Re: [freenet-chat] Question - Windoze Email Clients

2001-10-20 Thread Michael
I use Mozilla under both Windows and Linux quite often and am generally very happy with it's mailing program. "All the best people in life seem to like LINUX." --Steve Wozniak *^*^*^* Michael McGlothlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mlug.missouri.edu/~mogmios/projects/ On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, David M

Re: [freenet-chat] Question - Windoze Email Clients

2001-10-20 Thread Don Marti
begin David McNab quotation of Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 04:17:47PM +1300: > Does anyone know of a good Windows email client that can read email sent > from linux clients without having to open them as attachments? You probably have a problem reading mail from wiseasses, not a problem reading mail se

Re: [freenet-chat] Question - Windoze Email Clients

2001-10-20 Thread Glenn McGrath
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 16:17:47 +1300 "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know of a good Windows email client that can read email sent > from linux clients without having to open them as attachments? > Any idea which linux mail clients are causing you problems, or what about the

[freenet-chat] Question - Windoze Email Clients

2001-10-20 Thread David McNab
Does anyone know of a good Windows email client that can read email sent from linux clients without having to open them as attachments? ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat

[freenet-chat] (no subject)

2001-10-20 Thread scum
I on the other hand agree with the student. Ever since the rodney king beating, filesharing has been something really ugly for me. Just like being a vegan eating meat. Oh god, why this pain, why But still there are good and law abiding citizens on the net. I like to watch home made flash movies an

Re: [freenet-chat] Slashdot needs Freenet category with Hops

2001-10-20 Thread Michael
> Centralization. While it's not so bad if a better machine does a > little more work, it get's bad when that same machine is getting > requests from half the network. Wouldn't that be more a problem of routing requests than saying it is horrible if you want your node to have more data? I can se

Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-20 Thread Timm Murray
> >Copyright and IP rights are legalized theft from the > >public of a idea or piece of work. > > So obtaining a few million of investment to create a > cure for a cancer, and patenting that cure in order to > ensure re-payment of that investment is theft from the > public? Even though that retur

Re:[freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-20 Thread Timm Murray
You are SO RIGHT! I give up my Freenet-loving ways and it's vvil hypocrisy. Copyrights are the only way people will ever make money, and of course the RIAA should be allowed to break into anybody's computer and delete anything they see fit. I REPENT, OH GREAT MARTIN CHAO!!! > Hello ever

Re: [freenet-chat] Slashdot needs Freenet category with Hops

2001-10-20 Thread Timm Murray
> > > I haven't seen _any_ compelling argument why above-average nodes > > > should attract more than their "fair share" of requests. What's > > > yours? > > > > Over time, the large node simply accumulates more data from Freenet. > > This means there should be more nodes which point to data on

Re: [freenet-chat] Slashdot needs Freenet category with Hops

2001-10-20 Thread Timm Murray
Now you've got it :) Yes, you're right that artificaly limiting the size of the store is a bad idea (zero-one- infinity rule), but that doesn't stop us from advocating that people keep their store size down. Setting the datasource diffrently when overloaded is an intresting idea. I'll have to

Re: [freenet-chat] Slashdot needs Freenet category with Hops

2001-10-20 Thread Timm Murray
> Timm Murray: > > Over time, the large node simply accumulates more data from Freenet. This means > > there should be more nodes which point to data on the large node. Thus, there will > > be more requests routed to the large node. > > Uhh... so? The node's big; it can handle lots of requests

Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-20 Thread Ian Clarke
Perhaps someone should contact the teacher who gave him this assignment and let them know about Martin's research methodology... > > I hope some of you are the victims of the next > > terrorist attacks. I actually hope some of YOU are Ian. PGP signature

Re: [freenet-chat] yet more "Real Programmers"

2001-10-20 Thread g'o'tz ohnesorge
Michael wrote: > I can't stand Java. It runs slowly on most my machines, is a pain to > install (compared to other langs I use), is more painful than most > languages to develop (steps it takes to write code and then test it), and > byte code is a stupid method of transfering code over the Net (O

Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-20 Thread Michael
> > I hope some of you are the victims of the next > > terrorist attacks. I actually hope some of YOU are > > killed by them. > > Holy lord. And this is the same man who calls Freenet developers "pathetic." > I guess, in this kind of terminology, I would find no word strong enough to > describe o

Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-20 Thread Michael
I now think we should legalize post-college abortions. It'd be a relief for his poor mother I'm sure. "All the best people in life seem to like LINUX." --Steve Wozniak *^*^*^* Michael McGlothlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mlug.missouri.edu/~mogmios/projects/ On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, David McNab wro

Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-20 Thread Glenn McGrath
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 04:12:57 -0700 (PDT) "martin chao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hope some of you are the victims of the next > terrorist attacks. I actually hope some of YOU are > killed by them. Perhaps then the rest of you will wake > up and discover reality. Dont attempt to take the hig

Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-20 Thread Glenn McGrath
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 04:24:25 -0700 (PDT) "martin chao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Copyright and IP rights are legalized theft from the > >public of a idea or piece of work. > > So obtaining a few million of investment to create a > cure for a cancer, and patenting that cure in order to > ensu

Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-20 Thread Stefan Reich
From: "martin chao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I hope some of you are the victims of the next > terrorist attacks. I actually hope some of YOU are > killed by them. Holy lord. And this is the same man who calls Freenet developers "pathetic." I guess, in this kind of terminology, I would find no word s

Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-20 Thread moritz
martin chao (Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 04:24:25AM -0700): > >Copyright and IP rights are legalized theft from the > >public of a idea or piece of work. > > So obtaining a few million of investment to create a > cure for a cancer, and patenting that cure in order to > ensure re-payment of that investme

Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-20 Thread David McNab
From: "martin chao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm now unsubscribing from this list. Good bye and > good riddens to you scum. I shudder to imagine what kind of childhood he had :( David ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproje

Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-20 Thread martin chao
>Copyright and IP rights are legalized theft from the >public of a idea or piece of work. So obtaining a few million of investment to create a cure for a cancer, and patenting that cure in order to ensure re-payment of that investment is theft from the public? Even though that return on investmen

Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-20 Thread martin chao
> Kiddie porn is free speach. I rest my case. So let me get this right. You developers actually support this shit? You believe freedom of speech allows you to rip off software and distribute kiddie porn? And I thought liberals had a problem with people who design nuclear bombs. How is this ANY