RE: 350-001 Expiry date [7:47744]

2002-06-30 Thread Silju Pillai
HI, As per Cisco, it is expected to get retire by late july. regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47778t=47744 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report

RE: Cat 5000 Problems [7:47775]

2002-06-30 Thread _ Einstooge _
You may want to check the following and all the links contained within http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/76.html#EARL?; Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47780t=47775 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription

Re: CCIE Lab Help [7:47736]

2002-06-30 Thread suaveguru
hi , Can we study together ? I am also preparing for my CCIE lab suaveguru --- Lan Wong wrote: Hi Group, I've just finished my CCIE Written today after studying for two months. I need some advice as to how to start my CCIE lab study. I am not sure where or how to start. I have most

RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]

2002-06-30 Thread Oleg Oz
Frank, Like you I did not study for the beta exam (I wanted to know what it was all about and not loose 300 bucks.) I have not received my graded beta exam yet not did I expect to pass (however if the pass grade was 45, I may have passed.) You are on target with saying that the current exam

RE: new CIT [7:47777]

2002-06-30 Thread Dan Penn
I'm taking it this Wednesday, but if you check out the exam outlines for 506 and 606 from CCO they are the EXACT same word for word. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ciscoguru Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 1:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]

2002-06-30 Thread Frank Merrill
BTW: I highly recommend attending the PS session (or atleast trying to get your hand on a copy of the PS CCIE book) Unfortunately the company I'm with isn't going to pay for the PS, and so I actually won't be attending, but I grabbed the PDF of the presentation from last years

need clarification on some PIX terms [7:47786]

2002-06-30 Thread voitek
I am working on cisco pix exam (571) and I found myself confused on some terms. I read cisco docs on the web page but it confused me even more. so, here we go, if someone can put 2 cents into it I will be appreciated. what is the difference between nat (inside) 1 0 0 and nat 1 0 0 one

RE: rip summary-address [7:47787]

2002-06-30 Thread Annu Roopa
Louis, From the link sent by one of them it looks the following only will work.The Ethernet interface major network should match ur summary address net.I understand there may be a requirement to have E0 with 172.17.5.1 but configure this and try. int e0 ip address 172.31.5.1 255.255.255.0 ip

Re: new CIT [7:47777]

2002-06-30 Thread Tom Scott
Dan Penn wrote: I'm taking it this Wednesday, but if you check out the exam outlines for 506 and 606 from CCO they are the EXACT same word for word. I'm taking it Friday or the week after. I hope you'll post a review after you take it Wednesday. The Big Question I have is: Are they testing

RE: new CIT [7:47777]

2002-06-30 Thread Dan Penn
Well, per the new NDA, I won't really be able to say much about it after words. But I know this much, basic routing functions are testable...stuff like what can go wrong, network statements etc. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom

RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]

2002-06-30 Thread Oleg Oz
Yes, I meant the book that you get when you attend the CCIE Power Session. My company did not want to pay for it either, until I said I would pay for it myself. Go figure, beside 450 bucks is nothing with respect to the information that you get out of it! Oleg Oz. Message Posted at:

Re: RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47791]

2002-06-30 Thread LongTrip
Chalk it up to the newbie to ask What is the PS CCIE book? Kim From: Frank Merrill Date: 2002/06/30 Sun PM 12:44:23 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764] BTW: I highly recommend attending the PS session (or

Re: RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San D [7:47791]

2002-06-30 Thread Oleg Oz
Sorry, I should have been more clear. What I meant to say was the CCIE Power Session Manual - you get this when you attend the CCIE power session at Networkers (Cisco's networking event) Oleg Oz. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47792t=47791

Study Guide for the Written Exam [7:47793]

2002-06-30 Thread Hamid
Hi, Any recommended readings for the written exam ? I have already studied the following books: - Routing TCP/IP by Doyle - Cisco LAN Switchinf (CCIE Professional Developement Series) By HamiltonClark - Cisco Certification, by Caslow I was just wondering wether these books were enough for

Re: RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San D [7:47791]

2002-06-30 Thread LongTrip
Thanks... For me that will have to be a next year thing. :) Kim From: Oleg Oz Date: 2002/06/30 Sun PM 04:50:33 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San D [7:47791] Sorry, I should have been more clear. What I meant to say was the CCIE

RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]

2002-06-30 Thread ken clifford
I took the beta also. I just my results missed by 9% but I went in without having the new topics mastered so expected something like that. The exam felt better overall...seemed practical focused. I am heading out to networkers in Orlando in a week and I am going to hit the CCIE PS and on day 2

Any last minute words of advice? [7:47798]

2002-06-30 Thread LongTrip
Tuesday morning I am writing the VPN portion of the CSS1. I thought it would be a good idea to write it while the course I took is still fresh in my mind. I have gone over the course material and searched through CCO looking for other relevant data that may happen to be on the exam. Has anyone

Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-30 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 8:44 PM -0400 6/29/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: At 12:49 PM 6/29/02, Michael L. Williams wrote: I have successfully used both an all-zeros and an all-ones subnet on Windows 9x. (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.255.0/24) Works fine. Those aren't subnets, though, since it's class C. Priscilla

Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-30 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
I figured you would yell at me for saying Class C. :-) Priscilla At 05:55 PM 6/30/02, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: At 8:44 PM -0400 6/29/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: At 12:49 PM 6/29/02, Michael L. Williams wrote: I have successfully used both an all-zeros and an all-ones subnet on

RE: need clarification on some PIX terms [7:47786]

2002-06-30 Thread ken clifford
both nat commands are effectively the same. I tried it on a pix 501 I have kicking around with 6.2.1 on it. netmask and inside/outside question are valid as they twist the syntax around all the time. Ken Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47801t=47786

Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-30 Thread Kevin Cullimore
It seems to have more to do with the nature of the code forced to interpret it than any inherent properties of the number corresponding to the address - Original Message - From: Howard C. Berkowitz To: Sent: 30 June 2002 5:55 pm Subject: Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] At 8:44 PM

RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]

2002-06-30 Thread Lopez, Robert
I'm taking the written tomorrow morning at 10am est. All you folks are an inspiration...I'll let you know what happens. Robert -Original Message- From: ken clifford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 5:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Passed CCIE written at

Re: IP Phones behind Checkpoint firewall [7:47739]

2002-06-30 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Yes, but why does PAT break up Cisco IP phones? Is it because the l3 addres is in another portion of the packet, like it is in h.323? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Chuck wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... My first thought is that the proper TCP ports have not been

CCIE Written DPT/SRT - huh? [7:47807]

2002-06-30 Thread Nick Lesewski
On the requirements for new CCIE Written Beta they listed DPT/SRT under the WAN section, but I can't find any references these in the groupstudy archives or on the Cisco website. Anybody have any idea what they might be asking about? NIC

Re: CCIE Written DPT/SRT - huh? [7:47807]

2002-06-30 Thread Gaz
Hi Nick, You sure it was SRT? SRP makes more sense when linked with DPT. URL below may help if that's the case: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120 limit/120s/srpapsgs.htm#xtocid1 watch the wrap Gaz Nick Lesewski wrote in message [EMAIL

Re: NDA violations (FW: New Legal Agreement--Cisco Career [7:47810]

2002-06-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hummm. I am thinking the same thing. Knowing the amount of test questions is paramount to pacing yourself. I guess the only to be prepare of this now is to do like 100 questions in say 60 minutes and just be super ready. StrangeI thought the 1st Amendment still had power in the

Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-30 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 8:03 PM -0400 6/30/02, Chuck wrote: Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... At 8:44 PM -0400 6/29/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: At 12:49 PM 6/29/02, Michael L. Williams wrote: I have successfully used both an all-zeros and an all-ones subnet

Re: CCIE Written DPT/SRT - huh? [7:47807]

2002-06-30 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
On the requirements for new CCIE Written Beta they listed DPT/SRT under the WAN section, but I can't find any references these in the groupstudy archives or on the Cisco website. Anybody have any idea what they might be asking about? NIC Good question. DPT might be Dynamic Packet Transport,

Re: NDA violations (FW: New Legal Agreement--Cisco Career [7:47813]

2002-06-30 Thread Michael L. Williams
Not if you agree to give it up (as you must if you want the certification). =) Mike W. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hummm. I am thinking the same thing. Knowing the amount of test questions is paramount to pacing yourself. I guess the only to be

Re: CCIE Written DPT/SRT - huh? [7:47807]

2002-06-30 Thread LongTrip
Do you mean DPT/SRP? If so, it is not that difficult to understand, from a support point of view. My last employer had DPT/SRP rings deployed in different cities. It made moving information around easier and less expensive. From a technical point of view I would have to reread the

Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-30 Thread Chuck
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... At 8:03 PM -0400 6/30/02, Chuck wrote: Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... At 8:44 PM -0400 6/29/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: At 12:49 PM 6/29/02, Michael

Re: CCIE Written DPT/SRT - huh? [7:47807]

2002-06-30 Thread Nigel Taylor
Nick, A good place to begin your exploration of DPT and SRP in particular is always the rfc2892, but for a really cool overview check out hte following link.. http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/17/documents/presentations/tutorial/tutor ial.htm HTH Nigel P.S. there's so much info on

RE: new CIT [7:47777]

2002-06-30 Thread Mark Odette II
They haven't reduced them by any means I took the exam and unfortunately failed this last Saturday. I'll be retaking it on Tuesday. I failed because of several instances of the questions being worded funny... and I didn't realize until I was hitting the button that I had just chosen the