ot; server would not have a traffic of xGiB+ per month
maybe make an HTTP-AUTH that always returns "access prohibited"?
___
chat mailing list
chat@freenetproject.org
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
going to make it hard to hide stuff...
>
>On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:26:27PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> Jonathan Doe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>=20
>> > Would it be possible to encapsulate the freenet packet traffic in HTTP =
> and=20
>> > route it thro
>carrying freenet protocol data
hm, does "content-encoding: gzip" support passworded gzips?
just my 0,02¬
___
chat mailing list
chat@freenetproject.org
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mple monthly mail sent to the maillist will be
enought (IMHO, of course)
In any case my donation will arrive shortly
Ciao. Marco
--
+ Il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco ---+
* the Freenet Project - follow the white rabbit*
* Marco A. Calamari[EMAIL PRO
lug the Big Brother |
| Marco A. Calamari [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:// www.marcoc.it |
| DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B |
+ PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 --+
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
While I'm no fan of the DMCA but what in the first amendment do you think
prohibits that?
The DMCA is well worded to side step most 1st amendment issues.
Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> &
;s easier to send the orders then
try to comply with them I think they would win in the long run.
"Can you cite an example where it is clearly demonstrated that private ppl who run a
server and offer a service, do not fall under the protection of an ISP?"
Perhaps you remember the
are asking about
is not enough. I'd say it would only be concealing if they asked you directly and you
lied. There needs to be an action that you preformed before it becomes concealment.
Inaction won't get you in trouble in this case.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Again, it's not so much that the freenet node is illegal itself. Just that
transmitting illegal material is against the law.
Yes they still have to prove their case. Which means proving that the transfer took
place.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
prohibited by law.
I would wager that freenet has nothing to worry about from a country prosecutor in
Alabama. Freenet is still a very safe system and it would take the resources of an
organization like the NSA to gain any useful evidence from it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[m
hts. Not being able to remove them probably wouldn't hurt
their case much.
This write up by the Florida Bar covers both those issues.
http://www.flabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/JNJournal01.nsf/0/a79cab7e1a590ea585256e7f005f57d3?OpenDocument
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
th 100% certainty that your transmitting
something illegal won't protect you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 7:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] S
624opn.html
It's not just enough to fail to report it. You'd have too conceal it too.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 6:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [freenet-chat] Re: [free
Zenon Panoussis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Matthew Findley wrote:
>
> > This message contains improperly-formatted binary content, or attachment.
>
> Hotmail sucks. I sends 8-bit content without the right
> "Content-transfer-encoding: 8-bit" he
claiming an affirmative defense the bruden falls to you to prove that it's true.
I'm not sure what level your required to prove it to beyond a reasonable doubt or
preponderance of the evidence. But it's still up to you to prove it.
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PRO
can't even be charged with not stopping yourself from committing a crime
(negligence crimes not withstanding). You'd just be charged with what ever crime you
committed.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon
ccasionally wrong word.
But you are rude with people that decide to use their time
to read your mail. Just read what you wrote before sending it.
Never heard of the word "netiquette" ?
M.
>
> Michael Kuijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > I hate t
prise they will pass laws that prevent you from doing it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 3:27 PM
To: Findley, Matthew; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Showdown at
There has been only one company (that I
can think of anyway) that actively took part in their network, Napster. And we all
know what happened to them.
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 2:52 PM
T
that way. (Guns,
knives, cars, video cameras, computers... ect)
Until (god forbid) the INDUCE act passes your free to make what ever you want. But
that doesn't mean you can use it however you want.
Show me a case where the person uploading music has won.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAI
o to your local library for 100% anonymity.
And the government decides what is legal; they are the only ones that can. Congress
makes the laws. The courts enforces them. Simple as that.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Scheffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RE: anon
the hard drive, even
if its the cure for cancer.
You can't hide behind the fact that most of your deeds are good deeds, if you can't
stop the bad deeds you can't do any of it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTE
would find it laughable.
People do have the right to communicate with out government oversight everywhere,
including the internet.
If all you do is communicate legal information anonymously then there is an
alternative, its called the world wide web.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
tting illegal material are already on the books and have been affirmed many
times.
PS: Bounced to chat as per toad's request
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 12:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
can rape,
murder, and pillage as long as you don't know with 100% certainty that your committing
a crime.
The president/prime minster question was rhetorical. (I'm not fan of Bush either by
the way)
I normally don't read it either.
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PRO
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 10:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [freenet-support] Showdown at the Freenode Coral
Importance: Low
Mr Matthew Findley
You made certain claims on this
s to chat instead of support
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE: anonymity(NOT)
Importance: Low
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:24:35
ething that may help illustrate my point better. Its the definition of
criminal facilitation.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/nycodes/c82/a25.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL P
; Look here:
> http://iip.meshmx.com/iip/
> or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED],JD2L-DGN~nAZTqVI2PCIkg/iiprevival/6//
> (SSK at REMsW1qIViD71EovZVsZPy5mZUoPAgM,JD2L-DGN~nAZTqVI2PCIkg/iiprevival/6//)
>
> Have fun!
--
+ il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco+
* the Freene
s.
Not a single word you wrote admitted that this time this was not
done, and that this was a mistake (IMHO, of course).
What is the purpose of [ANNOUNCE] maillist that most of
software project (including Freenet) has ? Just to
announce 0.x releases ?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >&g
30 matches
Mail list logo
