Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
>
> Really??? So, if I am looking for a used one, about $500 +/- then huh?
> That sounds like a good route to take. M22 would be very nice to have...
>
> Thanks again!
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
Graham,
I seen an ad in the local Penny Saver that read: M22 trans $600. Thought
it sounded like a good price, but I don't know anything about them. I can
dig up the nu
> Sent by: cc:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subjec
use of the noise from the 'crusher. I always laughed and told
'em they just don't make them like they used to.
Josh
>From: "Herbert Lumpp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] m20
6
>From: "Graham Wooden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] m20 / m21 Transmissions
>Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:35:59 -0500
>
>
>Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing L
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List]
m20 / m21 Transmissions
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
My 383 is going to put out about 590 to 600 Ft pounds of torque with
about 520 horses. And I know that the 3 speed Sag will be shredded to
dust once I pop the clutch.
I g
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
I would run the M22 rock crusher. since this tranny was used behind some
high torgue big blocks. I cant seem to think that a 383 would make much
more torque than a mild big
You can spot a Saginaw a mile away. They are cast iron instead of aluminum like the Muncies.
Larry
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
>If you want to stay with a 4-spd, an alternative to the Muncie is the
>Richmond Super T-10. You can even choose your ratios. I think they cost
>$1200-1500. It's a bit p
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
>Keep in mind that M20, M21, and M22 are RPO numbers, not tranmission
>model numbers. Some of the M20 4-speeds mated to lo-po engines were
>Saginaws and not Muncies so if
At 01:29 PM 11/22/2001, you wrote:
KELLY:
m20 is the wide ratio. m21 and m22 are close ratio. the main difference
between a m21 and m22 is the main gearset.the transmission utilizes a
stronger alloy steel along with a straighter helix angle on the
main gearset. this straight angle gearset was us
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
>
> I noticed that the m20's are cheaper.
> Any major diff's between the m20 and the m21? Like mounting, gear types,
> etc...
>
>
There are two M20's, 63-65 and 66-74. Th
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
Graham wrote:
> I noticed that the m20's are cheaper.
> Any major diff's between the m20 and the m21? Like mounting, gear types,
> etc...
Keep in mind that M20, M21, and M
KELLY:
m20 is the wide ratio. m21 and m22 are close ratio. the main difference between a m21 and m22 is the main gearset.the transmission utilizes a stronger alloy steel along with a straighter helix angle on the main gearset. this straight angle gearset was used to produce less thrust load, and u
1 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] m20 / m21 Transmissions
>
> Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
>
>
>
> >Kelly says the m21 and the m22 are the good ones. The m22's are pretty
any GM car will work fine, except
for a few minor tweaks...
Thanks again all and happy turkey day...
- Original Message -
From: "396guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 11:18 AM
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-List] m20 / m21 Tra
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
>If I remember correctly, the M-22 uses "straight cut" gears instead of
>helical cut gears as in the M-21. That's where the "Rock Crusher" name
>comes from because the str
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
Hey Kelly,
If I remember correctly, the M-22 uses "straight cut" gears instead of
helical cut gears as in the M-21. That's where the "Rock Crusher" name
comes from because
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
>Must be our day Kelly. I agree with this one too. The Saginaw wasn't
>designed for hp/torque. Any M20 (wide ratio) or M21/M22 (close ratio)
>should handle the load.
Wh
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
> That's a lot of torque for any stock trannyI do know that
> rock crushers
> (m22's) and M-21's were both put behind factory BB motors and
> high hp small
> blocks with
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
>Kelly says the m21 and the m22 are the good ones. The m22's are pretty
>expensive, maybe I will look around for a m21.
I'll keep my eyes open for yaevery once in awhi
good ones. The m22's are pretty
expensive, maybe I will look around for a m21.
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Means" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] m20 / m21 Transmis
ssage -
From: "Graham Wooden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:05 PM
Subject: [Chevelle-List] m20 / m21 Transmissions
>
> Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
>
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
>Well, I have started to think about the transmission part of my elky.
>Currently, there is the stock 3-speed Saginaw, but I am affraid that the 383
>stroker will shred it
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
Folks,
Well, I have started to think about the transmission part of my elky.
Currently, there is the stock 3-speed Saginaw, but I am affraid that the 383
stroker will shred
26 matches
Mail list logo
