Re: Routing and Design Problem [7:57193]

2002-11-10 Thread Peter van Oene
sounds like you might want to hire a consultant. On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 12:23, Tunji Suleiman wrote: > Hi Group, > > I have a routing problem. I am certain my present config is alright and just > need a routing entry from the ISP for things to work. But the ISP is not > cooperating, insisting the

copying TOS in VPDN PPTP [7:57194]

2002-11-10 Thread Stephane Litkowski
Hi all, I'm trying to do some QoS features on PPTP tunnels, so I want the TOS field from original IP header to be copied to the tunnel IP header. I tried the command "ip tos reflect" but it doesn't work. IOS version is 12.2(11)T IP PLUS. Did anybody already try it ? Here is my config : vpdn-group

Routing and Design Problem [7:57193]

2002-11-10 Thread Tunji Suleiman
Hi Group, I have a routing problem. I am certain my present config is alright and just need a routing entry from the ISP for things to work. But the ISP is not cooperating, insisting the problem is with my config. So I want to make sure I've not explored all options b4 reverting to them. Here'

Re: How RIPv1 masks are determined - confused [7:57049]

2002-11-10 Thread Robert Slaski
Tom Martin wrote: > Robert, > > I believe that your diagram should reflect R1's serial interface to R2 > as s0/1 instead of s0/0. This caused me some confusion in trying to > figure out the configs. Actually, there is still some confusion given Sorry for that - this was copy-pasting error (ther

RE: Congrats you passed... psyche... you didn't [7:57183]

2002-11-10 Thread Cisco Nuts
Sue the damn *#@!!! :-) That's really messed up man.How could they mess up somthing like this? Here is what I would "fight" for.Atleast a free lab for the 2nd try and some goodies! Good Luck!! >From: "Juan Blanco" >Reply-To: "Juan Blanco" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Congrats

RE: Problem pinging from inside thru PIX to outside [7:57188]

2002-11-10 Thread Elijah Savage III
09186a0080094e8a.shtml#pingown Look at that link watchout for word wrap. Hope it helps. You have to enable ping terminating on a pix interface. -Original Message- From: Tunji Suleiman [mailto:tunjisule@;hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 9:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: P

Problem pinging from inside thru PIX to outside [7:57188]

2002-11-10 Thread Tunji Suleiman
Hi Group, I am trying to deploy a VPN solution and ran into a seemingly simple problem which I cant seem able to resolve. I terminated the radio link from the ISP on fa0/0 of my Cisco 2621 router. I connected fa0/1 of 2621 to e0/0, the outside of my PIX 506 by cross cable and connected e0/1, th

RE: VPN Concentrator Issue [7:57185]

2002-11-10 Thread Elijah Savage III
>From my little knowledge the pix supports ipsec passthru, meaning there should be nothing special you have to do to the pix to get it to work with this setup. But are you using NAT because if so there may be some adjustment on the vpn client that needs to be adjusted like enabling transparent tunn

RE: VTP Concentrator - client to client [7:44276]

2002-11-10 Thread Arni V. Skarphedinsson
Yes you can do this with the Reverse Route Injection, I have used it, it´s easy to setup. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57186&t=44276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/c

VPN Concentrator Issue [7:57185]

2002-11-10 Thread Arni V. Skarphedinsson
I Have the folowing setup VPN-Client--VPN-Concentrator---ipsec-tunnel---PIX Connections from the networks on the inside of the pix to the concentrator private network workes fine connections from the VPN Client to the concentrator private network worke fine. But I cant connect from the Insi

RE: Congrats you passed... psyche... you didn't [7:57183]

2002-11-10 Thread Juan Blanco
Michale, That really hurts, I am sorry and don't give up you will do fine next time, Sometime God test us in many different ways that we can not explains, he works in a very strange way. What bothers me the most is the not apologies from Cisco. Juan Blanco -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: Congrats you passed... psyche... you didn't [7:57181]

2002-11-10 Thread Juan Blanco
Michale, That really hurts, I am sorry and don't give up you will do fine next time, Sometime God test us in many different ways that we can not explains, he works in a very strange way. What bothers me the most is the not apologies from Cisco. Juan Blanco -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: VoIP+QoS+xDSL+H.323Gatekeeper [7:57104]

2002-11-10 Thread Bruce Enders
Mark, I saw something similar to this on a customer's pilot of AVVID. The symptoms were such that if a call between IP phones was established prior to the traffic flood, everything worked just fine. If the traffic flood came first, the destination IP phone rang, but no voice packets were receiv

RE: WLAN security matters [7:57160]

2002-11-10 Thread mike greenberg
Most financial corportations that implement Wireless LAN (WAN) ususally do this: 1) Implement EAP-TLS. This method is "open-standard" as opposed to LEAP which is Cisco propriatery. Furthermore, LEAP is vulnerable to "man in the middle attack" while EAP-TLS is not. EAP-TLS supports mutual authen

Message ("Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2002 07:42:35...") [7:57180]

2002-11-10 Thread
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2002 07:42:35 -0500 (EST) with subject "Of service" has been submitted to the moderator of the CAREPL-L list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57180&t=57180 --