The mode arguments are documented
http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Module%20scheme#ports
-elf
On 24 August 2023 19:55:35 GMT+03:00, Lewis Levin
wrote:
>After installing r7rs, ‘open-output-port’ is a more complete implementation
>with this signature:
>
>open-output-file name . mode
Thanks! I'll try to look into it and run some tests and speed comparisons in
about a week. (Lots of weddings right now, so it's unlikely i can do anything
earlier than that.) Have you made bindings for all the hashes and block ciphers?
-elf
On 11 June 2023 02:59:23 GMT+03:00, Thomas Chust
, so...
-elf
On 23 March 2023 13:43:10 GMT+02:00, Matt Welland
wrote:
>Tk is great, no doubt about it. I still miss Eric Gallesio's STk. The
>reasons I decided against tk include:
>
> 1. Clunky 1980's look and feel. (i)
> 2. No IOS or Android support. (ii)
> 3. I seemed t
Erm, what's wrong with the tk bindings, which should work everywhere already?
-elf
On 23 March 2023 02:36:43 GMT+02:00, Matt Welland
wrote:
>That would be great Thomas. For my part, I'll start working on my project
>using what I can, learning Godot along the way. When you get to w
be a better development methodology
that wouldn't shift the burden from paying attention to what one is using to a
psychic programme that does what you mean (not what you tell it).
-elf
On 20 November 2022 20:55:09 GMT+02:00, Lassi Kortela wrote:
>I have a .egg file for a portable Scheme prog
it (painfully) obvious that I don't know anything
about AppImage, so if you can explain in more detail or send links to clarify,
it would be most appreciated.
Thanks!
-elf
From: Daniel Ziltener
To: chicken-users@nongnu.org
Date: 28 Sep 2022 22:37:59
Subject: Request for feedback: Chicken as a self
independent.)
-elf
On 26 November 2018 5:15:03 GMT+02:00, Matt Welland wrote:
>Isn't Termux similar to UserLand - a compatibility layer of sorts
>similar to LXC or LXD? If so, I would not be surprised to see
>incompatibilities. I had to do several hacks to get IUP working on
>UserLand.
>
with plants and apply them to cuts are which
doctors?
The ones who read entrails are clearly haruspex.
(That would be a great name for a debugging egg.)
-elf
who goes 'poof' and reappears on the list
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users
Should the chicken*scheme.* sites be updated to point to call-cc then?
-elf
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
Hi
We have a new server for the CHICKEN infrastructure:
http://www.call-cc.org
www.call-with-current-continuation.org is still the official CHICKEN
home site
such a nice project!
Best wishes.
Mario
Minus fourscore and threescore ten years ago, our Felix brought forth a new
implementation, concieved in poultry, and dedicated to the proposition that all
CONS are created equal time.
Happy birthday, Chicken!
-elf
project!
Best wishes.
Mario
Minus fourscore and threescore ten years ago, our Felix brought forth a
new implementation, concieved in poultry, and dedicated to the proposition
that all CONS are created equal time.
Happy birthday, Chicken!
-elf
in this way?
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
perhaps the addition of a let-syntax would be useful above the internal
syntax-rules?
-elf
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Michele Simionato wrote:
I have subscribed again the list after a few years of absence, because I wanted
to try the new and improved hygienic Chicken ;-)
As first experiment, I
ignore previous comment
-elf
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Michele Simionato wrote:
I have subscribed again the list after a few years of absence, because I wanted
to try the new and improved hygienic Chicken ;-)
As first experiment, I tried to stress a bit syntax-rules. I tried the following
are you counting '() (the empty list) as an atom or not? in lisp it
traditionally isnt an atom, but your definition below indicates it is.
-elf
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, John Cowan wrote:
These are some very old Lisp puzzles I dug up and translated to Scheme.
The idea is to figure out what
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Alex Queiroz wrote:
snip
I am not agreeing with Apple at all, but they might be afraid of GC pauses.
how would they know its a gc pause? it would just look like a bunch of memory
accesses to them.
-elf
___
Chicken
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Alex Queiroz wrote:
Hallo,
On 4/13/09, Elf e...@ephemeral.net wrote:
I am not agreeing with Apple at all, but they might be afraid of GC
pauses.
how would they know its a gc pause? it would just look like a bunch of
memory
accesses to them
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Alex Queiroz wrote:
Hallo,
On 4/13/09, Elf e...@ephemeral.net wrote:
I am not agreeing with Apple at all, but they might be afraid of GC
pauses.
how would they know its a gc pause? it would just look like a bunch of
memory
accesses to them
The new trac instances run by Ivan are at www.chicken-scheme.org and
www.chickenscheme.org . Thanks be to Eric for the redirect.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Done. Praise be to Eric, who watcheth over the redirects.
-elf
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Alex Queiroz wrote:
Hallo,
On 4/7/09, Elf e...@ephemeral.net wrote:
The new trac instances run by Ivan are at www.chicken-scheme.org and
www.chickenscheme.org . Thanks be to Eric for the redirect
As soon as I can get ahold of Eric, we can give it one (or more) chicken
domain names :)
-elf
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Ivan Raikov wrote:
I have set up a Trac instance that is synchronized with the Chicken
SVN repository; however, it is installed on the web server of my
institute, because
Erm, i wasnt aware i was supposed to fix the msvc mess, as i dont have access
to a machine running msvc. i thought felix was working on msvc. sorry :)
-elf
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Leonardo Valeri Manera wrote:
\o/
... again!
\o/
Also: kitten-technologies? :3
Finally: elf, did you fix
word to the back of each word (eg
/a /b /foo bar/ c/ d/). this is not a problem in the chicken3 branch mingw
makefile, as i had fixed it previously.)
-elf
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Elf e...@ephemeral.net wrote:
no. what happened
no. what happened is that the quoting rules are screwed up. i forgot to
backport the makefile from 3. ill do it in a few.
(youre seeing what happens when the 'cat' or 'type' goes horribly wrong.
note how the slashes go from one side to the other.)
-elf
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Ivan
Sorry, i just realised i forgot to add the link to the page:
http://chicken.wiki.br/platforms-used
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
theoretically supported
by one of the build systems formerly used.) Can everyone please edit the
platforms-used wiki page and add their names and platform(s)/architecture(s)
used and/or desired, as a rough survey? Thanks very much!
-elf
___
Chicken-users
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
Elf e...@ephemeral.net writes:
I rather doubt AIX is in widespread use, although it's theoretically supported
by one of the build systems formerly used.
If you want build log, contact me, maybe I'll find a way.
You're running on AIX? (I
I'd like a copy of the build log, too, please.
-elf
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
Elf e...@ephemeral.net writes:
I rather doubt AIX is in widespread use, although it's theoretically supported
by one of the build systems formerly used.
If you want build log, contact me
um, changing to 644 is almost certainly incorrect for executables. methinks
you want 0755.
-elf
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Drake Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the short pre-message research time, but this seems bogus
enough
of issues, regardless.
again: canonical-path does not do existence checking. it is not meant to.
it is intended to create localised canonical forms of a path in any
representation as an aid to installation and naming portability.
-elf
___
Chicken
erm, have you looked at the remote-repl egg?
fwiw, i don't see why this is an issue at all... just send quoted lists
(stringified, of course), and eval it on whichever end is desired.
-elf
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Drake Wilson [EMAIL
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Peter Bex wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 01:19:42AM -0700, Elf wrote:
~$ touch abc\\298.test
csi (find-files . regular-file? (lambda (x y)(print x)
(print (file-stat (canonical-path x)
./abc\298.test
Error: (file-stat) cannot access file
Chicken, therefore, / is entirely portable and no
translation is ever necessary.
this is not strictly true; during installation of files (eg for chicken-setup)
some calls are done through the command shell. the / notation has certain
other concerns as well, mostly involving drive letter.
-elf
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, John Cowan wrote:
Elf scripsit:
In Windows,
\ and / are interchangeable in system calls, although the command shell,
the desktop, and other file windows and dialogue boxes don't accept \
but only /.
I should have said don't accept / but only \, of course
be better served by either explicit setting
procs for each let-bound var, or by having some form of dispatch from a
single name.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
/lmbk/abc/298.test
this isn't a bug; it has to handle both windows and unix paths. i can add
optional flags for specifying behaviour of slash and backslash, if desired.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Freitag, den 10.10.2008, 11:19 -0700 schrieb Elf:
i'd recommend the r5rs primitive 'write' instead of 'display', 'printf', etc,
if you want the external representation of your code. :)
That's what would have recommended until a few weeks
i'd recommend the r5rs primitive 'write' instead of 'display', 'printf', etc,
if you want the external representation of your code. :)
-elf
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Wietse Jacobs wrote:
2008/10/10 Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 04:04:13PM +0200, Wietse Jacobs wrote
fwiw, the dependency on numbers should probably be removed in eformat. i
believe thats the only external dependency it has?
-elf
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008, Matthew Welland wrote:
While I really like eformat I tend to use the format egg quite a bit. It has
no external dependancies and works
) the vast majority
of forms would get a fairly nasty slowdown in order to error for something
outside the spec.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
(at
commit), rather than via a periodical task. this could allow significantly
faster update of eggs when fixes are made, and give some added flexibilities.
if a scheme like this were implemented, getting the docs from the wiki would
actually be more of a pain than the upload...
-elf
the question
if '((test (a b ...) c ...) (test a c ...))' is valid, though. (or even
if the transformer was just 'a', for that matter.)
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
length.
i am confused. are you proposing that it should always signal an error when
getting the split ellipses like this, or when the lists are mismatched?
(the second case is a bit unpleasant to try to catch all the time, and would
probably have performance unplesantnesses.)
-elf
On Wed, 27 Aug
the code if interested.
-elf
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008, Jim Ursetto wrote:
Note that your solution effects a mapping of x - y, not from x - y
- #t. That gets the job accomplished correctly, but doesn't reflect
the original Perl code. For a fair comparison, you have to change the
perl code to match
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Tobia Conforto wrote:
Elf wrote:
(define a
(alist-hash-table
(let loop ((i 0))
(if (fx= 25 i)
'()
(cons (cons (random 50)
(random 50))
(loop (fx+ 1 i)
=))
for an improvement
. :)
im not necessarily sold on eggdoc itself, only because its amazingly annoying
to change certain properties (unlike the wiki, where they cant be changed at
all). i know that a few months back i said i would come up with something.
i totally dropped the ball here, apologies. im a bit swamped.
-elf
in Scheme, or failing that, something people
would have absolutely no preconceptions about.
clone-type would fit the latter description, or how about
make-duplicate-type?
I'll also propose transmogrify-type and
make-duplicate-with-ethicator-type.
a clone by any other name is no defeat.
-elf
, and more brittle when there are better options.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
my solution :) its faster (at least on chicken 3.3.something).
timing on this box put this at just under 8s.
-elf
---
(use extras)
(print filling ...)
(define a
(alist-hash-table
(let loop ((i 0))
(if (fx= 25 i)
'()
(cons (cons
faster to build the
list than to do the hash-table-set!, interestingly.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
unfold
for generation. all of these have been run in the interpreter, not compiled.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
one final note:
the time and memory usage for the list-tabulate, map!, and unfold solutions,
on my box, are approximately 0.4s slower than perl, with slightly better
memory usage stats (in chicken, that is).
hope this helps.
-elf
___
Chicken
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Montag, den 18.08.2008, 09:19 -0700 schrieb Elf:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
snip
as a sidenote, i cannot think of any legitimate reason to change timeouts
dynamically.
So you probably never had to debug a larger
#; is a very special sort of case. it would be a minimum of several lines
to perform syntax highlighting correctly with it.
give me a full list of whats missing from vim, and ill look at it. i dont
use vim, but i do use vi :)
-elf
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Wang Xin wrote:
2008/8/18 Tobia
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Aug 2008, at 3:53 am, Elf wrote:
many people on #chicken and the list have requested a simple remote-
repl
egg. some people have requested a not-so-simple remote-repl egg,
too. :)
Oh, yay
srfi-19 is broken in several ways right now and will be refactored soon.
-elf
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Hi Kon,
I ran into a problem with SRFI-19 formatting. (Being lazy) I'm not
(yet) using the chicken egg, but the version I made up years ago. Now I
found this bug
, which
happens automatically. if you're seriously proposing modifying all of the
output procedures, you're mad. if you need bignum support in the short term,
use the numbers egg. if you dont, wait until the compat lib is out, which
has a full numeric tower.
-elf
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Jörg F
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Hi Elf,
first of all: sorry about not having had the time to read your egg but
anyway asking questions about it.
please read the docs in the future, as this issue is addressed.
Actually having such a facility and not being able to use
the same macros written in un-hygienic define-macro
))
define-macro will no longer exist in chicken4 (aka hygienic chicken).
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
in embedded systems.
Any input/suggestions/knowledge would be much appreciated.
you want chicken to be the kernel?
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
modifications to the signal/condition/exception handler
in unsafe ways.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
in the
repl erroring out your whole process. all of that is handled under the hood,
even if you do use the hooks.
hope this satisfies the requests. let me know if it doesnt.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http
is
why is this not failing at the char-integer ?
-elf
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Joshua Griffith wrote:
The following lines demonstrate the problem:
(use s11n)
(deserialize (open-input-string \f))
-Josh
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:30 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Joshua
its not stable in the sense that most everything about ports will be changing
very soon because of problems with windows and certain other OSes.
-efl
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Hi all,
me again :-(
I'm inclined to use those undocumented arguments to make-input-port
ubuntu is using Chicken 2.4 or 2.5, thats why it doesnt work.
http://chicken.wiki.br/dev-snapshots/2008/08/07/chicken-3.3.8-linux-x86.tar.gz
is a linux binary. somewhere on the wiki theres a page with updated
debian packages.
-elf
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Montag
it a parameter. if you want
a thread-local variable, parametrise it. i dont see why this requires changing
core structure.
-elf
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Hi all,
since there where no more responses on my last post to this thread, I
decided that it might be the best
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 07:28 -0700 schrieb Elf:
absolutely not.
first, why will it be difficult for you to set up a clean build environment?
Because I'll have to rebind parameterize, which is then going to be
available to eval, where
with it. threads are neither
more flexible, more effective, safer, nor easier to work with.
Semantically, processes and threads differ because of the controller that
exists in one model (scheduler) that does not exist in the other.
-elf
terminating your threads since you bought them last week, boyy
.
theres also smart scheduling of threads, which im trying to work out.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
snip
is shared access to memory, which you can easily avoid.
Pipes are not that simple actually, to pass some complex structure
through pipe, you need to pack it to some
98) version of windows.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
(atm), functionality is a
good idea.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, John Cowan wrote:
Elf scripsit:
you cant take the car or cdr of an atomic object: the slots dont exist.
And yet in CL and all the way back to Lisp 1.5, (car nil) = (cdr nil) = nil.
In pre-CL Lisps, the CDR of a symbol was its property list; CL finally
abolished
new processes. There
are already all kinds of synchronisation and communication and distributed
programming eggs out there.
The blocking I/O issues will be cleaned up very shortly, and I agree they are
annoying. :)
-elf
(thread-terminate! [Chicken-Users]: re: thread-terminate!)
too bad
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, felix winkelmann wrote:
4) Make the worker thread check a global (or thread-local, but
accessible from outside)
status and let it terminate itself.
this is the way suggested in the srfi-18 docs, iirc, using the slot.
-elf
deprecate mutexes and the like for a cleaner system of currency, or
(at the very least) augment thread-terminate! in such a way that it waits to
terminate until the held mutexes (mutii? mutices?) are dropped.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken
#;1 (condition-case (with-input-from-string ) read) (var () no prob))
no prob
#;2 (condition-case (call-with-input-string ) read) (var () no prob))
no prob
#;3
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2008, 18:06 +0900 schrieb Ivan Raikov:
What version of
(condition-case (with-input-from-string ) read) (val () no prob))
no prob
#;4 (condition-case (call-with-input-string ) read) (val () no prob))
no prob
#;5
wasnt srfi-34.
-elf
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
ERR
Double checked: it's SRFI-34, which is in the way!
I
, disappeared apparently for a bit and therefore there was no
discussion. srfi-34 and related srfis are brittle and encode things in a
nonschemelike way, with a lot of extra parsing and ridiculousness involved.
-elf
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2008
furthermore, srfi-34 can be written entirely in terms of srfi-12, while the
reverse is not true.
-elf
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Elf wrote:
srfi-34 is meaningless without srfi-35 and srfi-36. nothing in srfi-34
details the actual format of exceptions/conditions. all of this is
self-contained
YAY! Grats Tony!
-elf
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or any other way you'd like, i think we're reached 400 eggs, with Ivan's
WebDAV egg and a SOAP egg contributed by someone who wishes to remain
anonymous
are you using the eval unit and using the repl function contained therein, or
did you roll your own repl? also, you should be able to require the
chicken-more-macros via (require 'chicken-more-macros) at the top.
-elf
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den
char
is also the next object.)
what exactly are you trying to do, if i may ask?
-elf
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 07:19 -0700 schrieb Elf:
are you using the eval unit and using the repl function contained
therein, or
did you roll your own
what do you mean by a 'pure scheme reader'?
-elf
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 16:53 +0200 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Unfortunately chicken's read has already read from the port until the
next #\( - so the SRFI-49 code gets confused
chicken already supports most of srfi-34 natively and the rest is supported
via an egg. have you looked at all at the manual or at the egg libs yet?
-elf
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Hi all,
I have some lines of Scheme, which rely on SRF-34 and I don't really
want
renaming etc are only listed once, under the current
name.
at the bottom is a list of eggs NOT included in the list, along with the
reason.
who is going to run the (random-seed) (random 50) script?
-elf
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Elf [EMAIL
install
etc from there. then it should only be a matter of copying that environment to
the actual phone.
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or any other way you'd like, i think we're reached 400 eggs, with Ivan's
WebDAV egg and a SOAP egg contributed by someone who wishes to remain
anonymous and added by myself. yay
or any other way you'd like, i think we're reached 400 eggs, with Ivan's
WebDAV egg and a SOAP egg contributed by someone who wishes to remain
anonymous and added by myself. yay!!!
-elf
who is looking forward to the next 400 eggs
___
Chicken
, and trying to add directories without borking other things in
such a way that any installed version of pkgconfig (opposed to ONLY 0.18 or
0.19 or 0.23 or whatever theyre on for this five months) will use it
correctly is damn near impossible.
-elf
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Peter Bex wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
is *not* duplication, as extra bits like
linked libraries need to be specified. i can draft a proposal for how to
fix things based on my own experiences both with the repo and with
chicken-setup, if people are interested.
-elf
___
Chicken-users
be another way.
chicken-setup -n
(will run chicken-setup against any .setup files it sees in the local
directory but will not install them. if you want them to be installed, it
should be just 'chicken-setup')
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
You're running readline in csi, yes? That blocks the threads.
-elf
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, William Xu wrote:
Run the following program in csi:
(use posix srfi-18)
(thread-start! (let ((max 5)
(i 0))
(letrec ((thunk (lambda
oke, so youre on osx and its blocking from stdin... i was not aware of this.
thank you. :)
-elf
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, William Xu wrote:
Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You're running readline in csi, yes? That blocks the threads.
I didn't install this egg.
,
| #;1 (use readline
How large is the generated C file when profiling is not enabled?
-elf
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Compile times of chicken increase considerably when adding -profile.
For example,
17 hours on a recent 2.4GHz processor instead of just some minutes
without -profile
Oh, and can you provide a link to the scheme source from which this happened?
Thanks.
-elf
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Compile times of chicken increase considerably when adding -profile.
For example,
17 hours on a recent 2.4GHz processor instead of just some minutes
are you inlining anything in the scheme source?
-elf
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:55:07 -0700 (PDT), elf wrote:
How large is the generated C file when profiling is not enabled?
Only 37MB compared to 1300MB with profiling.
(I cannot provide the Scheme
also, a 35X growth is not normal for profiling, and doesnt happen in the
general case, which is why i was asking to see your scheme source.
-elf
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:55:07 -0700 (PDT), elf wrote:
How large is the generated C file when profiling
are you converting from a symbol? if so, are you in case-insensitive or case-
sensitive mode? where are W1 and W2 being defined?
-elf
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, William Ramsay wrote:
Now I'm even more mystified. The only change I made to my code was to
change (char=? wa #\R) to (char-ci=? wa
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
