Johannes Sixt wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 March 2007 22:46, you wrote:
>>> Replacing Asset* in parameter lists by Asset& is certainly not worth it.
>>> You gain absolutely nothing, but only introduce a lot of unnecessary code
>>> changes. Please don't do that.
>> replaced Asset* with Asset_GC which is
En/na Nathan Ryan ha escrit:
Any thoughts or advice you as the developer community can pass on would
be great. In particular I would like to know more about how we could
work with you guys to create the best possible software. Also, in the
case of the grants (if and when) - are there any cine
Johannes Sixt wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 March 2007 19:25, Christian Thaeter wrote:
>>> Remove the Garbage collector in favor of boost::shared_ptr, the GC has
>>> some nasty bugs, partially together with threads. By replacing ALL
>>> Asset* with boost::shared_ptr these should be fixed on expanse of
>
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 19:25, Christian Thaeter wrote:
> > Remove the Garbage collector in favor of boost::shared_ptr, the GC has
> > some nasty bugs, partially together with threads. By replacing ALL
> > Asset* with boost::shared_ptr these should be fixed on expanse of
> > some performance.
I
Christian Thaeter wrote:
> you might pull it with git
> git clone git://git.pipapo.org/git/cinelerra/ct
correction:
git clone git://git.pipapo.org/cinelerra/ct
> or
> git clone git://repo.or.cz/cinelerra_cv/ct.git
not yet
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Ci
Nathan Ryan wrote:
> Hey all, First off, apologies if I am replying to this incorrectly -
> I usually read mailing lists, rarely post.
>
> I thought Hermann's comment about dev manpower was worth me coming
> out of my shell.
>
> I work as tech support at a film department in an University of fin
Message: 6 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
Subject: Re: [CinCVS] fixing cinelerra, using standard C++ libs etc.
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:26:19 +0100 Reply-To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 10:20 +0100 schrieb Christian Thaeter:
Finally I found some time to look at some
> Remove the Garbage collector in favor of boost::shared_ptr, the GC has
> some nasty bugs, partially together with threads. By replacing ALL
> Asset* with boost::shared_ptr these should be fixed on expanse of
> some performance.
>
> Manage Assets in std::vector /
> std::list.
First things done:
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 15:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 10:20 +0100 schrieb Christian Thaeter:
> Finally I found some time to look at some cinelerra bugs. Cinelerra use
> > quite some own things..
>
> > I believe the code complexity could be lowered by replac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 10:20 +0100 schrieb Christian Thaeter:
> Finally I found some time to look at some cinelerra bugs. Cinelerra use
>> quite some own things..
>
>> I believe the code complexity could be lowered by replacing some
>> things with standard or d
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 10:20 +0100 schrieb Christian Thaeter:
Finally I found some time to look at some cinelerra bugs. Cinelerra use
> quite some own things..
> I believe the code complexity could be lowered by replacing some
> things with standard or defacto-standard libs rather fixing
Finally I found some time to look at some cinelerra bugs. Cinelerra use
quite some own things (which is natural since the cinelerra codebase
predates the C++ standard).
I believe the code complexity could be lowered by replacing some
things with standard or defacto-standard libs rather fixing the
12 matches
Mail list logo
