On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote:
My question
bears on a different level: is the UI layout (not code) somewhat restricted
in any way? I'm no lawyer, nor do I know much about interface licensing.
IANAL, but if you're not copying any images, and are
just
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.org wrote:
2) Most of the supposed performance advantage of strict aliasing rules is
probably taken care of by memory disambiguation in modern (ie., Core2 and
later) CPUs.
I kind of doubt that. Disallowing aliasing lets the
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
With that in mind I think we should explicitly use
-fno-strict-aliasing until someone is willing to take the time to run
buildbots, track down regressions, etc.
+1 for -fno-strict-aliasing until someone fixes most/all of
the
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:13 PM, n179911 n179...@gmail.com wrote:
For this test case defined in unload_test.cc:
TEST_F(UnloadTest, CrossSiteInfiniteBeforeUnloadSync) {...}
i have tried:
./out/Debug/automated_ui_tests --gtest_filter='CrossSiteInfiniteUnloadSync'
./out/Debug/base_unittests
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:23 PM, n179911 n179...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. but It still said '0 tests ran'
$ out/Debug/tab_switching_test
--gtest_filter=UnloadTest.CrossSiteInfiniteBeforeUnloadSync
Note: Google Test filter = UnloadTest.CrossSiteInfiniteBeforeUnloadSync
[==] Running 0
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 3:14 PM, n179911 n179...@gmail.com wrote:
And I have put 'shared' library in my include gypi file
$ more ~/.gyp/include.gpyi
{'variables': {
'library': 'shared_library',
}}
How can I make sure that it is building in shared library and using
the gold linker?
I
I have had problems trying to install both 2005 and 2008, not sure why,
probably dueling service packs?
On Dec 17, 2009 9:14 AM, Dominic Mazzoni dmazz...@google.com wrote:
Is there a WebKit trybot? I'm working on a small WebKit patch
(https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32571), but my test
Hey folks,
I seem to recall we have a dashboard somewhere showing
the cycle time of each of our build/test bots, but I can't
find it. Can somebody point me to it?
If it doesn't exist, maybe I'll scrape one together.
Thanks...
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
Do you have flex installed?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Richard Zhao linux...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using chromeos build script build_chrome.sh. Error log:
RULE webcore_bindings_sources_binding_39 out/Release/obj/gen/webcore/
bindings/
V8DocumentType.cpp
Traceback (most recent call
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:29 AM, oshima osh...@chromium.org wrote:
I filed bugs and made CL below. Dan, may I send this to you?
http://codereview.chromium.org/466047
Sure, I'd be happy to review.
Please replace abc with the real bug number ... oddly,
there wasn't one, so I just filed 29598 for
It's d...@chromium.org.
On Dec 7, 2009 11:21 AM, oshima osh...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote: On
Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:29 ...
Thanks. Is it dke...@google.com, right?
Please replace abc with the real bug number ... oddly
Sounds like you're trying to commit to the read-only repo?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Zelidrag Hornung zelid...@chromium.org wrote:
When I try to commit my change, I am getting following error there - any
ideas what might be causing this?
gcl commit my_change
Presubmit checks took 1.7s to
from your working copy:
#data/really_large_component: None,
},
safesync_url: http://chromium-status.appspot.com/lkgr;
},
]
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Sounds like you're trying to commit to the read-only repo?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:30 PM, oshima osh...@chromium.org wrote:
Looks like there are more tests that failing in valgrind test.
...
This is not good. Is there any issue if we make a valgrind test fail when
the test itself fails?
If not, I'd suggest that we exclude them in ui_tetsts.gtext.txt
Might not hurt to build from the latest sources and make sure they haven't fixed
it already, too.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen...@gmail.com wrote:
You could file a bug with the gdb people ... keeping a copy of the
problematic binary/associated libraries may help
2009/11/26 Maciej Bliziński blizin...@google.com:
How is src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/WebCore.gypi
supposed to arrive there, is it generated?
No, it's in svn.
d...@dank-pc
/cygdrive/c/users/dank/Documents/chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore
$ svn info
Path: .
URL:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
My Release Linux build stripped is 39.5mb. (The size bots show ~44mb,
which I think is a Chrome vs Chromium thing. It is curious how the
Windows binary is nearly half the size of the Linux or Mac one.)
...
And like I had
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
Does this warning help anyone, anywhere, for any reason?
.h files that are missing newlines cause nasty and confusing
errors on some platforms, IIRC.
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
Yeah, and are our preprocessors actually going to do what's described in
that post? I'm sure MSVC won't. I doubt gcc on Mac/Linux will.
This was a real issue for me with gcc a few years ago (at Google, IIRC).
- Dan
--
I think not.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:04 PM, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using Visual Studio 2005 (Express) and I downloaded the Windows SDK 7
websetup - it mentions there Visual C++ Compilers and in the description,
it says Installs the Visual C++ 9.0 Compilers. Do I need it?
I like the idea.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Chris Bentzel cbent...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using them as a learning exercise for the network stack - and I'm
guessing that they will help debug behavior in the future as well.
I don't intend to add additional functionality over the standard
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
Should I spend time trying to flesh these
out and add to net/tools, or is this something which doesn't belong in
the chromium codebase?
I'm weakly against the idea, since adding dependencies increases the burden
when
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=15876
is a report of a memory leak that happens if you're timed
out while logged in to citicards.com and the tab is not in front.
Can someone with an account there try to reproduce?
Thanks...
--
Chromium Developers mailing list:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Dominic Jodoin dominic.jod...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wanted to share with you all that I've succeeded in compiling
Chrome using Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition and ATL 7.1 bundled with
the Windows Driver Kit (WDK).
I've wrote a blog post that gives the details
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
To be clear, the Chromium codebase doesn't use community-contributed
translations. However, our help center exists in many languages, including
German ( http://www.google.com/support/chrome/?hl=de ), and
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 6:27 PM, James Su su...@chromium.org wrote:
I tried to run gclient runhooks --force in a new copy of chromium code,
but got following error:
If nobody gives better advice, I'd suggest just moving the old
tree aside and getting a new one overnight :-(
That's what I had
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:01 AM, 黒鉄章 ak...@yayakoshi.net wrote:
This gold sounds good, although if I want to install it on Fedora I note
that there isn't package (yet) and the src/build/install-build-deps.sh
script is apparently only for Ubuntu 8/9
Patches to fix this would be welcome.
so I
I get
NameError: name '_toolset' is not defined while loading dependencies
of base/base.gyp while loading dependencies of app/app.gyp while
loading dependencies of build/all.gyp while trying to load
build/all.gyp
when building or even just running 'gclient runhooks --force'.
Also, when I do
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
NameError: name '_toolset' is not defined while loading dependencies
when building or even just running 'gclient runhooks --force'.
Also, when I do 'gclient
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
3) Startup time is faster than calculator.
I'm not sure if you're kidding. Do you mean Windows calculator?
On my home linux box (Jaunty, reasonably fast),
warm startup time of chrome is less
than the warm startup time of
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:00 PM, mht mhsien.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Some information about Visual Studio 2010. But question first: Is
there any plan (long term / short term) to support it?
It would probably be a good idea, eventually.
If anyone wants to write an msbuild backend for gyp, have at
What linker are you using? Have you tried installing and using gold?
Which targets fail? Can you at least build base and base_unittests?
Also, next time you save a log, be sure to save *both* stdout
and stderr, e.g.
make foo log 21
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:59 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
The point I was trying to make is that the 'limit' factor as you put it is
proportional to memory usage. Given our large memory consumption in the
browser process, the numbers from the paper imply dozens of corruptions
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
I checked in a commit this morning (27949) which caused linking errors for
Linux. I got undefined reference to
BlockedPopupContainer::kImpossibleNumberOfPopups in a function which had
already been using that constant
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
undefined reference to
BlockedPopupContainer::kImpossibleNumberOfPopups
Aha. It's a bug in our code. chrome/browser/blocked_popup_container.cc
needs to follow through and actually declare storage for that variable
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Jacob Mandelson ja...@mandelson.org wrote:
There are multiple, concurrent writers to the socket. If you make
assumptions about the kernel's behaviour, you might be able to come up
with a workable framing protocol, but it's much better to use the
correct
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Jacob Mandelson ja...@mandelson.org wrote:
Which reads like all or nothing to me, though I could imagine a (perverse?)
implementation with each writer having a send buffer lower layer pulling
data from multiple writers' send buffers in an interleaved manner.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Steve Vandebogart vand...@chromium.org wrote:
(I think PIPE_BUF is 64K on modern Linux, but might be smaller elsewhere.)
I seem to recall that pipe buf is a page and /usr/include/linux/limits.h
says
#define PIPE_BUF 4096
Yeah, I got PIPE_BUF and pipe
It's not supposed to be that way... maybe we need to check in a new cygwin.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:03 PM, vha14 vuh...@gmail.com wrote:
So it looks like I need to install Cygwin separately before I can
build Chrome? If so this should be added to the Windows build
instruction page.
On Oct
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
I would trade away 3% perf on a benchmark for 500 MB less RAM usage without
hesitation or any additional testing.
+1
thestig is setting up a linux perf bot right now
that will be configured with a tiny amount of
system
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org wrote:
Something disable a trick we use to download a zip file containing svn
and uncompressing it. You can do it manually since it's one time
process.
See for the details:
Does our default build really depend on -msse2 anymore? Doesn't
seem to on linux...
2009/9/22 Ujjwol (उज्जवल लामिछाने) ujjwollamichh...@gmail.com:
This (http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxPackaging) page says
that
For silly reasons our default build depends on SSE, but we don't
',
'-msse2',
'-mfpmath=sse',
],
}],
],
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=8475
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Does our default build really depend on -msse2 anymore
It's so our tests pass, I think.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
Is there a reason we gate this on branding? The comment doesn't speak
to that at all.
Evan Martin wrote:
The code doesn't lie:
'conditions': [
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:07 AM, James Su su...@chromium.org wrote:
I'd like to compile chromium with some special CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS, how can I
do? I'm using make build on 64bit Linux.
Yes, e.g. create ~/.gyp/include.gypi
{
'variables': {
'release_extra_cflags': '-g',
After hitting this message about twenty times over the last couple days,
and getting pinged by various people about it,
I went looking for a corresponding bug report.
The closest match seems to be
http://crbug.com/22623
so I updated that and marked it high priority.
Chrome installs in finite time, whereas (judging by how long my
Vista box has been saying installing IE8) IE8 seems
to require infinite time to install.
I don't know how many people actually sit there and
wait for software updates to finish, but lordy,
watching ie8 update is like watching paint
doesn't. They know they'll get it on your box under all
circumstances. So they just don't care. Sad.
Think about the man-years (or man-lives) lost waiting for IE8 installs
around the world!
Mike
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Chrome installs in finite time
OK, I asked on that thread.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.org wrote:
Can we ask him to submit strace of chrome when it happens?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 08:40, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
The cause of the problem is Google Chrome for Linux:
An external contributor was recently surprised that a change tested
on linux was reverted because it broke the build on windows.
(His mental model was that linux developers don't have to
worry about other platforms, that's what windows developers are for.)
He said that none of the doc at
:03, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
An external contributor was recently surprised that a change tested
on linux was reverted because it broke the build on windows.
(His mental model was that linux developers don't have to
worry about other platforms, that's what windows developers
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:45 AM, 子朝 王wzcpri...@gmail.com wrote:
How to extract .sln and .vcproj files from chrome.gyp?
I have added depot_tools, python bin, svn to my PATH,
but when I create a bat file:
gclient runhooks --force
pause
and run it, I always got nothing
You could try
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Darin Fisherda...@chromium.org wrote:
I've heard people proclaim the principle of being able to copy a profile
across systems as being a deciding factor for certain changes (e.g. the
history epoch change). However, it doesn't seem to be universally held or
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
I really like the idea of being able to move people between
operating systems and just bringing the profile along
without having to export and import...
(seems to me there are online services that offer that
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Antoine Labourpi...@google.com wrote:
- Gyp uses pkg-config to find includes/lib dependencies, i.e. it's
going to look at the host for them. If your target distribution
matches your host maybe you're fine, but it may not work at all, so
it'd would be good to
Has anyone else experienced chrome crashes on linux today?
I'm on the dev channel (3.0.198.1) and both at home and at
work it crashed on me when I tried to log in to gmail
the first time. Hasn't crashed thereafter.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers
I think we haven't quite drunk the boost koolaid. We turn off rtti and
exceptions, too.
On Aug 16, 2009 12:42 AM, n179911 n179...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does Chromium use boost library? In the source tree, i see there is a
'boost' directory under 'third-party'.
It appears to be an incomplete
Maybe that should automatically close the tree...
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Lei Zhangthes...@chromium.org wrote:
Do we have a warning for when the difference between the ToT revision
number and LKGR pass a certain threshold?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Marc-Antoine
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Mike Belshembel...@google.com wrote:
Unlike Obama's plan for healthcare, this CL is about giving you more
choice.
Political comments are off-topic for this list, I think.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
Hi plesner,
have you seen
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Webkit%20(dbg)(1)
in the last hour or so?
It looks like LayoutTests/http/tests/security/cross-frame-access-protocol.html
is reliably crashing since the v8 update to trunk/1.3.3 in
And are you looking to hire somebody to do the work? (That's what I
seem to gather from your hourly comment.)
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
Even with the translation, it's difficult to understand what you're saying
and asking. Chromium has a full
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Peter Kastingpkast...@google.com wrote:
* Yes, even purify, valgrind, and reliability bot redness. If you can't
figure out what to do with these, try pinging erikkay for purify issues and
huanr for reliability issues. (Not sure who a good general valgrind
Ever since updating to 3.0.196.0, I've seen a
blank window pop up and go away periodically
(once an hour or so?). Anyone else seen that?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or
Evan wrote about this earlier:
A few people have found their trunk builds crashing on startup.
This comes from a bug in theme loading and can bite you if you
installed some of the in-development themes.
The fix is to rm -rf your Extensions directory out of your profile directory.
The next release
Hi Erik,
PluginTest.Refresh is hanging purify every time, ever since
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Webkit%20(purify)/builds/9777
two days ago.
Want me to file a bug / disable it?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Peter Kastingpkast...@google.com wrote:
i.e. Next time we hold a valgrind fixit,
how about we just delete the non-upstream-bugs
suppressions files?
I think this would be a mistake.
There is a lot of accumulated knowledge in the valgrind suppresions file.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Peter Kastingpkast...@google.com wrote:
I told Ben this morning that I'm taking ownership of the flakiness problem,
and I meant it. I will do my best to harass people. Next on my list is
going to every single subteam meeting and making noise at all of them.
Please check to make sure the python scripts have UNIX
line endings, not DOS ones.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:43 PM, n179911n179...@gmail.com wrote:
When I load a page on chromium that I run on debugger,I get 'Aw, Snap!
What page?
My question is how can i debug problem like this? Is there a stack
trace or core dump for situation like this?
If you installed the dev channel
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Adam Langleya...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Peter Kastingpkast...@google.com wrote:
That is probably coming from the allocator underneath Chrome (presumably the
one provided by the OS kernel). It probably means you have memory
Sounds good to me. It's nice living in the future and being able to
rely on things like signalfd!
- Dan
p.s. I wrote a man page of sorts for that wy back in the past,
before it existed:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0106.3/0404.html
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Adam
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Tim Steelet...@chromium.org wrote:
you have to keep asking, unless you're always on IRC and can cleverly search
the window contents. A constant place to go looking for this would make it
easier, at least in my opinion. Like right now I don't know what's up
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Peter Kastingpkast...@google.com wrote:
Like right now I don't know what's up with Chromium Mac
(valgrind) or Webkit dbg (12) to name a few; they're red but the tree is
open.
If you ever see a case like this, go ahead and close the tree yourself until
you get
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Dirk Prankedpra...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Darin Fisherda...@chromium.org wrote:
I think we need to make it possible for the buildbots to run in a mode where
there are absolutely no generated files output into the source directory.
Twice now (three days ago and today) I got the error
Assertion failed: (slab-magic == SLAB_MAGIC), function slab_alloc,
file x-alloc.c, line 353.
while running the ui tests under valgrind on the mac...
and I can't figure out where it's coming from.
I've grepped through the chromium and valgrind
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Chromium%20Linux%20(valgrind)/builds/1671/steps/valgrind%20test:%20unit/logs/stdio
introduces 26 new unintialized memory references and two leaks.
That's a big enough batch that it might be a good idea
to revert it and commit something later
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Mohamed Mansourm0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to learn about valgrind through
the documentation,
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/using-valgrind,
and it seems its Linux related, so I booted in Linux and installed all the
valgrind tools.
Yeah. How about a presubmit check? (only half joking)
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, PhistucKphist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am either wrong or just out of context here, but O3D has added another
mentioning of ATL in their code -
That's the third such cl I've seen. Conclusion: tiny fixes like that should
be committed as tbr to avoid duplication of effort.
On Jul 30, 2009 12:44 PM, Wan-Teh Chang w...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:13 PM, LivioSoareslivi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,I'm running...
Thanks a
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Mark Mentovaim...@chromium.org wrote:
I think i'll work on
studying the current build system to figure out how to implement a
CMake one.
That's fine. Let us (including me) know what you come up with.
In particular, a CMake backend for gyp might be cool.
-
reported problem,
pain on for example xcode or kdevelop users.
What is the problem, again?
Does the OP want xcode or kdevelop to run gyp when the user starts a build?
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Steven Knights...@google.com wrote:
What's the coolness here?
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Dan
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Mark Mentovaim...@chromium.org wrote:
An objdir-ish solution would make sense, except the native build
systems we use don't really work in terms of objdirs, so we'd just
wind up generating a parallel directory structure with nothing but
xcode projects,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Darin Fisherda...@chromium.org wrote:
An objdir-ish solution would make sense, except the native build
systems we use don't really work in terms of objdirs, so we'd just
wind up generating a parallel directory structure with nothing but
xcode projects,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Thomas Van Lententhoma...@chromium.org wrote:
Here's my christmas wish: I'd like gyp and chrome to
support cross-compilation, so that I could (on my Linux box) kick
off distcc-accelerated builds for all three platforms, each one
going into a separate objdir.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Thomas Van Lententhoma...@chromium.org wrote:
The other thing to remember is the buildbot scripts and a bunch of build
scripts on all platforms are full of assumptions about the relationships
between projects and the tree. :(
Well, yes. I didn't say it would
If you don't run tools/valgrind/chrome_tests.sh, you can ignore this message.
tools/valgrind/chrome_tests.sh now uses the --show-possible option to
valgrind. This option isn't in standard valgrind, so bad things will
happen if you haven't run tools/valgrind/build-valgrind-for-chrome.sh
to
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Dan Kegeld...@kegel.com wrote:
If you don't run tools/valgrind/chrome_tests.sh, you can ignore this message.
tools/valgrind/chrome_tests.sh now uses the --show-possible option to
valgrind. This option isn't in standard valgrind, so bad things will
happen if
If you don't run valgrind, you can probably ignore this.
tools/valgrind/build-valgrind-for-chromium.sh has been updated.
Used to be, if you had gold as your system linker, it would
generate a valgrind that couldn't even valgrind /bin/true.
It's now a bit smarter, and won't build or install a
.
-- Evan Stade
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Paweł Hajdan
Jr.phajdan...@chromium.org wrote:
Seems like a good news, but why should I use this script instead of
regular valgrind? I don't know the difference.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 20:39, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
If you don't run
That's consistent with trybots doing debug builds.
Uninitialized var warnings only show up in optimized builds,
nothing we can do there but turn on optimizations.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Andrew Scherkusscher...@chromium.org wrote:
On a related note, Frank (cc'd) ran into an issue where
Stop me if you've heard this one before.
Today, a new directory was added to the source tree, and shortly
thereafter was reverted.
Should have been no problem, but... because the new directory
contained a gyp file, a file was generated in that directory,
and svn couldn't delete the directory
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Mark Larson (Google)m...@chromium.org wrote:
Should have been no problem, but... because the new directory
contained a gyp file, a file was generated in that directory,
and svn couldn't delete the directory when the revert landed.
This caused a build breakage,
OK, how about a backtrace?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Thiago Farinathiago.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I'm compiling the code under debug build option.
Everytime I try to type in omnibox this happens.
On Jul 20, 4:02 pm, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
Looks to me like the code
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:04 AM, John Abd-El-Malekj...@chromium.org wrote:
I have a leak after a check-in. I tried following the instructions on my
Linux box, but couldn't (I hardly develop on Linux).
jabdelma...@jabdelmalek:/usr/local/google/chrome/src$ sh
tools/valgrind/chrome_tests.sh
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:15 AM, empriserxueyunl...@gmail.com wrote:
/home/chrome/src/skia/ext/bitmap_platform_device_linux.cc: In static
member function 'static skia::BitmapPlatformDevice*
skia::BitmapPlatformDevice::Create(int, int, bool, uint8_t*)':
Dear Chromium developers,
more and more people are trying Chrome on Mac and Linux...
so it behooves us to really focus on stability.
We put a bunch of work into getting the Valgrind
buildbots green and on the main waterfall lately, so new bugs will
be caught quickly... but that involved
TThomas Van Lententhoma...@chromium.org wrote:
We're already running at -O1 on Linux, so there isn't much improvement
left to be had, I suspect. =A0 It might be worth it, dunno.
There is a lot of code cut out by being NDEBUG instead of DEBUG, that's
where I think the mac is getting its speed
Right, we use -O1 instead of -O2 or -O0 with valgrind; it strikes a good
balance between good stack and speed.
On Jul 17, 2009 9:46 AM, Erik Kay erik...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org
wrote: On Fri, Jul ...
One other tradeoff to
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Linus Upsonli...@google.com wrote:
If I recall correctly, the best way we found to measure the total memory
usage of a multi-process system like chrome was to measure the total commit
charge of windows as you run the test.
My favorite test is to plot the
Is eComstation the OS/2 that dare not speak its name? :-)
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Itaiida...@chromium.org wrote:
Feel free to make an eComstation port though, 2.0 is about to be
released, plus its not that different from any other OS ;)
- Itai
On Jun 23, 12:48 pm, Elliot
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
