP application, business logic is
separated from ASP scripting by putting it within COM (or COM+ or MTS)
objects. Classic ASP development best practices recommend the use of COM
I am not an ASP person, but as far as I know ASP is an interpreted language and in its capabilities similar to CF5 (through CF has way more futures). There is no equivalent of components for ASP AFAIK. I think CFMX is more like .net.
I would suggest that you use web services for communication
ASP is not object oriented so you won't get anything like components.
ASP is procedural. If you want something OO based then maybe the ASP
guys can change over to ASP.NET which is OO. It sounds like web services
would be the best way to go for what you want to do.
Ben
-Original Message-
ASP's equivalent of a CFC would be a VB based COM object.
If you need two way communications and they're stuck with traditional ASP,
then WDDX may be the best approach.There's a WDDX COM object they can use
to serialize/deserialize ASP variables the same way we do with CF.
If they were to use
So, my question is, what do ASP people refer to components as?
Within a well-designed classic ASP application, business logic is
separated from ASP scripting by putting it within COM (or COM+ or MTS)
objects. Classic ASP development best practices recommend the use of COM
for any significant
COM OBJECTS?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: Translation please: CFC::CF as ???:ASP
Hi guys!I have a client who is dealing with a software development company that supplies a VB-based client
6 matches
Mail list logo
