On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 07:53:21 -0600
"Mark J Roberts" wrote:
> Kevin Atkinson:
> > What does the Internet really mean? It means uncensored instant
> > access to any sort of information.
>
> The Internet means no such thing. The notion that the development of
> technology will thwart censorship is
> > Your government has 25% of the worlds prison population.
>
> Probably because our cops and prosecutors are better than yours.
Separately,> we lock up far to many non violent drug offenders. Add that
together and we> have too many prisoners. But 25% of the world's
population has to be a wrong>
haha, at least now i know you wernt being serious, i shouldnt have been
suckered in by your troll.
___
Chat mailing list
Chat at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
> For some reason I usually side with republicans when it comes to
foreign> policy. Hmmm...
The really sad thing about this whole WTO/Afghanistan issue is that the
US still hasnt learn from its mistakes.
If the US is going to throw their weight around internatioanlly (like
they have for the las
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 20:37:12 -0600
"Mark J Roberts" wrote:
> Travis Bemann:
> > government is amoral and has no ethics
>
> Why, then, does our government punish criminals and not innocent
> people? Why does it fight murderous totalitarian communism, and not
> wage war on democracy and our free ma
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:47:55 -0800
"Josh" wrote:
> How can a democratic government be immoral? Perhaps you only focus on
the> things our government does wrong, which I admit is a lot, but
perhaps you> should consider that all governments do things wrong, and
only in America do> we have the press e
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 18:06:35 -0700
krepta at juno.com wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 20:30:19 +1100 Glenn McGrath
> writes:
> > On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 17:54:49 -0800
> > "Josh" wrote:
> >
> > > Is spam free speech?
> > >
> >
>
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 17:54:49 -0800
"Josh" wrote:
> Is spam free speech?
>
I think everybody wants to answer NO, but i think it is free speech.
Just because people dont like the message or the person who sent it
doesnt mean the message should be illegal.
Most people arent capable of thinking r
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 16:17:47 +1300
"David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know of a good Windows email client that can read email
sent
> from linux clients without having to open them as attachments?
>
Any idea which linux mail clients are causing you problems, or what
about the
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 04:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
"martin chao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope some of you are the victims of the next
> terrorist attacks. I actually hope some of YOU are
> killed by them. Perhaps then the rest of you will wake
> up and discover reality.
Dont attempt to take the hig
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 04:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
"martin chao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Copyright and IP rights are legalized theft from the
> >public of a idea or piece of work.
>
> So obtaining a few million of investment to create a
> cure for a cancer, and patenting that cure in order to
> ensu
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 17:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
"martin chao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You people actually believe the constitution gives you
> the right to distribute porn and other people's
> software. To quote you: "copyrights are a violation of
> free speech."
There are lots of constitutions in
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 18:14:38 -0700
"coderman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You cannot control the flow of digital information in
> large peer networks without totalitarion control over
> every router/switch and fool proof identity at the
> ISP.
>
> At one point it was illegal to sell alcohol.
13 matches
Mail list logo
