Dinner wrote:
> On 8/22/07, Sean Corfield wrote:
>>
>> The point of code coverage is *measurability*. By definition, you get
>> better coverage by having better tests but that's irrelevant to the
>> process of figuring out the *amount* of coverage.
>
> I could see how one could say "I tested for
On 8/22/07, Sean Corfield wrote:
>
> On 8/21/07, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That wikipedia ROCKS!
>
> Don't believe everything you read on wikipedia - it's descriptions of
> some design patterns are pitiful, for example.
Fo sho- Did you see the page on Dada "Art"? ;-)
Do you ever edit
On 8/21/07, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That wikipedia ROCKS!
Don't believe everything you read on wikipedia - it's descriptions of
some design patterns are pitiful, for example.
> Seems like the most plausible way to get that kind of
> "coverage" is through Test Driven Design
The point
That wikipedia ROCKS!
Seems like the most plausible way to get that kind of
"coverage" is through Test Driven Design, and I mean
the kind where you sorta define the thing you're trying
to build in the empty space of the tests, or whatever.
Automated might get buffer-overflow type stuff, but I
thi
on of whether
this is a serious possibility for them. Maybe if there's enough demand it'd
move up the priority list?
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2007 12:32 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE
It looks as though I am going to have to develop a solution for our needs,
but I will see if my company will allow me to release our efforts into the
public domain.
~|
ColdFusion 8 - Build next generation apps
today, with easy PD
On 8/20/07, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone aware of a code coverage tool for CF unit tests? If not, how are
> the rest of you handling unit test coverage (if at all)?
I get this question a lot since I'm doing a lot of automation/testing
consulting in the CF world and the answer is no
@dinner: code coverage determines the percentage of your code that is
actually being unit tested. For example, you could have a function in a
component that has a test case written for it, but the function could
contain if/elself/else statements, switch statements or other conditional
logic that t
> What do you mean by code coverage?
Per the wonders of wikipedia:
"Code coverage is a measure used in software testing. It describes the
degree to which the source code of a program has been tested."
I have just joined a new team, and we have quite a bit of legacy code for
older products and we
On 8/20/07, Rich wrote:
> Is anyone aware of a code coverage tool for CF unit tests? If not, how
are
> the rest of you handling unit test coverage (if at all)?
The CFUnit view in CFEclipse is cool, and there's also the TPTP
JUnit auto-generated stuff, but honestly, selenium has been the
most usef
Is anyone aware of a code coverage tool for CF unit tests? If not, how are
the rest of you handling unit test coverage (if at all)?
- Rich Kroll
~|
ColdFusion 8 - Build next generation apps
today, with easy PDF and Ajax fea
11 matches
Mail list logo
