How did you get the code? Tarball? Svn? Gclient?
Nicolas
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:38 AM, zyn wrote:
>
> Can't build the latest chrome,what's wrong with it.I use vs2005 to
> open the chrome.sln,it complains a lot of vcproj file missing.When
> build the solution,it failed.I was successfully bui
Need to run GPY as Bradley mentioned before? I did not try the latest build.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Bradley Nelson
wrote:
> Hi All,
> I've just rolled out a switchover of several components on Windows to
> gyp (generate your project),
> the new cross platform build tool to which chromium
Just a wild guess... please ignore if this is not applicable:
Any chance you pulled on Friday eve between 5pm and 8pm pacific time? If
so, you might have gotten your tree a little wedged. When you do a gclient
sync, does it "skip" any of the files because there is a gyp generated file
in the way
Did this ever get resolved?I'd be eager to hear about any trouble with gyp.
-BradN
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Jim Roskind wrote:
> Just a wild guess... please ignore if this is not applicable:
>
> Any chance you pulled on Friday eve between 5pm and 8pm pacific time? If
> so, you might h
It randomly happen on windows try slave every day.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Bradley Nelson wrote:
> Did this ever get resolved?I'd be eager to hear about any trouble with
> gyp.
>
> -BradN
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Jim Roskind wrote:
>
>> Just a wild guess... please ignore i
I think I see what's happening.maruel, do I understand correctly that the
trybot syncs to the revision the patch is based on before applying it? It
looks like when folks with patchs prior to the base-gyp switch do a try,
that it rolls things back, which doesn't work right.
If folks sync before try
Actually, they sync to whatever rev they are being told. So roughly:1.
gclient revert
2. gclient sync --revision
3. patch
4. if a DEPS file changed: gclient sync --revision (again)
5. gclient runhooks
I forgot if runhooks is always run or not. The fact that the .vcproj files
are clobbered and reg
What does "gclient status" show on Windows? It needs to not show "?"
for any of the .vcproj/.sln files that GYP generates. Otherwise, the
trybots will remove the .vcproj/.sln files when they run "gclient
revert".
Mark
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers ma
They are not svn:ignored. One of the thing I'm afraid of is that even if a
generated .vcproj is patched, it wouldn't be fixed on next try. I assume
that I'm wrong.
At the same time, I'd like GYP to _not_ overwrite a generated file if it
hasn't changed. This way, a full rebuild wouldn't be triggered
The problem with that list is that we alternately generate the sln
files (from gyp), and then try to update and revert them via svn. The
remnant files generated by gyp screw up the process :-(.
To make it all work in the interim, you need to add step between 1 and 2 that:
1a) Delete sln and vcp
That's what is currently happening Jim, look at the stdio.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jim Roskind wrote:
> The problem with that list is that we alternately generate the sln
> files (from gyp), and then try to update and revert them via svn. The
> remnant files generated by gyp screw up t
Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
> They are not svn:ignored.
OK, anything that's GYP-generated does need to be in svn:ignore.
> One of the thing I'm afraid of is that even if a
> generated .vcproj is patched, it wouldn't be fixed on next try.
If a (bad!) patch that's sent to a try server touches a .vcp
Jim Roskind wrote:
> The problem with that list is that we alternately generate the sln
> files (from gyp), and then try to update and revert them via svn. The
> remnant files generated by gyp screw up the process :-(.
OK, that's bad. I thought Brad took steps to ensure that we'd either
generat
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Mark Mentovai wrote:
> Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
> > They are not svn:ignored.
>
> OK, anything that's GYP-generated does need to be in svn:ignore.
>
Not understanding why?
>
> > One of the thing I'm afraid of is that even if a
> > generated .vcproj is patched,
It certainly was my intention to have atomic changes that remove sln/vcprojs
in the same change that causes them to be generated.Did you mean something
stronger Mark?
-BradN
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Mark Mentovai wrote:
> Jim Roskind wrote:
> > The problem with that list is that we alt
Bradley Nelson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Mark Mentovai wrote:
>> OK, anything that's GYP-generated does need to be in svn:ignore.
>
> Not understanding why?
The try servers clean out previous state with "gclient revert", which
will remove any file that shows up as "?" in "svn sta
Bradley Nelson wrote:
> It certainly was my intention to have atomic changes that remove sln/vcprojs
> in the same change that causes them to be generated.
> Did you mean something stronger Mark?
Nope, that's exactly what I meant and all of the changelists I saw
from you did do this. It seems th
Oh yes, the presence or absence of svn:ignore on a file should not affect
its success on the trybot.
-BradN
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Mark Mentovai wrote:
> Bradley Nelson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Mark Mentovai
> wrote:
> >> OK, anything that's GYP-generated does need
i use a tarball first,then try update to the latest.
btw, when i ran gclient sync, got those message
-running 'svn update F:\chromium\src' in 'F:\chromium'
At revision 11935
-running 'svn update F:\chromium\src/third_party/WebKit --revision
11916' in 'F:\chromium'
svn:Target path does not
rd /q /s f:\chromium\src\third_parth\Webkitgclient sync
gclient runhooks --force
that should do it.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:31 AM, zyn wrote:
>
> i use a tarball first,then try update to the latest.
> btw, when i ran gclient sync, got those message
> -running 'svn update F:\chromium\src'
Thank you,everything back to normal!
On Mar 18, 8:43 pm, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
> rd /q /s f:\chromium\src\third_parth\Webkitgclient sync
> gclient runhooks --force
>
> that should do it.
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:31 AM, zyn wrote:
>
> > i use a tarball first,then try update to the latest
21 matches
Mail list logo
