Access Lists [7:28927]

2001-12-12 Thread J. Johnson
We have a Cisco 5300 Dial-up. We want to allow everyone to get to our network when they dial in. We do not want everyone to get on the internet when they dial-in. This is what my access list look like access-list 110 permit ip 165.5.0.0 0.0.255.255 any access-list 110 deny ip any any Everyo

newbie: removing an ip route to loopback [7:62811]

2003-02-11 Thread J. Johnson
Please pardon my newbieness ... I have a router with this in the routing table: Router#show ip route 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 10.0.0.0 is directly connected, Loopback0 Router# I would like to remove it. However, the following (and several variations) do

2950 telnet access is lost after vlans [7:63789]

2003-02-25 Thread J. Johnson
I've lost some telnet access to my 2950 after implementing vlans. Before - Address 10.0.0.6 was available on vlan 1, which was the default vlan for all ports. telnet was possible into the switch from machines connected to any port. After - Created several vlans (5, 6, 7, and 8) and split the p

RE: 2950 telnet access is lost after vlans [7:63789]

2003-02-26 Thread J. Johnson
done via the uplink > you > will also need to do some trunking. Hope this helps. > > -Original Message- > From: J. Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 5:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 2950 telnet access is lost after v

RE: 2950 telnet access is lost after vlans [7:63789]

2003-02-27 Thread J. Johnson
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > The picture got a bit munged. I think I understand it, though. The > router-on-a stick is the Linux box and it's supposed to be on the right > side of the drawing? What do you mean by ix86? It's not a 486 machine is > it? Ugh. > :-) Sorry for the wraparound problem

RE: 2950 telnet access is lost after vlans [7:63789]

2003-02-27 Thread J. Johnson
J. Johnson wrote: > It looks like the switch is not forwarding the > packets to the router for some reason, even though it does forward packets > for other 10.0.0.X addresses. What I wrote above is not correct. (I was sniffing an unused port on the switch which I thought was proper

RE: 2950 telnet access is lost after vlans [7:63789]

2003-03-03 Thread J. Johnson
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > You gotta get it to stop doing that! ;-) Seriously, why doesn't the Linux > router-on-a-stick know that the destination is local, on VLAN 7? Shouldn't > it know not to send this packet to another router? It should just ARP for > the destination and send the packet

RE: 2950 telnet access is lost after vlans [7:63789]

2003-03-03 Thread J. Johnson
igned to it? J. Johnson wrote: > Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > >> >> You gotta get it to stop doing that! ;-) Seriously, why doesn't the Linux >> router-on-a-stick know that the destination is local, on VLAN 7? >> Shouldn't it know not to send this pa

default router for 2950 switch [7:64489]

2003-03-05 Thread J. Johnson
All, Is there a way to set a default router for a 2950 switch? Apparently other 2900 switches have the "set ip route default GATEWAYADDR" command (see http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat2900/cgcr29k/index.htm - thanks, Priscilla) but not, as far as I can tell, on the 2950 (

Re: default router for 2950 switch [7:64489]

2003-03-05 Thread J. Johnson
Thanks. That's exactly what I was looking for. Robert Edmonds wrote: > I believe the command you are looking for is "ip default-gateway . > Since the 2950 is an IOS based switch, the set commands don't apply here. > > > ""J. Johnson""

FTP Server [7:24525]

2001-10-29 Thread J. Johnson
I would like the remote users to be able to FTP data files to a folder on the Back-up Domain Controller NT Server 4.0. Do I put in the IP address of the NT server 4.0 under the access-list group? Can something like this works: access-list 110 permit ip any host 192.3.10.10 access-list 110 d

Re: FTP Server [7:24525]

2001-10-30 Thread J. Johnson
Thank you, Michael. I have another question. Can I use the same access list group number for another IP address? For example, I want to all the users to access 192.3.11.100 and only allow ftp for 192.3.10.10. access-list 110 permit ip any host 192.3.11.100 access-list 110 permit tcp any host 1

Re: FTP Server [7:24525]

2001-11-01 Thread J. Johnson
I have another question. Can I use the same access list group number for another IP address? For example, I want to all the users to access 192.3.11.100 and only allow ftp for 192.3.10.10. access-list 110 permit ip any host 192.3.11.100 access-list 110 permit tcp any host 192.3.10.10 eq ftp T

Re: FTP Server [7:24525]

2001-11-01 Thread J. Johnson
Thank you very much, Priscilla. Jill ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > From a book that I am working on. The figures would help, but you'll have > to buy the book for that! ;-) > > FTP Active Mode > 1 The client sends a TCP SYN to the well

Re: FTP Server [7:24525]

2001-11-01 Thread J. Johnson
Priscilla, So you used AFP instead of FTP.Do you mind sending the info on AFP such as vendor name, web site, phone number, etc.? Thanks. Jill ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanks for carrying it through. It's very helpful. > > A

is there a CDP log? [7:61471]

2003-01-21 Thread J. Johnson
Is there a CDP config option that will tell a cisco box to keep a log of CDP activity? If so, how would an administrator access it? It might be nice to see a history of when neighbors come up or go down, or when they change settings. James Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form