I still can't find a solution to this. I've been experimenting with the
differnet kind of mail (text vs html) that gets dumped in the spool.
I did a mailing with 1,800 text emails about 1.5k each. Server sent them
all within 10 minutes or so, restarting only three times.
I did another mailing
Hey gang -
I'm looking to see if anyone has a spare copy/license of CF5 for Linux
they're willing to part with. It seems Macromedia won't sell CF5 anymore,
at all.
If anyone out there in CF-Talk land can help, drop me a note off-list.
Thanks!
--Scott
Subject: Looking for CF5 Linux copy/license
| Hey gang -
|
| I'm looking to see if anyone has a spare copy/license of CF5 for Linux
| they're willing to part with. It seems Macromedia won't sell CF5 anymore,
| at all.
|
| If anyone out there in CF-Talk land can help, drop me a note off-list
We have just recently installed cf5 on a linux platform. We are getting errors using
CFFILE CFDIRECTORY, even thought thay are activated in the administrator.
I think it might be some sort of ownership problem, can anyone point me in the right
direction
thanks
Steve Soars
oops sorry wrong list
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:20 PM
Subject: cf5 linux
We have just recently installed cf5 on a linux platform. We are getting
errors using CFFILE CFDIRECTORY, even thought thay
Sean A Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:D5C19F2F-F1F0-11D6-9787-0003939B3F7E;corfield.org...
Last I heard there were still compatibility issues with mod_perl and
Apache 2.0.x (and some other modules I believe)?
Apache 2.0.x is great, but all the major modules are having
Has anyone successfully built a mod_coldfusion.so for Apache 2
and Linux?
We've just moved to RedHat 8.0 and had to regress back to
Apache 1.3.27 (which we had to build ourselves) because
Macromedia has elected not to provide support of the
prior release on the current, more secure, Apache
web
http://home.nextron.ch/coldfusion/
I believe this is the one you said you had problems with, though.
At 08:42 AM 11/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Has anyone successfully built a mod_coldfusion.so for Apache 2
and Linux?
We've just moved to RedHat 8.0 and had to regress back to
Apache 1.3.27
Greg,
Not really fair for a harsh demand like that. Does Netscape support
version 4 of their browser? Probably not anymore. Does Microsoft support
version 4 of their browser anymore? Definitely not. Their answers will
most likely be upgrade to our latest and greatest! Why would
and the nextron thing is just for windows I believe, not linux.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Jeffry Houser wrote:
http://home.nextron.ch/coldfusion/
I believe this is the one you said you had problems with, though.
At 08:42 AM 11/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Has anyone successfully built a
At 09:39 AM 11/6/02 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg,
Not really fair for a harsh demand like that.
Perfectly fair.
Does Netscape support version 4 of their browser? Probably not anymore.
Does Microsoft support version 4 of their browser anymore? Definitely not.
What a lame-brained
(Note: Microsoft still patches older releases of SQL Server.)
the last publically available service pack for what i would consider old
sql server--6.5--is sp5a and was done up in dec-1998 to jan-1999. its still
available but not been updated. and i'd think you'd be even harder pressed
to find
Does Netscape support version 4 of their browser? Probably not anymore.
Does Microsoft support version 4 of their browser anymore?
Definitely not.
What a lame-brained analogy. Todd, there is a VAST difference between
Besides which, both of these are FREE.
What a lame-brained analogy. Todd, there is a VAST difference between
a browser (i.e. CLIENT) and a SERVER. CF is a server, one upon which large,
complex, business systems are built. Companies who want to compete
in that arena don't just abandon support of earlier releases.
(Note: Microsoft
I am totally confused, I just took a quick peak at this thread - but how
does a patch for sql server have anything to do with Apache 2 support for
CF5/Linux?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hastings [mailto:paul;tei.or.th]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re
Again. I am totally confused.
-Original Message-
From: Craig Thomas [mailto:craig;januzzithomas.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:10 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux?
Does Netscape support version 4 of their browser? Probably not anymore
Paul Hastings wrote:
(Note: Microsoft still patches older releases of SQL Server.)
the last publically available service pack for what i would consider old
sql server--6.5--is sp5a and was done up in dec-1998 to jan-1999. its still
available but not been updated. and i'd think you'd be even
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't Apache 2 still considered beta? If it's not considered beta
anymore, then why is Apache 1.3.x still being maintained?
apache 2 is not considered beta anymore.
Why is 1.3 still being maintained? Because the ASF knows that some
people do not want to do a major
Greg's point of view was they're both 'servers' (read: not client apps)
~Todd
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Rob Rohan wrote:
I am totally confused, I just took a quick peak at this thread - but how
does a patch for sql server have anything to do with Apache 2 support for
CF5/Linux?
-Original
Isn't Apache 2 still considered beta?
No, Apache 2 is gold, and is the recommended platform according to the
Apache Group. This is especially true if you're running Apache on Windows -
Apache 1.3.x was always considered beta quality on Windows by the Apache
Group.
If it's not considered beta
Yeah, and the latest and greatest apache is 2.0.43 ... and, until
Macromedia figures out what to do to resolve the magic number that
continues to keep changing, nothing can be done about that. Vern
mentioned that they are working on it (for the next updater?)
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Dave Watts
Yeah, and the latest and greatest apache is 2.0.43 ...
and, until Macromedia figures out what to do to resolve
the magic number that continues to keep changing, nothing
can be done about that. Vern mentioned that they are
working on it (for the next updater?)
According to previous posts
We've figured out what to do, just trying to get it all ship-shape to get it out to ya!
-Vern
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:todd;web-rat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Any word on Apache 2 support for CF5/Linux
On Wednesday, Nov 6, 2002, at 15:29 US/Pacific, Dave Watts wrote:
There are a lot of people sticking with Apache 1.3.x, as far as I can
tell.
Last I heard there were still compatibility issues with mod_perl and
Apache 2.0.x (and some other modules I believe)? That's why we're
moving to a
Howdy --
We have CF5Pro working fine on one of our Linux machines, and in the process of
preparing for an upgrade to MX, we've
installed CF5 (from the same installation package) on another one of our Linux
machines. (This latter installation will
be a testbed for testing the upgrade to MX
Hey folks,
I'm encountering a strange problem that maybe some of you have run into before.
Config: CF5, linux 7.2, Apache/CF5 EAPI module, mysql
I have one template that runs many times a minute. However, under cfstat, a thread
running this
template seems to hang somewhat randomly -- every
/linux problem
Hey folks,
I'm encountering a strange problem that maybe some of you have run into
before.
Config: CF5, linux 7.2, Apache/CF5 EAPI module, mysql
I have one template that runs many times a minute. However, under cfstat,
a thread running this
template seems to hang somewhat
For those of you running CF on Linux or FreeBSD's Linux?
Happy? it's ready for prime time?
Any success on FreeBSD 4.x's Linux compatibility?
What about success in using PostrgeSQL ?
thanks
Len
http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.4 for NT4 W2K
28 matches
Mail list logo
