I am thinking about creating a transaction history for auditing, repairing
and undoing. I am thinking about using XML since this would be easy to
create and would adjust naturally to the addition of new attributes.
However, this would make the file sizes larger.
What are everyone's thoughts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy wrote:
I am thinking about creating a transaction history for auditing, repairing
and undoing. I am thinking about using XML since this would be easy to
create and would adjust naturally to the addition of new attributes.
However, this
Andy wrote:
I am thinking about creating a transaction history for auditing, repairing
and undoing. I am thinking about using XML since this would be easy to
create and would adjust naturally to the addition of new attributes.
However, this would make the file sizes larger.
What are
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 8:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Transaction History File
Andy wrote:
I am thinking about creating a transaction history for auditing, repairing
and undoing. I am thinking about using XML since
-Original Message-
From: Keith Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 7:49 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Transaction History File
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy wrote:
I am thinking about creating a transaction history for auditing
Andy wrote:
I am thinking about creating a transaction history for
auditing, repairing
and undoing. I am thinking about using XML since this
would be easy to
create and would adjust naturally to the addition of new
attributes.
However, this would make the file sizes larger.
What are
2. Keeping it in XML format
Not so good. My objection here is that appending to the
log would be prohibitively expensive. If you're doing
logging, the format of your file needs to be something
you can append to without needing to do any messing with
the rest of the file. Because XML
Keith,
My thought was something of a highbred, with the entire
XML on one line.
Basically CFWDDX the structure containing the object and
CFILE to the
log. I might add some header to the start of the line
before saving, such
as object name and date.
What do you think about this approach?
Actually, the problem is that in the shared environment I am in, I can't
count on the transaction logs. So I need to wrap my own.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 9:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Transaction History
S.Isaac Dealey wrote:
Files: use the snapshot capabilities from your OS/FS
For an application that might be deployed on any given OS/FS?
Which OS/FS on which CFMX is supported does not have snapshot
capabilities?
Database: use the native tools from your database
For an application
Jochem,
I need to read up on MS SQL Transaction logs and discuss options with my
host. Should I also read-up on snapshots? Outside of UML, I don't know
what they are.
Andy
Files: use the snapshot capabilities from your OS/FS
For an application that might be deployed on any given OS/FS?
Andy wrote:
I need to read up on MS SQL Transaction logs and discuss options with my
host. Should I also read-up on snapshots? Outside of UML, I don't know
what they are.
Snapshots is just for files, not for databases.
Jochem
S.Isaac Dealey wrote:
Files: use the snapshot capabilities from your OS/FS
For an application that might be deployed on any given
OS/FS?
Which OS/FS on which CFMX is supported does not have
snapshot capabilities?
Don't they vary from one OS to the next? ...
Granted, Andy's probably only
Which OS/FS on which CFMX is supported does not have
snapshot capabilities?
Don't they vary from one OS to the next? ...
Granted, Andy's probably only looking to make this work for the one
application (os/database/platform),
YUP. NOT TRYING TO MAKE IT COMPLICATED OR PORTABLE. THAT SAID,
S.Isaac Dealey wrote:
S.Isaac Dealey wrote:
Files: use the snapshot capabilities from your OS/FS
For an application that might be deployed on any given
OS/FS?
Which OS/FS on which CFMX is supported does not have
snapshot capabilities?
Don't they vary from one OS to the next? ...
15 matches
Mail list logo
