Re: web servers - apache or IIS

thanks very much for all your help. good point about going with what they know jim. When i asked the admin people what they would prefer they looked blank and didnt say much when it came to apache so i think that was my answer :) thanks very much again for all your help ~~

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

> I know my client would prefer to use an IIS web server, in > order for it to sit on a windows server platform. Do most > people use IIS with Coldfusion? can anybody tell me if this > is adequate or whether i should really be pushing for a > different environment? As several people have menti

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

> Is there not alot more security concern for IIS as compared > to Apache? I have always heard this, so have always ran > Apache on my windows server. > Things may have changed in IIS with the release of windows > 2003 server. IIS 6 is adequately secure by default. IIS 5 was not, but could easi

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

From: Eric Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 6:47 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: web servers - apache or IIS I would say if you are hosting on Windows, go with IIS as IIS was made to work with windows. If you are going with UNIX/LINUX...go with Apache. Eric ---

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

servers - apache or IIS Well put as usual Jim. -Original Message- From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 2:58 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: web servers - apache or IIS > -Original Message- > From: Richard White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

Well put as usual Jim. -Original Message- From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 2:58 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: web servers - apache or IIS > -Original Message- > From: Richard White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, De

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

> -Original Message- > From: Richard White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 4:10 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: web servers - apache or IIS > > hi, i am about to deploy my first coldfusion application within my clients > site but have been asked the question in re

Re: web servers - apache or IIS

> I know my client would prefer to use an IIS web server, in order for it to > sit on a windows server platform. This is a common misconception, Apache does run on Windows, in fact IIRC, most Apache installs out there are on Windows servers, and Apache currently holds 70% of the web server market

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

Only if you leave your server wide open, don't have a hav a firewall and never patch it. -Original Message- From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 December 2006 13:09 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: web servers - apache or IIS Is there not alot more security concern for I

Re: web servers - apache or IIS

-Talk Sent: Sat Dec 23 13:08:32 2006 Subject: Re: web servers - apache or IIS Is there not alot more security concern for IIS as compared to Apache? I have always heard this, so have always ran Apache on my windows server. Things may have changed in IIS with the release of windows 2003 server.

Re: web servers - apache or IIS

Is there not alot more security concern for IIS as compared to Apache? I have always heard this, so have always ran Apache on my windows server. Things may have changed in IIS with the release of windows 2003 server. Doug B. ~

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

Unless you have any very specific reason to use Apache, as in a feature that IIS does not support, then there is no reason not to use IIS if your running on windows, it will do everything you need. The most common reason people always had to use Apache was mod_rewrite, but this now exists for IIS i

Re: web servers - apache or IIS

IIS is for sure good enough, it is literally down to preference now. IIS is certainly the easier to config I think. "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 67

Re: web servers

Doug James wrote: > Now that my pricing question has been answered. > > How about which web server versions are supported. I may be blind in one eye > and can't see out of > the other but cannot seem to find any information on web servers here >

RE: Web Servers

Dylan Bromby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 6 November 2000 11:57:AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Web Servers I run PWS and CF 4.5 on my laptop and RDS works fine. I run PWS and CF 4.0 on a PC and RDS works there too. RAM can be a pain if you're not at 128 (my opinion anyway). Make sure e

RE: Web Servers

Wow I didn't realize Apache would work under Win98. - Steve -Original Message- From: Steve Bernard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 7:06 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Web Servers If you want something free for Win98 the only solution, in my opinio

Re: Web Servers

From: "Parker, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 5:13 PM Subject: RE: Web Servers > Maybe its just me but I haven't had much joy with PWS. It never wants to > install properly even though it seems to

RE: Web Servers

ay, 6 November 2000 11:24:AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Web Servers What are you trying to do? PWS is very simple and easy to install/manage. What do you need from the web server? I run IIS4.0, PWS, and O'Reilly 2.4 on various machines for various reasons. -Original Message- From:

RE: Web Servers

What are you trying to do? PWS is very simple and easy to install/manage. What do you need from the web server? I run IIS4.0, PWS, and O'Reilly 2.4 on various machines for various reasons. -Original Message- From: Parker, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000

RE: Web Servers

is the deal. http://www.apache.org/ Steve -Original Message- From: Shane Witbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 6:45 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Web Servers If you have the means, go get win2k and install IIS on your dev. machine. I have win2k installed with

RE: Web Servers

If you have the means, go get win2k and install IIS on your dev. machine. I have win2k installed with IIS as my dev machine and it works great. If not, then Apache. Shane Witbeck Webmaster www.digitalsanctum.com -Original Message- From: Parker, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sund

Re: Web servers

On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, paul smith spake thusly: > Except that WS has the best documentation of any software, anywhere, > and the best support from users and developers. This TOTALLY > overshadows any cost advantage IIS purports to have. I would have to disagree on both points, those accolades belo

Re: Web servers

Except that WS has the best documentation of any software, anywhere, and the best support from users and developers. This TOTALLY overshadows any cost advantage IIS purports to have. best, paul At 10:50 AM 9/7/00 -0700, you wrote: >The only winning point I'd have for IIS would be the interface

RE: Web servers

Several people have asked me privately what server do I use. I host with Website 2.5 and IIS. We have several customers that want or need ASP 3 and IIS is the only solution in that environment. - Steve Steve Pierce, HDL "Co-Location starting $99 per month, no setup fee" (734) 482-9682 | mailto:

RE: Web servers

Developer, c4.net voice: (508) 240-0051 fax: (508) 240-0057 -Original Message- From: Bud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 8:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Web servers On 9/7/00, Steve Pierce penned: >IIS is a great product and you can't b

RE: Web servers

On 9/7/00, Steve Pierce penned: >IIS is a great product and you can't beat the price. But if you need carrier >class reliability and scalability and can use CF instead of ASP 3, Website >is a pretty good solution. OK, thanks. Everything you said is about what I've heard. Of course, I heard most

RE: Web servers

setup fee" (734) 482-9682 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://HDL.com = Steve -Original Message- From: Bud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 6:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Web servers On 9/7/00, Benjamin S. Rogers penned: >For >t

RE: Web servers

On 9/7/00, Benjamin S. Rogers penned: >For >this matter, and the fact that I don't run that many domains on a single >server, I only run ColdFusion sites on IIS. In fact, I saw a tremendous >performance gain switching my ColdFusion sites from WebSite to IIS to the >extent that competitors were ask

Re: Web servers

Hmmm... I don't recall "sucking donkey balls" on IIS's feature list, but I'll ask MS tech support about that feature. Although I've never observed IIS anywhere near a Donkey's ass...I'll be dammed if that's a redundancy or what :-p Seriously tho, as far as speed is concerned I've noticed n

RE: Web servers

PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Web servers Go to their website (no pun intended =) and look at their information. They have a section comparing them to IIS and Netscape Webserver. Also, IMO, I think WebSite Pro is easier to use and more powerful than IIS, from my own experi

RE: Web servers

easy with its setup. I can't wait until they get an upgrade out. Justin Kidman -Original Message- From: Adrian Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 2:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Web servers - Original Message - From: "Jo

Re: Web servers

- Original Message - From: "Ed Toon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:37 AM > Yes... WebSite doesn't suck donkey balls. OK - apart from that? Adrian Cooper. -- Archives: http://www.m

Re: Web servers

- Original Message - From: "Benjamin S. Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 2:38 PM > server, I only run ColdFusion sites on IIS. In fact, I saw a tremendous > performance gain switching my ColdFusion sites from WebSite to IIS to the > extent that competitors

RE: Web servers

>Are there any advantages in running Website over the native IIS5 with CF/Win2K? Oh great, now you did it. This thread won't die for a week or two. :) I've run both (and Apache for that matter). IIS can't handle as many domains on a single server as WebSite. This has to do with the intigration o

RE: Web servers

Yes... WebSite doesn't suck donkey balls. > Are there any advantages in running Website over the native IIS5 with CF/Win2K? -- Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ To Unsubscribe visit http:

Re: Web servers

- Original Message - From: "John Fix 3rd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 8:47 PM > Website Pro from O'Reilly works great with Cold Fusion and Windows 2000. > > http://website.oreilly.com Are there any advantages in running Website over the native IIS5 with CF

RE: Web servers

> I've recently upgraded to Windows 2000 and am having a hard time > finding a > web server to run Cold Fusion. Microsoft's IIS won't install over > Win2000. Any suggestions on a web server that will work? Am I > destined to > configure Apache for the job? You need to install IIS 5 from the Wi

RE: Web servers

Website Pro from O'Reilly works great with Cold Fusion and Windows 2000. http://website.oreilly.com John -Original Message- From: Les Irvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 2:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Web servers I've recently upgraded to Windo

Re: Web servers

Windows 2000 comes with IIS 5..look at the documentation. - Original Message - From: "Les Irvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 12:30 PM Subject: Web servers > I've recently upgraded to Windows 2000 and am having a hard time finding a > we

RE: Web servers

I've got a few Windows 2000 machines, and all of them have IIS on them. It's on the install CD, so you should be able to add it. I've got CF 4.5.1, Spectra 1.0.1, and Tardis running on Windows 2000 Pro, so it should work. Jason Aden webworld studios, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-

Re: Web servers

Website by O'Reilly works on Win2k without a problem. Additionally, I've run the IIS that comes with the CD and it's ok. You might need to use that one specifically rather than the 'old' IIS 4. Michael Dinowitz Publisher - The Fusion Authority (www.fusionauthority.com/alert) ListManager - CF-Talk

RE: Web servers

. Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 1:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Web servers This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0175_01C0182B.7A9D8DA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Enco

Re: Web servers

you have to install iis 5 from the win2000 disk it is an addon go to add/remove programs and install it that way -joeyb On Wed, 06 September 2000, Les Irvin wrote: > > I've recently upgraded to Windows 2000 and am having a hard time finding a > web server to run Cold Fusion. Micros

Re: Web servers

IIS version 5 comes with WIN2K Server. We have ColdFusion running successfully on WIN2K with both IIS5 and O'Reilly WebSite Pro version 2.5. Regards, Howie - Original Message - From: "Les Irvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 1:30 PM Sub

RE: Web servers

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0175_01C0182B.7A9D8DA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Web serversIIS 5 I believe comes with Win2K server. Apache is not a bad webserver, depending on what you want to do it

RE: Web servers

> I've recently upgraded to Windows 2000 and am having a hard > time finding a web server to run Cold Fusion. Microsoft's IIS > won't install over Win2000. Any suggestions on a web server > that will work? Am I destined to configure Apache for the job? Although you can certainly use Apache on

RE: Web servers

We run O'Reilly's WebSite Pro here and I love it. website.oreilly.com is where you can find info on it. Justin Kidman -Original Message- From: Les Irvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 10:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Web servers I've recently upg

RE: Web Servers

erver software anyway. Steve > -Original Message- > From: Billy Cravens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 17:40 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Web Servers > > > #cgi.server_software# > > Billy > > - Original Message - &

Re: Web Servers

#cgi.server_software# Billy - Original Message - From: Gary McNeel, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cf-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 11:34 AM Subject: OT: Web Servers > Is there a way to tell what another web site is running on? What type of > server it is? > > Than

RE: Web Servers

you can also ask netcraft - http://www.netcraft.com/whats/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 5/18/00 6:22 PM Subject: RE: Web Servers > Is there a way to tell what another web site is running on? > What type of server it i

RE: Web Servers

> Is there a way to tell what another web site is running on? > What type of server it is? By default, web servers identify themselves in their HTTP response headers. You can use telnet or netcat to talk directly to the server, and read the header. There's a tool called HTTP Analyzer which makes

Re: Web Servers

The server type is usually in the HTTP headers. You can download our freeware http analyzer (http://www.coolfusion.com/http.htm) and you will see the headers in the display. HTH, Howie Hamlin -- inFusion Project Manager; On-Line Data Solutions, Inc. (631)737-4668 www.CoolFusion.com

Re: Web Servers

Try here: http://www.netcraft.com/whats/ > Is there a way to tell what another web site is running on? What type of > server it is? > > Thanks. > > Gary McNeel, Jr. -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk