Tiongster 84 wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi guys,
I just want to make sure is there any LANE on CCNP switching?
I don't know, but what does the blueprint say?
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exams/640-604.html#examtop
watch the wrap
Jason Viera wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The individuals writing the book probably aren't privy to any exam content
changes that are around the corner unless they are a part of the CCIE
team,
another misconception is that Cisco Press is in close contact with
technology changes
hebn wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes.
how does cisco router propagate router-lsa whose size exceed 1500
bytes(more than 122 links in one area)?
I've browsed through the other responses, and I did not see this particular
piece of
I'm not sure Cisco is even playing in this space at the moment.
IIRC, 802.16 is the IEEE standard for wireless metropolitan area networks.
I checked Promim's site, and they don't have much but a couple of press
releases.
might also want to look at places like:
Roberts, Larry wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just looking to get others opinions on this book. I'm just now to the OSPF
chapter, and I have already found several pages worth of mistakes.
I have an e-mail into ciscopress with a listing of the errors, and I
understand that any first
Zsombor Papp wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 07:54 AM 7/12/2003 +, Hemingway wrote:
hebn wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes.
how does cisco router propagate router-lsa whose size exceed 1500
bytes(more than 122 links
simon watson wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Some how I was thinking VLAN tagging was something more than just
Trunking
in Cisco talk,as you can guess I'm pretty rusty when it comes to
switching.I
have another question.Look at the example below.
any one fine out
Cheers,
Heiman.
Hemingway wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
anyone who is serious about CCIE lab prep should become familiar with
this
site:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/
start your reading here. everything yoiu need to know can be found
Zsombor Papp wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:12 PM 7/3/2003 +, Rajesh Kumar wrote:
How about configuring a storm control for multicast which will avoid
these
problems?
I think she tried it (see config at the end) and it didn't work. I also
think btw that storm control is
anyone who is serious about CCIE lab prep should become familiar with this
site:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/
start your reading here. everything yoiu need to know can be found somewhere
within the links provided.
H T wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Can any one
Nelson Herron wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a failry generic three-router ospf set that I am trying to cross
with
a virtual link:
R1 (area0, area 3) R2 (area 3) R4 (area 3, 23)
(192.168.255.245/30)(192.168.255.254/30)
[area 3 virt
simon watson wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Some how I was thinking VLAN tagging was something more than just
Trunking
in Cisco talk,as you can guess I'm pretty rusty when it comes to
switching.I
have another question.Look at the example below.
is a wireless bridge the same as an ethernet bridge?
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is Fiber considered wireless?
-Original Message-
From: Weaselboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
COFFEE INSTRUCTIONS (for coffee lovers)
Cousin Elly is the world's worst at getting instructions mixed up. When
she got married her husband bought her one of those fancy, electric
coffee makers. It had all the latest gadgets on it. Salesman Riley
carefully explained how everything worked; how to
Vikram JeetSingh wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
Well, we all know that due to technology advancements, today the IPLCs (or
read leased line circuits) are a lot cheaper so there is not real need to
transport voice or video on Satellite links, but then the satellite links
do
Being paranoid about what topics of conversation are permissible, let me
just say that the blueprint is certainly worth reviewing. The test itself
covered quite a bit of material from I would call the CCNP track - routing,
switching, etc, along with the thingsd I remember from the CID test a few
Edwin R. Gonzalez wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now what? Cisco has decided to add something else to the
treacherous terrain.
Equipment List
a.. 2600 series routers
b.. 3600 series routers
c.. Catalyst 3550 series switches
d.. 3700 series routers*
*On July 7 2003, the
will take siome
time, read up, and ask your customer some questions so that you understand
the desired result, thus making the configuration support that result.
best wishes
Hemingway
Thanks
Simon.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71725t=71703
ignore my previous post. been a lab rat for too long.
Brian Carroll wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S! ALL!
The desired result is to allow only the default route to be sent to a
neighbor in AS2.
First way I did it:
router bgp 1
nei 192.168.100.10 remote-as 2
nei
I don't see the need for either the distribute-list or the route-map since
you are not otherwise placing routes into BGP
either way can't hurt, I guess.
Brian Carroll wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S! ALL!
The desired result is to allow only the default route to be sent to a
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 2:50 AM + 6/28/03, Hemingway wrote:
Is that Ernest, Margot, or Mariel?
which would yoiu prefer? :-
for those using some mix of 26xx routers in their study labs, one can now
get the enterprise basic IOS load, which
this kind of topic comes up regularly, and I gotta keep asking - why do you
think you need to block a service that employees are using?
OK, so the boss thinks employees are screwing around all day chatting with
their friends. so the answer is simple. remove internet access for everyone.
the boss
for those using some mix of 26xx routers in their study labs, one can now
get the enterprise basic IOS load, which includes such things as IS-IS,
BGP, MPLS, CEF, but none of the obsolte crap such as Apollo and Banyan
(still has DEC and DLSw, which I guess will never go away)
an interesting find
n rf wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Back in the days when baseball was understood to be the
ultimate expression
of American values, this may have been true. Take each
individual and weigh
his/her strengths and weaknesses, consider the overall value of
heir
contribution,
got your transmit and receive crossed? ( or rather, straight? )
Ron wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am working in a shop where we are migrating from 3Com to Cisco switches
and routers. I am having difficulty connecting Cisco and 3Com switches at
a
Gig. I am not sure what to look
Zsombor Papp wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:33 PM 6/24/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Aaron Ajello wrote:
This is probably a very simple concept question, but I've asked
a couple people and haven't gotten a solid answer.
If I've got two frame relay spoke
fracking top poster
here - you happy now? ;-
Larry Letterman wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Grump, grump, grump
If everyone would post the new text at the top, I'd be happy...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Evans, Timothy R (BearingPoint) wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good Morning!
Statement 1:
In general - businesses are not well known for being altruistic in their
hiring compensation practices.
Statement 2:
Any good manager would be rather foolish to not appreciate, and
Curious wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I know that is a bad idea to configure a port with portfast when this
port
connect with other switch (loops can be created), but the question is:
could
I put a port connected to a router in portfast mode? A router is a layer 3
device
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 6:50 PM + 6/22/03, annlee wrote:
It could also simply be poor phrasing -- CCIE is considered overqualified
for the job, or (possibly) too specialized. If that sounds bizarre, think
from another angle: maybe the job is not so
- jvd wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
802.1q is supported by Cisco on FastEthernet and GigabitEthernet, and not
on
Ethernet. Check out:
moving to a new computer, and can't locate the beginning of this thread.
sorry if this was covered previously.
the 2610 and 11 will support
31 matches
Mail list logo
