2008/9/27 rafael2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ow, it was quite easy to fix.
> Can anyone review the patch to fix cinelerra w/ the newer ffmpeg API?
> I think the fix is correct, as I got it looking at the ffmpeg svn diff.
>
What if this fix is present while an older ffmpeg api is used ?
In the vlc ca
2008/7/8 Chad Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey all-
>
> Compiling the latest cvs version I've run into a snag with the ffmpeg
> libraries (I think anyway). I end up with some linker errors at the end:
>
> fmpeg.o(.text+0x6f): In function `FFMPEG::~FFMPEG()':
> /home/cparker/src/cinelerra/hvirtual/
2008/6/11 David Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm building cinelerra from source since there appears to be no debian
> etch binary.
>
> I'm having problems to get certain source files to recoginize the
> OpenGL headers properly, for example:
>
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/cinelerr
e a newer snapshoot for you.
You will also have some patches that are currently discussed on this list .
> 2008/6/10 Raffaella Traniello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 13:04 +0200, KH KH wrote:
>> > The instruction aren't good (
2008/6/10 Martin Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've followed the instructions at http://cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.php
> for installing cinelerra from an rpm, using yum, to Fedora 9 (x86_64
> architecture), but I am getting an error that no package was found.
The instruction aren't good ( som
2008/5/31 Johannes Sixt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Friday 30 May 2008 03:32, KH KH wrote:
>> 2008/5/19 Johannes Sixt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > On Monday 19 May 2008 13:53, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> >> - sed -i -e 's|linux/time.h|time.h|' confi
2008/5/19 Johannes Sixt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 19 May 2008 13:53, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> Fonts
>> - The cinelerra package bundles many fonts (used by the title plugins)
>> that doesn't seems even redistributable (usually found with the
>> mscorefonts package).
>> This should be avoided
2008/5/29 Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Attached patch against svn trunk for gcc 4.3. (taken from gentoo package)
+1
This patch is mandatory for gcc 4.3
(altought already submitted on the list previously).
Nicolas (kwizart)
>
> Please apply.
>
> --
> Hanno Böck Blog: htt
2008/5/29 Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fixes some compilation warnings, please apply against current svn trunk.
I'm talking here as a maintainer of cinelerra for Fedora.
Please note that this kind of patches are highly problematic.
(i'm not against applying them i they are needed)
Since cinele
2008/4/29 Joona Palaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 17:22 +0200, KH KH wrote:
> > 2008/4/29 Joona Palaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 09:52 +0200, KH KH wrote:
> > > > I have a preco
2008/4/29 Thomas King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 09:52 +0200, KH KH wrote:
> >> I have a precompiled cinelerra version using rpm.livna.org as a base
> >> See here:
> >> rpm -ivh http://rpms.kwizart.net/kwizart-release
2008/4/29 Joona Palaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 09:52 +0200, KH KH wrote:
> > I have a precompiled cinelerra version using rpm.livna.org as a base
> > See here:
> > rpm -ivh http://rpms.kwizart.net/kwizart-release-8.rpm
> > yum --
I have a precompiled cinelerra version using rpm.livna.org as a base
See here:
rpm -ivh http://rpms.kwizart.net/kwizart-release-8.rpm
yum --enablerepo=kwizart install cinelerra
shmmax is set by the package. (you won't have to tweak it)
If you want , you can compile a newer snapshoot using the cinel
core-ldl -ldl
yeah, looks ok
ah, i messed up avfilter pkg-config generation
don't have enabled swscale nor avfilter thougjt... seems ok...
i'll correct the patch in a couple of days and send to review
in ffmpeg-devel
...
> bye,
> rafael diniz
>
> Em Wednesday 23
2008/4/23 rafael2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hi all,
>
> yes, this package is not correct.
> the right location is
> /usr/include/libavcodec
> /usr/include/libswscale
> ...
>
> I suggest you to contact your package mantainer to comunicate the wrong path
> of the includes, or make the package by
2008/3/28, robcanning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >> raw1394 - failed to get handle: No such file or directory.
> >>
>
> hi,
> there is a problem with libraw1394 in debian at the moment - somthing to
> do with the transition to juju or something - i have contacted the
> maintainer of libraw1394
2008/3/27, Norval Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> I managed to capture by booting into a 2.6.22 kernel and running dvgrab as
> root.
> The system I can't capture with has the following:
why running as root ? you need to set the appropriate permissions for /dev/fw0
an easy way of doing this i
2008/3/27, Herman Robak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:34:30 +0100, KH KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Now the remaining problem are with userland app not yet compatible.
> > that's the only reason any want to keep the "old/depre
2008/3/26, Norval Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> Has anybody had any success capturing dv video with the new firewire modules
> (kernels 2.6.22+ I think) and dvgrab or kino?
> The only solution I have found so far is here (bottom of the page)
> http://sidux.com/PNphpBB2-printview-t-8772-st
2008/1/14, Burkhard Plaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> KH KH schrieb:
> > 2008/1/10, Burkhard Plaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>> Hash: SHA512
> >>>
> >>
2008/1/8, Johannes Sixt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008 16:29, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > I'm testing gcc 4.3.0 targeted for Fedora 9.
> > while compiling cinelerra (svn 20080105), I have an error
> > (might have others)
> >
> > playback3d.h: At global scope:
> > playback3d.h:228:
2008/1/10, Burkhard Plaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > As subject says.
>
> yes
Which version of nasm are you using:
with nasm-0.98.39
[EMAIL PROTECTED] video]$ nasm -f elf64 reconmmx.s -o reconmmx.o
nasm: fatal: unrecognised output for
2008/1/11, Jeff Gerritsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As an admenment to my priop post I'm running on FC6.
I have Fedora 8 package for cinlerra that fit well the livna third
part repository
As FC6 is now end of life you could consider upgrading...
> Jeff Gerritsen
>
> On Friday 11 January 2008 03:48:22
2007/12/21, Дмитрий Пекаровский <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:45:27 +0100
> "KH KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Did you compiled ffmpeg with swscale ? cinelerra ins't compatible with
> > this option nowadays...
>
> Thank
2007/12/20, Дмитрий Пекаровский <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> Is any roundabout a way possible for compiling cinelerra with
> ffmpeg-external?
>
>
> ffmpeg.o: In function `FFMPEG::convert_cmodel(VFrame*, VFrame*)':
> ffmpeg.C:(.text+0x483): undefined reference to `img_convert'
> ffmpeg.o: In
2007/12/18, Jonathan Ryshpan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm building Cinelerra under Fedora 8 running on a x86_64 system.
>
> No problems downloading the source, etc.
>
> A number of straightforward looking patches to header files similar to
> the following are needed to get various things to compile,
2007/12/11, Eric Mesa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey,
>
> May I suggest adding to the installation instructions, the following:
>
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=188264&page=3
Last time i've checked mmx support on x86_64 was "strange". I wi
2007/10/22, toby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Alexis,
>
> looks like svn code hasn't seen any update regaring the issue with
> swscale enabled external ffmpeg.
>
> Here is what I had to do to compile latest SVN on a Debian system
> utilizing external ffmpeg (libavcodeccvs51)
> provided by Christian Ma
2007/11/13, Johannes Sixt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks.
>
> On Tuesday 13 November 2007 17:49, KH KH wrote:
> > http://www.pipapo.org/gitweb?p=cinelerra/mob;a=commit;h=88e99c04955c5a7e052
> >c78c38fed61c30f1572dc This will fix undefined-non-weak-symbol rpmlint
> >
Hi!
I've commited two patches from a svn based version to mob public git repository:
http://www.pipapo.org/gitweb?p=cinelerra/mob;a=commit;h=0f76346bd2a235108fe2e74086b6d804bb0081f8
Used to compile cinelerra with a newer ffmpeg version (at least
ffmpeg-0.4.9-0.41.20071011). This work on an older f
olf - Livna
compatible package)
This is still a testing step (so the package would be added to RPM Fusion)
>
> On Nov 12, 2007 2:57 PM, KH KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/11/12, Aaron Newcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > As a followup it looks like Jarod Wi
2007/11/12, Aaron Newcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As a followup it looks like Jarod Wilson is working on a fix for this.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=246f2bbb0711091118y79cc1bddt47e4c3254777a1a9%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=kino-dev
Yes there is still some problem act
with the juju stack )
Nicolas (kwizart)
>
> On 10/11/2007, KH KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/11/10, Martin Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Nothing there, but if I do
> > >
> > > sudo grep ohci /var/log/messages
> > >
> >
86 or x86_64 for now...)
Nicolas (kwizart)
>
>
>
> On 09/11/2007, KH KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > 2007/11/9, Martin Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >:
> > > How can I tell? It's from VIA Technologies; that's all the information
> I'm
> > >
Nicolas (kwizart)
>
>
> On 09/11/2007, KH KH < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 2007/11/9, Martin Ellison < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Fedora 8 is out with just a passing mention of improved Firewire support
> in
> > > the release notes; d
2007/11/9, Martin Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fedora 8 is out with just a passing mention of improved Firewire support in
> the release notes; does anyone know if this is 'improved' as in Fedora 7 or
> does it work again now?
Again! It depend on your hardware!
ohci 1.1 compatibles devices are kn
2007/10/27, Martin Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There used to be Fedora Core and Fedora Extras. They merged them, hence just
> Fedora now.
>
> Firewire support is broken on F7.
Firewire isn't broken on Fedora, this is mythology. But actually only
newer firewire devices (or somehow some models) a
2007/10/26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I haven't dug through the archives, but I thought I'd post up my recent
> experience with installing FC7 and cinelerra from freshrpms.
>
> --
>
> I managed to get cinelerra 2.1 running on FC7 without too much pain. It's
> a vanilla FC7 instal
38 matches
Mail list logo
