On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 19:22:29 + "Ricardo G. Herdt" wrote:
> I created a simple JSON-RPC implementation that I would like to
> share. @Mario, can you please add it to the coop?
>
> https://gitlab.com/rgherdt/scheme-json-rpc
Thanks, Ricardo. Your egg has been added to the coop.
> It's my firs
Hi Diego,
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:40:47 + Diego wrote:
> I've created an initial port of SRFI-144 that passes test-new-egg with
> release-info here:
>
> https://code.dieggsy.com/srfi-144/plain/srfi-144.release-info
>
> I'm thinking a next step might be to test the procedures with C
> equival
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:12:12 -0400 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
wrote:
> I'd like to announce (and add to the coop) a new egg, srfi-217,
> which provides an (alternate) implementation of integer sets based
> on big-endian radix trees.
>
> The documentation is at https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi
Hi Matt,
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 21:23:21 -0700 Matt Welland wrote:
> chicken install address-info ansi-escape-sequences apropos base64 crypt
> csv-abnf
> directory-utils filepath fmt format http-client
> intarweb json linenoise matchable md5 message-digest moremacros
> pathname-expand postgresql q
On Wed, 12 May 2021 18:53:42 +0200 Vasilij Schneidermann
wrote:
> The coding jam inspired me to look into GUI eggs again. I found a
> GTK-server [1]_ demo by Felix from 2005 [2]_, turned it into a
> gtk-server egg and ported all bundled examples. It may very well be the
> most advanced (though n
On Fri, 21 May 2021 11:00:35 -0400 Marc Feeley wrote:
>> On May 21, 2021, at 8:58 AM, Théo Cavignac wrote:
>>
>> I have been interested in this problem for other reasons, mainly
>> because I was interested in the possibility of installing eggs in
>> userspace while Chicken was installed through
Hi Matt,
On Thu, 20 May 2021 15:04:16 -0700 Matt Welland wrote:
> As mentioned in the coding jam I put together a chicken bundle including the
> iup egg ready to go outside the box. It turns out that my assertion that
> it worked was wrong. I tested by running csi and was able to load iup and
Hi,
On Mon, 24 May 2021 15:52:30 +0300 Aydar Zarifullin wrote:
> Hello all, I wrote a very basic binding to libexpect, I haven't tested
> it thoroughly but in simple cases, it works as it should I hope it
> will be useful to someone.
>
> Repository
> https://github.com/iZarif/ckn-expect
> Docume
On Mon, 24 May 2021 19:41:01 +0300 Aydar Zarifullin wrote:
> Thank you for your notes.
>
> - Would the body of `(unless interp ...)' in `tcl-create-interp` [0]
> ever be executed?
>
> - Tcl_CreateInterp may return a null pointer (#f) for example if it fails to
> allocate memory
>
> As for the
Hi,
The CHICKEN Team has decided to move the #chicken IRC channel to the
Libera.Chat network.
Our main IRC representative (vandusen) is already there and our
documentation has been updated.
In case you use IRC, see you there!
All the best.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario
Hi,
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:28:35 +0400 Aydar Zarifullin wrote:
> I moved the documentation to
> https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/tcl-expect and now I can't figure
> out how to properly remove the old page
Thanks. I've removed it. The web interface doesn't provide a way to
remove pages, as far
On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 00:03:27 +0200 Kristian Lein-Mathisen
wrote:
> I've written some bindings for Facebook's RocksDB which I wish to publish.
> Here's my release-info file:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kristianlm/chicken-rocksdb/master/rocksdb.release-info
Thanks, Kristian! Your egg ha
Hi Robert,
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:22:02 -0400 Robert Jensen
wrote:
> Announcing version 0.7.0 of the zlib egg.
>
> * Use deflateInit2 / inflateInit2 zlib APIs
> * [BREAKING] `port` is now a required argument
>
> Ref: https://github.com/r1b/zlib/releases/tag/0.7.0
Thanks for the update!
It wou
Hi Théo and all,
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 12:34:24 +0200 Théo Cavignac
wrote:
> After my previous mail concerning the static compilation in a Docker
> container I figured it would be nice to use the same idea to create a
> cross compilation environment for linux-to-windows dev.
>
>
> Using the cross
Hi,
On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 21:51:59 +0200 Vasilij Schneidermann
wrote:
>> 2. You're right! I actually hadn't thought about that! Guess I had a hard
>> time
>> not conflating "unique and non-repeatable" with random numbers... would a
>> timestamp be a better (but probably still not ideal) approach
Hi,
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 08:30:08 + Ka-tsùn Lo̍h wrote:
> This is a minor update to the WebSocket client extension that was
> submitted a week ago:
>
> - replaced some foreign invocations with scheme code where the
> functionality has already been implemented by another egg.
> - updated meta f
Hi,
On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 17:30:14 +0200 (CEST) ammkrn--- via
wrote:
> I'm reading the Chicken Scheme manual's section on using the
> interpreter. The first code example, under "Writing Sheme Scripts"
> doesn't seem to work with csi Version 5.2.0 (rev 317468e4)
> macosx-unix-clang-x86-64 [ 64bit
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 01:06:58 +0200 Vasilij Schneidermann
wrote:
> Someone on the IRC channel pointed out that there is no obvious egg to
> use for solving SICP exercises as the sicp egg is C4-only and no
> alternatives exist. I chose to port SRFI-203 and SRFI-216 which provide
> the picture lang
Hi Ariela,
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:44:11 -0300 Ariela Wenner wrote:
> Hi all, I seem to be running into a weird issue with this rc when trying to
> install the pigeon-hole egg (might happen with other eggs too, I tested a
> bunch
> and it only happened with pigeon-hole though).
>
> Link to log o
Hi Christian,
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:22:10 +0200 (CEST) Christian Himpe
wrote:
> all seems to work, yet installing "sendfile", "http-session", "srfi-18" gave:
>
> ```
> Warning: Deprecated identifier `current-milliseconds'
> ```
>
> Otherwise:
>
> Operating system: Ubuntu Mate 20.04
> Hardware
Hi Ivan and folks,
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:43:33 +0900 Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have made a stable release of Chicken 3.1.0. It is based on the
> 3.0.10 development snapshot, and it does _not_ include the changes to
> the srfi-69 unit. The changes to srfi-69 are now in the 3.1
Hi William,
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:00:48 -0400 William Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does Scheme (and especially Chicken Scheme) offer a way to do optional
> and keyed procedure parameters?
Yes, Chicken does. See
http://chicken.wiki.br/Extensions%20to%20the%20standard
Best wishes,
Mario
Hi Alaric,
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:45:24 +0100 Alaric Snell-Pym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest the egg name "date-info" to reflect its passive take-a-date-
> and-return-information-about-it nature, and ask that I be given a
> nice directory in the repository to put it in (I already have an
Hi folks,
The Chicken LiveCD 0.3 is out. You can get it from
http://g3pd.ufpel.edu.br/chicken/livecd
This version contains:
* Chicken 3.1.0
* more than 300 eggs installed
* Emacs + Quack + scheme-complete
* PDF manual
* a bunch of tools and libraries to develop using Chicken
Chicken LiveCD med
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:12:46 +0200 Ignaz Peter Hochgemuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I try to install bb.egg in a fresh chicken-3.1.0, but I get the
> following errors. I'm using gcc 4.1.2 on AMD64 (Debian etch)
> What's wrong? Any idea? Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
> karolinger:/home/hgm/buil
Hi Ivan and folks,
On Thu, 01 May 2008 08:45:01 +0900 Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Release 3.2.0 of Chicken is now available. It is based on
> development snapshot 3.1.10, except it does not include the
> precompiled header option. This release includes some minor bug
> fixes, and
Hi Ivan and folks,
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:22:30 +0900 Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Release 3.3.0 of Chicken is now available. This release includes a
> new unit ports, which contains all port-related procedures from units
> extras and utils. It also includes all the bug fixes made
Hi folks,
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:32:34 +0200 Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:39:21AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 02:41:27PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> > >> O
Hi Felix and folks,
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:14:05 +0200 "felix winkelmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That looks good. If we don't want to play with Windows registry and
> > Unix symlinks, couldn't chicken-setup, when installing a `foo' egg,
> > pick the highest version and generate a foo.scm
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:11:20 +0200 Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think this can be solved automatically (unless we want to
> recreate Autotools or CMake) so what is needed is a way to override or
> add to existing search paths by passing switches to chicken-setup,
> which it then
Hi folks,
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:46:33 +0200 "felix winkelmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An interesting question is where to get the meta-information. I
> think a good approach would be to have it locally, but not including
> the build-instructions. An "update" command (to chicken-setup or in
Hi Adam,
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:57:03 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam C. Emerson) wrote:
> I have just packaged up the Unicode normalization stuff from Scheme48
> into an egg and I would very much like to make it available.
> (Especially since I plan to make another egg that depends on it.)
>
> So
Hi folks,
According to
(use http-client)
(length
(with-input-from-string
(http:GET
"http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/3/repository";)
read))
we have 398 eggs available to be installed via chicken-setup (2 to
400).
Do we have any sponsor for the Great CHICKEN T-
Hi folks,
,[ http://chicken.wiki.br/portability ]
| With version 2.7, a new and simpler build-system has been
| introduced. This page lists all platforms in which the new version
| has been confirmed to build and run.
|
| ...
`
What should we do with this page?
a) keep it as it is.
b) r
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:19:38 +0200 "felix winkelmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Mario Domenech Goulart
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > ,[ http://chicken.wiki.br/portability ]
> > |
Hi folks.
Is it possible with chicken 4 to generate toplevel (or module-level)
definitions from a macro (explicit renaming)?
I mean, I'd like something like:
(module gen-things *
(define-syntax gen-thing
(lambda (thing)
`(define ,thing (lambda () (display "hello")
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:55:16 +0200 Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 09:47:18AM -0300, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> >
> > Is it possible with chicken 4 to generate toplevel (or module-level)
> > definitions from a macro (explicit rena
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:36:36 +0200 Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 07:05:35PM +0200, Tobia Conforto wrote:
> > I cannot get it to work:
> >
> > $ chicken-setup.hy utf8
> > Error: unbound variable: ##sys#register-macro-2
> >
> > That's the only line of output.
> > E
Hi folks
I'm gonna update some software on galinha (aka chicken.wiki.br) so
it's going to be down for some time (a few, I hope) from the next 30
minutes.
Best wishes.
Mario
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.o
On 05 Sep 2008 10:38:13 -0300 Mario Domenech Goulart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm gonna update some software on galinha (aka chicken.wiki.br) so
> it's going to be down for some time (a few, I hope) from the next 30
> mi
Hi Ivan and folks.
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:17:02 +0900 Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Release 3.4.0 of Chicken is now available. This release includes a
> new unit files, which contains all file-related procedures from units
> extras and utils. It also includes support for out-of-tree
Hi Wietse
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:04:13 +0200 "Wietse Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've put the following in a file and compiled it with chicken:
>
> (begin
> (display (command-line-arguments))
> (exit))
>
> when I run this with:
> test.exe "1 argument"
> I get:
> (1 argument)
>
> B
Hi Nathan
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:09:02 -0500 "Nathan Thern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chicken is now an official cygwin package!
Thank you! Much appreciated.
Best wishes.
Mario
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists
Hi folks,
The Chicken LiveCD 0.4 is out. You can get it from
http://g3pd.ufpel.edu.br/chicken/livecd
This version contains:
* Chicken 3.4.0
* more than 300 eggs installed
* Emacs + Quack + scheme-complete
* PDF manual
* a bunch of tools and libraries to develop using Chicken
A screenshot:
http
Hi Mark
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:43:03 -0600 "Mark Fredrickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do I need to updated repo perms? I tried to check into the readline
> directory and got denied (probably a good thing). My username is
> "mfredrickson"
I've added rw permissions to the readline repo for yo
Hi Alejo.
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:59:28 +0100 Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I was trying to post to Ticket #407 but I got an error saying that my
> submission had been rejected as potential spam (and, interestingly, it
> had an “Internal Error” message, which makes me wonde
Hi Alejo.
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:12:26 +0100 Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I decided to write a simple bc replacement using Chicken. I had the
> following goals:
>
> 1. Have a syntax for expressions that requires very little typing. In
> other words, make it fast to eval
Hi Jörg.
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:54:42 +0100 Jörg "F. Wittenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> my standard debian build method fails like this:
>
> /home/jfw/build/Scheme/chicken/debian/tmp/usr/bin/chicken-install
> -update-db
> generating database
>
> cp -r /tmp/setup-15c.tmp/modules.db /var
Hi Alaric
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:36:37 + Alaric Snell-Pym
wrote:
> Ivan kindly committed some code for me, thus creating the aes egg,
> which implements the aes cryptosystem. It uses a public-domain C
> implementation which is inlined into the egg, so there's no
> dependencies.
>
> However,
Hi William
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:36:29 -0500 William Ramsay wrote:
> I guess what I have to do now is answer questions that I know the
> answer to. And, believe it or not, that answer list is growing.
Nice to know you are getting useful feedback to answer your questions.
Whenever you think it
Hi Drew
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:27:24 -0800 Drew Hess wrote:
> Changing the definition of the nested
> accum procedure from this:
>
> (define (rfc822-header->list iport #!key strict? (reader (cut read-line <>)))
> (define (accum name bodies r)
> (cons (list name (string-concatenate-reverse
Hi Felix
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:31:24 +0100 felix winkelmann wrote:
> The current release candidate can be found at:
>
> http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/chicken-4.0.0.tar.gz
>
> I tested it on several systems (mingw(+msys), linux), but would
> appreciate if others could give it a t
Hi Changying
On Thu, 14 May 2009 11:08:25 +0800 Changying Li wrote:
> whenever I look for a function, I must read several parts of manual. I
> think a function index is a good thing.
>
> Or it is in some places that I don't know ?
Maybe you can use `apropos'.
If you are using chicken 3, `aprop
Hi Matt
On Thu, 28 May 2009 07:32:04 -0600 Matt Gushee wrote:
> I thought I would create a simple logging facility, and, well of
> course every good log entry needs a timestamp ... so I searched for a
> function to get the current date and/or time, and it doesn't seem to
> exist. Can that be tru
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:30:36 +0900 Ivan Raikov wrote:
> The Chicken development snapshot script has been adapted to Chicken
> 4. From now on, Chicken 4 snapshots will be built and linked to on the
> development snapshots page:
>
>http://chicken.wiki.br/dev-snapshots/
Fantastic, Ivan. Th
Hi Ivan
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:33:23 +0900 Ivan Raikov wrote:
> I don't know enough about how the RSS feeds are constructed to
> answer this question. I will have to discuss with Mario and see what
> we can do. I can only say that there will have to be a separate run of
> Salmonella for Chicke
Hi Nicholas
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:24:15 -0700 "Nicholas \"Indy\" Ray"
wrote:
> So, from my experience the chicken wiki has always had poor search
> capability, but especially since the large wiki restructuring effort,
> the wiki has become almost unsearchable, with a large portion of pages
> t
Hi Felix
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:59:48 +0200 felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Mario Domenech
> Goulart wrote:
>> Hi Felix
>>
>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:44:27 +0200 felix winkelmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>> CHICKEN 4.1.0 has been rel
Hi Dave
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:02:41 -0400 (EDT) David N Murray
wrote:
> I'm a noob to Scheme & Chicken, so forgive me if this is really trivial,
> but I'm struggling mightily.
>
> # csi
> CHICKEN
> (c)2008-2009 The Chicken Team
> (c)2000-2007 Felix L. Winkelmann
> Version 4.1.0 - SVN rev. 1529
Hi Kon
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:51:35 -0700 Kon Lovett wrote:
> 2) Unit utils 'qs', 'system*', 'compile-file-options', & 'compile-
> file' -> Unit files.
I suggest renaming `qs' to something more meaningful.
Best wishes.
Mario
___
Chicken-users mailin
Hi Sven
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:56:21 +0100 (CET) Sven Hartrumpf
wrote:
> I could not find the git project name ...
> Could somebody provide a complete
> "git clone ..."
> command on the following page:
>
> http://chicken.wiki.br/Development
I've just written there some instructions about how t
Hi Jeronimo
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 00:15:56 -0200 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> I have found a bug in the crunch egg[0], but I'm not sure how to
> report it. Should I use chicken-bug or do I contect the egg
> developer directly? (I mean, is chicken-bug only for the core
> of Chicken or for eggs also?
Hi Nicolas
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:28:28 +0900 Nicolas Pelletier
wrote:
> I successfully installed Chicken 4.2.0 on my machine (Debian 5.0, 64
> bits Intel). However, I cannot install any eggs; the problem seems to
> be that I am sitting behind a proxy:
>
>> nico...@dynamo:~/dev$ chicken-install
Hi
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:12:38 -0800 "Nicholas \"Indy\" Ray"
wrote:
> I was under the impression that the QT egg was more a demo, then an
> egg ment to be practical, and hence was *finished*.
I'm not a Qt expert, but my impression is that when the documentation
for the Qt egg says it's suppose
Hi
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:01:59 +0100 Christian Kellermann
wrote:
> * Michael Maul [091113 22:38]:
>> Could someone describe how to access POS and GET parameters from inside
>> spiffy?
>
> (uri-query (request-uri (current-request will get you the GET
> parameters as alist. I am not sure a
Hi Derrel
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:37:16 -0500 Derrell Piper wrote:
> I'm working on a new egg but I don't quite understand the
> documentation process. Assuming I want to go with (doc-from-wiki),
> where do I go in the wiki to actually create the page? And should I
> do that before or after I g
Hi Derrell
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:36:26 -0500 Derrell Piper wrote:
>> It's under $PREFIX/share/chicken/doc/html, where PREFIX is the path you
>> provided to `make' when building chicken.
>
> Okay, all I see in there is the base Chicken documentation. No eggs.
That's embarrassing. Now I'm real
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:58:50 -0600 Jim Ursetto wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Derrell Piper wrote:
>> I click, 'edit' and change "[[stream-ext]]" to, say, "[[mailbox]]", and
>> then click, 'preview' and the two links in the preview show up as:
>>
>> https://galinha.ucpel.tche.br/cgi
Hi Felix
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:07:00 +0100 felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
>>
>> It's all a big mess.
>
> A somewhat more constructive response: there should be a single documentation
> format. I personally would prefer wiki pages, but eggdoc
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:58:09 -0500 Derrell Piper wrote:
> Derrell Piper writes:
>
>> If I click the "History" link on the wiki home page right now I see this:
>>
>> 16382 mario, Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:16:57 -0200: Info about the bugtracking...
>> 16296 felix, Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:33:38 -0200: added
Hi Derrell
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:45:17 -0500 Derrell Piper wrote:
> How does one become a registered wiki user?
You need an svn account for that.
> What exactly does subscribing to a page do and moreover, how do I manage
> pages that I've subscribed to?
You'll get e-mail notifications when
Hi Derrell
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:52:26 -0500 Derrell Piper wrote:
>> A brief description of the purpose of your extension
>
> This egg provides an interface to the Yelp developer API
> (http://www.yelp.com/developers/documentation). Yelp is a social
> database of customer reviews of restaurant
Hi Felix
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:40:11 +0100 felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Mario Domenech Goulart
> wrote:
>>
>> How about making henrietta fetch the documentation when serving eggs?
>> It's not the optimal solution but it looks simple
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:12:07 +0100 felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Mario Domenech Goulart
> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I'm missing something. Given that chicken-install already fetches
>> egg files via HTTP, would fetching a page from
>>
Hi Alaric
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:17:50 + Alaric Snell-Pym
wrote:
> I'm porting my old chicken3 aes egg to chicken4. Well, rather, I'm
> applying c-keen's patches to do same, and fixing a few things here and
> there. Please can I have a 4/aes egg dir in svn? There doesn't seem to
> be one ye
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:59:21 +0100 Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:13:05PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
>> Peter Bex scripsit:
>>
>> > My goal here is to load a file regardless of whether it was loaded by
>> > some bootstrap code or installed as an extension.
>> >
>> > Is there a way t
Hi Peter.
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:34:41 -0600 Peter Danenberg wrote:
> Ported from scratch + test suite
Thank you. I've added the srfi-63 dir to the release/4 repo.
Best wishes.
Mario
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://li
Hi
For those who are using the http-session egg for chicken 4: http-session
release 2.0 is not compatible with previous versions. The API has
changed.
The main changes are:
* `make-session-table' is now exported (it was `make-table' internally).
* `current-url' and `current-ip' are gone
* `se
--- Begin Message ---
It is now possible to join the Scheme Reports WG1 and
WG2 mailing lists either through the Google Groups websites
(http://groups.google.com/group/scheme-reports-wg[12]) or in the usual
way via email to scheme-reports-wg[12]-subscr...@googlegroups.com.
Only members of the WG ma
Hi Ivan (Cc Felix)
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:57:23 +0900 Ivan Raikov wrote:
>The next release of Chicken, 4.4.0, is currently in the process of
> testing and preparation. It will be based on development snapshot 4.3.7,
> available for download here:
>
> http://chicken.wiki.br/dev-snapshots/2010
Hi
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:30:51 +0900 Ivan Raikov wrote:
> Chicken 4.4.0 has been released and is available for download here:
>
> http://chicken.wiki.br/releases/4.4.0/chicken-4.4.0.tar.gz
>
> A full list of changes can be seen here:
> http://chicken.wiki.br/releases/4.4.0/NEWS
>
> Please ha
Hi Mark,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:58:02 + (GMT) Mark Carter
wrote:
> Felix asked me to try compiling the latest version of chicken from
> git. I am happy to announce that it all goes very well - expect for
> the command chicken-install - which seems to be a Win7/Vista
> problem. Here's a more
Hi Mark
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:59:18 + (GMT) Mark Carter
wrote:
> In my recent report, I mentioned about not being able to bootstrap. I
> didn't read the README :( I'm supposed to obtain a bootstrapper from
> http://chicken.wiki.br/chicken-projects/bootstrap/
>
> Unfortunately, there isn't
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:51:27 +0100 Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 08:14:01PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
>> If there are no objections I will replace the old egg with this code
>> once we have verified that it's stable.
>
> I've fixed a few more bugs and switched the tests to use the "tes
Hi Jörg
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:14:59 +0100 Jörg "F. Wittenberger"
wrote:
> I just made a cut&paste mistake. Now I feel chicken could do better
> than segfault at this:
>
> (define-syntax pass-a-ref
> (define-syntax with-a-ref
> (syntax-rules ()
> ((_ ref b) b)))
> (syntax-rules (
Hi
I just scanned the egg index page
(http://chicken.wiki.br/chicken-projects/egg-index-4.html) and found the
links below pointing to empty wiki pages.
Som empty pages are for eggs ported from chicken 3 to chicken 4 which
didn't have the documentation ported. Some are for SRFIs and some don't
ha
thor
http://chicken.wiki.br/users/mario-domenech-goulart";>Mario
Domenech Goulart
=== Description
Procedures to ease the generation of some frequently used [X]HTML
structures
=== API
(tabularize data #!key table-id table-class quote-procedure
even-row-class odd-row-class)
(itemize items #!key
Hi Felix
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:58:18 +0100 felix
wrote:
> Mario Domenech Goulart schrieb:
>>
>> I've made a very ugly and lame program to generate initial wiki
>> documentation for eggs based on the .meta file and on the module file.
>> It's at
Hi Jeronimo
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:20:43 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> I have checked the egg source and indeed, the redefinitions are
> there (this is from utf8.scm):
>
> (import (rename (except scheme
> string string->list list->string string-fill!
>
Hi Jeronimo
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:56:18 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> I'm a bit confused... From the documentation it seemed that the older
> procedures were jsut renamed for convenience.
I suppose you are looking at the documentation for chicken 3, right? If
so, it was back when there w
Hi Jeronimo
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:46:34 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> When trying to install a specific version of any egg, chicken-install
> seems to get confused:
>
> # chicken-install -v
> 4.4.3
> # chicken-install srfi-42:1.7
>
> Error: (string=?) bad argument type: ("srfi-42" . "1.7")
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:24:56 +0200 (CEST) Felix
wrote:
> With the most recent commits (4.4.4), chicken is now consistent in the
> way core forms are handled. There are no hard-coded special forms and
> everything can be redefined, reexported and modified on import. Syntax
> may now also expand i
Hi Jeronimo
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:06:29 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> I am trying to get this example from the lazy-ffi documentation
> working, but I don't know what I'm doing wrong...
>
> This is the code:
>
> thing.scm
> /---
> (use lazy-ffi)
> (use numbers)
>
> #~"libc.so.6"
> (#~prin
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:06:29 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> $ csc -X lazy-ffi.scm thing.scm
>
> (Do I really need to include the lazy-ffi source when compiling?)
According to the wiki docs, yes:
To use this extension in compiled code, invoke the compiler with
-extension lazy-ffi. Th
Hi Jeronimo
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:17:25 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:51:42PM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:06:29 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini
>> wrote:
>>
>> > $ csc -X lazy-ffi.scm thing.scm
Hi Jeronimo
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 23:18:57 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> I've been working on some unsafe fast I/O procedures for my own use,
> and I thought I'd make them an extension, if more people would
> like to use them.
> These are for reading and writing values from/to large files.
>
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:11:25 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
>> I'd suggest naming the egg in a way it doesn't sound as general as
>> "faster I/O primitives". Maybe it's just me, but when I read "fast-io",
>> I instinctively think that Chicken's I/O primitives are slow and by
>> using fast-io I'
Hi Thilo
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:12:54 +0200 "Thilo Fischer" wrote:
> Looking for a way to merge static libraries whithin a CMake build I
> found an old thread in a mailing group referencing chicken's CMake
> build scripts. Though rather old I would really like to have a look at
> these. AFAIK ch
On Wed, 5 May 2010 05:02:29 -0500 Jim Ursetto wrote:
> I have placed an experimental chicken-doc server, chickadee, at
>
> http://3e8.org/chickadee/
>
> It should be reasonably stable.
And fantastic, I should add.
Best wishes.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario
Hi Sven!
On Wed, 12 May 2010 21:03:31 +0200 (CEST) Sven Hartrumpf
wrote:
> Where is a good place to post Scheme Job Offers?
> (Job is located in Germany, sorry :-) )
> I am asking because the job offers on schemers.org
> (that's where I wanted to post first)
> look somewhat dated.
>
> Any recom
501 - 600 of 942 matches
Mail list logo
