Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-04 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Kevin Graeme wrote: BTW, as of Win2K Windows authentication is largely based on Kerberos, with a few extensions. So if you use Integrated Windows Security, you are using Kerberos for browser authentication already. Interesting. Now that you mention it I do seem to recall now hearing some

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-03 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Michael Dinowitz wrote: checking amount of attempts per IP - ip can be forged I'm not sure what you mean by this. If an HTTP request is coming from my There's connection and reported connection IP. I remember back in the days there was a security bug in CFHTTP where you could 'control' the IP

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-03 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Kevin Graeme wrote: This has always been a problem with the web.Not only do you not have physical security of the device, you can not even be sure that it is the device you are thinking it may be. Isn't this kind of thing exactly what Kerberos was designed for? It is one of the things that

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-03 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Friday 03 Oct 2003 03:49 am, Michael Dinowitz wrote: You can fake the reported IP. I had mentioned this as a possible spam thing and I've actually seen it in the wild with spam from 2 different places. checking amount of attempts per IP - ip can be forged You can't fake an IP and

RE: security flaw in web services

2003-10-03 Thread Dave Watts
I can pull up some posts sent to a closed list from a few years back where there was an issue with CFHTTP. Seems that you could forge what would show up in the CGI vars using it. That 'feature' was yanked really fast. There's 2 different things here. The first is the reported information

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-03 Thread John Paul Ashenfelter
Ashenfelter CTO/Transitionpoint [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Michael Dinowitz To: CF-Talk Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 5:51 PM Subject: security flaw in web services It looks to me like there's a problem with web services, specifically the ones that allow logins

RE: security flaw in web services

2003-10-03 Thread Dave Watts
There's connection and reported connection IP. I remember back in the days there was a security bug in CFHTTP where you could 'control' the IP that was reported in the CGI vars. That would be purely dependent on your web server, even if there were a way to write a specific header. I don't

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-03 Thread Kevin Graeme
It's been a while since I've muddled with Kerberos so I don't know if there's a clean way to handle it for a web application. I know there are clients you can install that will handle the tickets, but I don't know what it would take to integrate them on the client side with the browser.

security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Michael Dinowitz
It looks to me like there's a problem with web services, specifically the ones that allow logins. Basically, a username/password is sent to the service and it responds with data if the person is a valid user. What stops someone from using the web service again and again to test a un/pw until they

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Jim Campbell
Isn't this, essentially, the same security weakness that would be an issue with anything that requires a username/password?If my pair is jim/jim1 it'll be easy to crack, but even jim/!iz+$8,9#qlww is going to be considerably harder to muscle. What about disabling access from account jim if I

RE: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Angel Stewart
So then what would be a foolproof way to secure them? -Gel -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It looks to me like there's a problem with web services, specifically the ones that allow logins. Basically, a username/password is sent to the service and

RE: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Nathan Strutz
they're sending login information to. -nathan strutz -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:52 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: security flaw in web services It looks to me like there's a problem with web services, specifically

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Michael Dinowitz wrote: It looks to me like there's a problem with web services, specifically the ones that allow logins. Basically, a username/password is sent to the service and it responds with data if the person is a valid user. What stops someone from using the web service again and again

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Nathan Strutz wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this a flaw in any HTTP based login system? Why would HTTP be any more vulnerable as other protocols? Jochem [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

RE: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Dave Watts
It looks to me like there's a problem with web services, specifically the ones that allow logins. Basically, a username/password is sent to the service and it responds with data if the person is a valid user. What stops someone from using the web service again and again to test a un/pw

RE: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Andy Ousterhout
Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 4:52 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: security flaw in web services It looks to me like there's a problem with web services, specifically the ones that allow logins. Basically, a username/password is sent

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Bryan Stevenson
www.macromedia.com - Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group Founder Director www.cfug-vancouverisland.com - Original Message - From: Michael Dinowitz To: CF-Talk Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:51 PM Subject: security flaw

RE: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Stacy Young
But whats to stop anyone from trying endless user/pass combinations for any type of login?;-) But ssl is a must if the info is sensitve. Stace _ From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 2, 2003 5:52 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: security flaw in web services

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Kevin Graeme
This has always been a problem with the web.Not only do you not have physical security of the device, you can not even be sure that it is the device you are thinking it may be. Isn't this kind of thing exactly what Kerberos was designed for? It's been a while since I've muddled with Kerberos

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Michael Dinowitz
You can fake the reported IP. I had mentioned this as a possible spam thing and I've actually seen it in the wild with spam from 2 different places. checking amount of attempts per IP - ip can be forged You can't fake an IP and expect TCP/IP to work. Jochem [Todays Threads] [This

RE: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Matthew Walker
But surely that's email only - not web pages? -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 3 October 2003 2:49 p.m. To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: security flaw in web services You can fake the reported IP. I had mentioned this as a possible spam

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Michael Dinowitz
checking amount of attempts per IP - ip can be forged I'm not sure what you mean by this. If an HTTP request is coming from my There's connection and reported connection IP. I remember back in the days there was a security bug in CFHTTP where you could 'control' the IP that was reported in the

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Michael Dinowitz
- not web pages? -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 3 October 2003 2:49 p.m. To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: security flaw in web services You can fake the reported IP. I had mentioned this as a possible spam thing and I've actually seen

Re: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Jim McAtee
Message - From: Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:00 PM Subject: Re: security flaw in web services I can pull up some posts sent to a closed list from a few years back where there was an issue with CFHTTP. Seems that you could

RE: security flaw in web services

2003-10-02 Thread Peter Tilbrook
- From: Jim McAtee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 3 October 2003 2:22 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: security flaw in web services But what's this have to do with your login security flaw idea?Sure, client IP addresses are easily forged.Using this capability to crack even a simple login