flavio wrote:
There, there, sorry for the immense delay - I had to check most of the
files by myself after all and in a moment in which work was violent around here:
http://cvs.cinelerra.org/docs/wiki/doku.php?do=show&id=cinelerrafileslicensestatus
...
File checking has reached its end. Notes
Good. Sorry for the delay, been busy around here.
We are in 8 here to do the job, let's see how far we get.
The command
svn export hvirtual hvirtual-ex
didn't work here. we'll be using
svn checkout svn://svn.skolelinux.org/cinelerra/trunk/hvirtual
to get the archives, if that's ok with you.
[Please do try to keep replies on the list]
Hi Flavio, thanks for your volunteering spirit.
flavio wrote:
Nathan, hallellujah! That's the answer I was hoping for. Thanks. As soon as
possible, I'll see as to get people into action here. Just to diminish the
error-margin of comprehension here tho
flavio wrote:
i think i can help.
Great!
to do so, however, i need to know exactly how to scan the files. this
how-to should be written along with this info here
http://cvs.cinelerra.org/docs/wiki/doku.php?id=cinelerrafileslicensestatus,
i suppose. as far i have understood, i need to have
Hi,
On Friday 02 March 2007 20:48, Andraž Tori wrote:
> There can be a directory-wide filename that specifies licence for all .C
> files in directory...
>
> It does not need to be in every file separately (altough some people
> like it that way, but it is not mandatory)
(both) right.
regards,
There can be a directory-wide filename that specifies licence for all .C
files in directory...
It does not need to be in every file separately (altough some people
like it that way, but it is not mandatory)
bye
andraz
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 16:04 -0300, flavio wrote:
> I am following the previous
I am following the previous thread's discussion that stated it as I wrote.
Thanks for the reply, but it still doesn't answer my question: how to do it?
2007/3/2, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 19:34, flavio wrote:
> when scanning, then, if there is a head
Hi,
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 19:34, flavio wrote:
> when scanning, then, if there is a header saying it is GPL, LGPL or if
> there is no header at all, the file is fine, no reports. if it says
> anything else, post a report for further investigation. is that it?
As I understand it, no heade
btw, something that might serve as incentive for someone to answer me: we
can effectively move about 4 or 5 people to help with this thing here. we
want to help, hands on.
hi there, first post on the list.
i think i can help. i am quite busy finishing the translation of the
cinelerra's manual to brazilian portuguese (
http://estudiolivre.org/tiki-index.php?page=cinelerra_manualcompleto), but i
might have some time next week to start helping on this issue, since i t
Cory K. wrote:
The Ubuntu Studio project has set up Cinelerra on Bzr so we can have
multiple people work on it. The plan is to submit our changes back
upstream when we're done hopefully they're accepted.
Are you saying that you're auditing the licenses there, or just making
Ubuntu Studio inte
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 09:48 -0500, Cory K. wrote:
> The Ubuntu Studio project has set up Cinelerra on Bzr so we can have
> multiple people work on it. The plan is to submit our changes back
> upstream when we're done hopefully they're accepted.
>
> I hope we get some help because it honestly fee
The Ubuntu Studio project has set up Cinelerra on Bzr so we can have
multiple people work on it. The plan is to submit our changes back
upstream when we're done hopefully they're accepted.
I hope we get some help because it honestly feels like nobody on this
list or IRC cares.
If you would l
Ubuntu are hoping to include Cinelerra-CV into UbuntuStudio. Does this mean
that they will look at the GPL-status stuff?
marks
On 2/25/07, Andraž Tori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
when somebody finds a file that he thinks there are issues with, we'll
take a careful look into it.
i expect tho
when somebody finds a file that he thinks there are issues with, we'll
take a careful look into it.
i expect those that want to get cinelerra into ubuntu to do the checking
and report issues on this mailing list.
after all that talk i really expected something to happen by now
bye
andraz
On S
[I started writing this as a reply to the previous GPL thread, but since
I hadn't made significant progress so I didn't bother to post. The
draft mail has now been sitting in my mailbox for 3+ weeks so I'd better
just send what I have now.]
Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote:
I was wondering what
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 23:38 +0100, Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was wondering what te current status is of the intention to get
> Cinelerra in the Ubuntu repositories by checking all the licenses of
> each file?
Well, have you done anything about it?
Do you have a list of
Hi there,
I was wondering what te current status is of the intention to get
Cinelerra in the Ubuntu repositories by checking all the licenses of
each file?
Also i would like to comment that LGPL licenced code is no problem for
Ubuntu. I found out today that the core of the Gstreamer framewor
18 matches
Mail list logo
