> > > So does VMWare for Linux run under MacOSX? Now *that* would be a
> > > solution :)
> >
> > VirtualPC emulates a PC and runs on OS X.
>
> Right. But VMWare let's you install *lots* of OS's -- most *nix, most Win,
> even Solaris if you're a glutton for install punishment. With VMWare, you
> cou
ROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:54 AM
Subject: RE: Unix database syntactically similar to SQL Server?
> I wonder what kind of system specs would be required to run an emulator,
> MS SQL Server, CFMXJ2EE, JRun4 and Jedit on a Ma
PROTECTED]
*
-Original Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 9:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Unix database syntactically similar to SQL Server
Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 9:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Unix database syntactically similar to SQL Server?
> On Friday, January 10, 2003, at 07:09 PM, John Paul Ashenfelter wrote:
>
> > So does VMWare for Linux run
> On Friday, January 10, 2003, at 07:09 PM, John Paul Ashenfelter wrote:
>
> > So does VMWare for Linux run under MacOSX? Now *that* would be a
> > solution :)
>
> VirtualPC emulates a PC and runs on OS X.
Right. But VMWare let's you install *lots* of OS's -- most *nix, most Win,
even Solaris if y
> It all comes down to the complexity of the SQL --
> specifically how much server-specific stuff you need
> to do. Obscure (or obsfucated) functions (e.g. MySQL
> password hash function), crazy things like code pages
> and collation orders, queries with linked servers, etc.
> All that stuff w
On Friday, January 10, 2003, at 07:09 PM, John Paul Ashenfelter wrote:
> So does VMWare for Linux run under MacOSX? Now *that* would be a
> solution :)
VirtualPC emulates a PC and runs on OS X.
Dick
~|
Archives: http://www.hou
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:24 PM
Subject: RE: Unix database syntactically similar to SQL Server?
> > But wow, do I think this is a bad idea.
> >
> > Databases are the core of many CF applications -- you
> > should use the same database for development,
> In an ideal world, I agree with you. However, I've actually been pretty
> successful using MS SQL Server as a development platform for Sybase (on
because sql server is/was son-of-sybase run amok. even access <--> sql
server has some quirks.
~~
On Friday, January 10, 2003, at 03:07 PM, Joshua Miller wrote:
> Thanks for the input guys, looking forward to a 100% Mac development
> environment :)
>
>
Um my goal is a 100% Mac Deployment environment %^D>
but I am really happy to have what we have.
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:25 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Unix database syntactically similar to SQL Server?
> But wow, do I think this is a bad idea.
>
> Databases are the core of many CF applications -- you
> should use the same da
> But wow, do I think this is a bad idea.
>
> Databases are the core of many CF applications -- you
> should use the same database for development, staging,
> and production. Would you develop in CF4.5 and deploy
> to CFMX (or CF5 for that matter)? Would you develop on
> Windows and deploy to So
John Paul Ashenfelter wrote:
>
> That said, focus on ANSI-standard SQL and do the following:
> check your datatypes for compliance in both
> check the case-sensitivity in both (files and dbs)
> check the functions you use are in both dbs, or write a script to replace
> common substitutions
common substitutions
or maybe just move production to MySQL or Postgres.
Regards,
John Paul Ashenfelter
CTO/Transitionpoint
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Joshua Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Frid
Sybase_ASE shares common ancestry with SQL-Severe (Freudian typo).
MS and Sybase worked together for a while to develop SQL-Server.
Sybase uses T/SQL and it is very similar to MS T/SQL (and Sybase wants
to hear about any differences so they can be made compatible).
You can download a free dev
> Anyone know what the most syntactically similar RDBMS to
> SQL Server is for Unix/Linux ?
> ...
> Sybase? Postgre? mySQL?
Sybase would be the most syntactically similar. Both use Transact-SQL, and
there are few differences.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202
Anyone know what the most syntactically similar RDBMS to SQL Server is
for Unix/Linux ?
I've setup my CFMXJ2EE / JRun scenario on my Mac, but my application
uses a SQL Server database. I'd like to install something on the Mac
that would be pretty similar for a development environment so that I
do
17 matches
Mail list logo
