[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS

2001-07-27 Thread Timm Murray
- Original Message - From: "Josh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:57 PM Subject: RE: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS > I never responded to this email, and am not a member of this email group > anymore (want to be, but have to manage my inbox). So he

[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS

2001-07-26 Thread Timm Murray
Yes, I'm sorry. I hadn't read too far down in my e-mail when I sent that off. I've already started posting all further things on this subject to the chat list. - Original Message - From: "Oskar Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 11:44 AM

[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS

2001-07-25 Thread Timm Murray
- Original Message - From: "Josh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:09 PM Subject: RE: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS > Shareware! That may be a better title. It will be open source > shareware...??? > > It's really a management issue: I want to advanta

[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS

2001-07-25 Thread Timm Murray
Call it whatever you want, just not "Open Source" and definatly not "Free Software". "Managed Source" sounds a lot like "Shared Source". (Sorry aboutt the previous messages to devl; I'm putting all further messages on chat). - Original Message - From: "Josh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EM

Re: [freenet-chat] RE: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS

2001-07-25 Thread Timm Murray
- Original Message - From: "Josh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'toad'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:41 PM Subject: [freenet-chat] RE: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS > You need to read the UNI ID des

[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS

2001-07-24 Thread Rob Cakebread
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 07:09 pm, you wrote: > Shareware! That may be a better title. It will be open source > shareware...??? The reason I suggest 'shareware' is because the license is so restrictive it may as well be shareware. > I know, Ill call it "not open source", and I'll distribute the

[freenet-chat] RE: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS

2001-07-24 Thread Josh
Thanks. I'm taking a Gillette approach. MFS is free, so long as UNI ID is used, and MFS cant function without a central authentication authority. So they are really 2 symbiotic designs. I know that I can register a credit card to a po box, using a borrowed identity, and have email forwarding that

Re: [freenet-chat] RE: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS

2001-07-24 Thread Rob Cakebread
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 07:41 pm, you wrote: > You need to read the UNI ID design. Tell me how they are going to get > somebody's info. Where is this design? All the links seem to be broken except the license and dream pages. > All it stores is an incomplete credit card number, and an email ad

[freenet-chat] RE: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS

2001-07-24 Thread Josh
You need to read the UNI ID design. Tell me how they are going to get somebody's info. All it stores is an incomplete credit card number, and an email address. They can give a hotmail address, and execute their warrants on visa and mastercard. They will need to do brute force. As for the Chinese

[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-devl] MercuryFS

2001-07-24 Thread toad
Taken to freenet-chat, for obvious reasons. On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:09:34PM -0700, Josh wrote: > Shareware! That may be a better title. It will be open source > shareware...??? > > It's really a management issue: I want to advantages of open source, with > the advantages of management, and I'