approaches.
Good Luck,
Darrell
John Mairs wrote:
Hi,
can I, if so, how would I go about setting up NPAT
on
my 2501's only ethernet port. I am confused as to
how
my router will be able to distinguish
inside/outside
NAT on the primary/secondary interfaces.
Essentially I would
Hi,
can I, if so, how would I go about setting up NPAT on
my 2501's only ethernet port. I am confused as to how
my router will be able to distinguish inside/outside
NAT on the primary/secondary interfaces.
Essentially I would like to now how to configure the
router to do this with a
Hi,
I have DSL with a static IP address/24. the gateway
address is x.x.x.254 and the static IP/24 address that
I have assigned the router is x.x.x.238. for fun I
assigned x.x.x.230 to my printer.
all addresses on the inside network are
192.168.0.x/24.
I can ping x.x.x.238 and x.x.x.230 but not
]
~~~
http://www.RouterChief.com
~~~
NEED A JOB ???
http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~
-Original Message-
From: John Mairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10
Hi,
I have a 2501 (one ethernet interface) and I wanted to
route over that interface by setting up two
sub-interfaces. I can't assign an address because it
replies with
configuring IP routing on a LLAN subinterface is only
allowed if that subinterface is already configured as
part of an IEEE
address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
HTH
Darren
At 03:10 PM 12/27/2001 -0500, John Mairs wrote:
Hi,
I have a 2501 (one ethernet interface) and I wanted
to
route over that interface by setting up two
sub-interfaces. I can't assign an address because
it
replies with
configuring IP
Maybe I am an Idiot (well, there is no doubt that I am
but still...)
If I remember right, when I was in Canada and driving
back into the United States it was the responsibility
of the Customs officers of the United States that were
responible for checking my apples and bananas (and
cemtex and
think any Canadian
wants that.
-- Leigh Anne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Mairs
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
Maybe I am an Idiot
I think that we cannot afford to let terrorists think
they have succeeded in destroying a monument that
represents the econonmic success of the United States.
I think it is imperative that we not only rebuild the
two 110 story towers using the exact same set of
blueprints. I think a grassroots
Hi John,
I think that is a very good point. Well I can only
say, cheer while you can it won't last long.
I was thinking that if enough people told enough
people all over New York and the world for that matter
we could do something unique.
I think that we cannot afford to let terrorists think
this new
architecture.
New Eastern Coastline will look like
.!..
.!..
.!..
.!..
-Original Message-
From: John Mairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sympathy expression [7:19542]
Hi John,
I think
--- Jim Dixon wrote:
and John LET US BUILD ALLL our new
buildings on the East COAST
using that NEW Architecture.
New East Coast will look like
.!..
.!..
.!..
.!..
.!..
.!..
-Original Message-
From: John Mairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Mairs
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
--- Jim Dixon wrote:
and John LET US BUILD ALLL our new
buildings on the East COAST
and access-lists
from hell ;)
- Original Message -
From: John Mairs
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
--- Jim Dixon wrote:
and John LET US BUILD ALLL our new
buildings on the East COAST
using that NEW
will look like
.!..
.!..
.!..
.!..
.!..
.!..
-Original Message-
From: John Mairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
I think that we cannot afford to let terrorists
think
they have
Here here! that was very poignant indeed and I for one
shall keep this email for ever. Top marks for Mr.
Sinclair.
thanks for sharing that...
--- Allen May wrote:
I like the Canadian viewpoint better than the one of
arrogance. Top marks for Mr. Sinclair.
TRIBUTE TO THE UNITED STATES
aaammen!
Allah be paved!
--- ed smith wrote:
Respectfully I would say,,, let people blow some
steam off! Who the hell
cares about CISCO right now?
Ed
From: Thad Gaston To: ed smith , Subject: RE:
'It's not the US
they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19679]
Date: Wed, 12
Hi all,
I have been taking a look at a couple of technologies
lately and I have run across MPLS and Transparent LAN
services. Are there any differences or similarities
and if so could someone expand on that.
thanks,
John L. Mairs
=
John L. Mairs
time.
John Mairs
=
John L. Mairs
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ
time.
John Mairs
=
John L. Mairs
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ
nge in any kind of sequence seems
astronomical.
Just some things that were bugging me... thanks.
John Mairs
=
John L. Mairs
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im
My understanding is that HSRP creates a "Phantom"
router with a Phantom IP address and a Phantom MAC
address (Internetworking Handbook). I'm ok with the IP
address, that is software. My confusion comes from it
being able to make up a MAC address arbitrarily
without stepping on any existing IEEE
22 matches
Mail list logo
