Re: Load Balancing and NAT [7:64904]

2003-03-12 Thread Me
this and I was wanting to know if anyone had any good pointers they could give me or any commands that I should beware of or add. Thanks, Terry O Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65247t=64904 -- FAQ, list archives

Re: List of ip protocols [7:62460]

2003-02-05 Thread Me
search for rfc1700 Symon Thurlow wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, Does anyone know of a reference list of ip protocols and their numbers For example gre = 47, tcp = 6? Etc Cheers, Symon Message Posted at:

New to vlans...HELP [7:59655]

2002-12-20 Thread Me Morpheus
. The switch is supposed to have 2 vlans, (A and B). I also have a server that is connected to this switch. The requirement that was told to me was that the port connected to the server must be a member of both VLANs and traffic sent from this port must be tagged (for both vlans). The port connected

PIX Exec-timeout [7:41382]

2002-04-13 Thread ME
How do you get the PIX to automatically log out the console if someone forgets to log out? The equivalent of exec-timeout in IOS? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41382t=41382 -- FAQ, list archives, and

Re: PIX Exec-timeout [7:41382]

2002-04-13 Thread ME
This works fine for telnets, but doesn't affect console connections. I would like to automatically timeout a console session after x minutes. scott jensen wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I apologize for previous incorrect information. (timeout conn) Try this

Re: CAT4003 and 3com [7:39084]

2002-03-21 Thread ME
3COM never auto-negotiates properly with Cisco, look for FCS errors on the switch ports. The best solution is to hardcode NICs to FD. The 'easiest' solution is to hardcode the switchports to HD. Mark Egan, CCIE #8775 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Greetings,

Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-04 Thread ME
Adding a second IP to the internal host is the only way I know of useing the PIX. Rich wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Why not add an additional ip to the internal host and have two nats? - Original Message - From: Gaz To: Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:06 PM Subject:

Re: insufficent memory on a new 1603R, Help!!!!! [7:37082]

2002-03-02 Thread ME
with the memory i have got though it seems to me that the router is loading something different. Im sure i must be missing something here and any help would be greatfully received. Regards Matt (UK) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37083t=37082

Re: PIX PAT Problem!! Urgent [7:37052]

2002-03-02 Thread ME
What he wants do do works fine. The static command works both ways.. Use the static to define to ip and the port. I use this myself. Leslie McIntosh wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ivan, This is a shot in the dark, but here is what I am seeing scanning through my PIX book:

Re: VPN Client 3.x to IOS VPN [7:36708]

2002-02-28 Thread ME
/ftunity.htm Kevin ME wrote: IOS just started to support the VPN Client 3.x (as apposed to the older secure client that only supports 95/NT) with ver 12.2.7T. I have not been able to find any information about it published on Cisco's public web site yet. Any idea who might be working

VPN Client 3.x to IOS VPN [7:36708]

2002-02-27 Thread ME
IOS just started to support the VPN Client 3.x (as apposed to the older secure client that only supports 95/NT) with ver 12.2.7T. I have not been able to find any information about it published on Cisco's public web site yet. Any idea who might be working on the bleeding edge of IOS VPNs that

Re: Current CD Rom Documentation [7:35930]

2002-02-20 Thread ME
Last week they had the latest and greatest Dec 2000 ROM at the lab ;) Chuck wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This post gives me a good excuse to break open the most recent doc CD that I have - dated October 2001. this one contains the 12.2 docum

Cisco Announces Global Rollout of New CCIE Security [7:35963]

2002-02-20 Thread ME
Has anyone heard about this one yet? Differing from CCIE Security, the Cisco Security Specialist 1 demonstrates an individual's proficiency in designing, installing, and supporting Cisco-specific security solutions in three core areas of network security: firewalls, intrusion detection systems

Re: Keeping Tunnel Up [7:35840]

2002-02-19 Thread ME
he Dial backup works fine with both backup interface and dialer watch-list, but the tunnenl which was source from the failed serial link would not come up even though all routes are being learned thru BRI interface and are in routing table. Can some please guide me what should i do... Thank you,

Re: Loading IOS on a 4000M [7:35689]

2002-02-17 Thread ME
nherited a 4000M that is blank (no IOS) and for the life of me I cannot figure out how to get the IOS loaded on it. The console port is a DB-25 and I do not have a working Ethernet card for it. I do have a couple np-4t cards though. Speaking of Ethernet cards for this model, I have a couple np-

OT: Network jobs in Dallas, TX? [7:35608]

2002-02-16 Thread ME
I'm new to the Dallas area and recently laid-off. I was wondering if folks here knew of anyone looking for somebody with 10 years network exp. and a CCIE in the Dallas area? If so please reply. Thanks, Mark Egan, CCIE #8775 Message Posted at:

Re: The proxy problem with pix 525? [7:35603]

2002-02-16 Thread ME
It's always a good idea to hard-code speed and duplex settings. interface ethernet0 auto interface ethernet1 auto interface ethernet2 auto cage wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... R--FW--DMZ | Inside | Proxy One proxy is connected to the inside switch

port needed open for dlsw (tcp encap) [7:34981]

2002-02-09 Thread ME
With dlsw, useing tcp encap, what tcp ports do I need open in an access-list to allow dlsw to work? TCP 2065 by itself is not enough. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34981t=34981 -- FAQ, list archives, and

DLSW access-list problem - more info [7:34985]

2002-02-09 Thread ME
I can see the the dlsw connection is useing tcp 2065, but seems to be another piece missing... (dlsw peer works fine without acces-list). Any help would be appreciated... I fly to SJ tomorow for the lab on Monday... Thanks! R0-R1#sh access-list 101 Extended IP access list 101 permit udp

Re: DLSW access-list problem - more info [7:34985]

2002-02-09 Thread ME
and 2067 for write CM - Original Message - From: ME To: Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 10:05 PM Subject: DLSW access-list problem - more info [7:34985] I can see the the dlsw connection is useing tcp 2065, but seems to be another piece missing... (dlsw peer works fine witho

transport input none [7:34996]

2002-02-09 Thread ME
Does anyone know the affect of entering 'transport input none' on the console line? Many of the IPExpert labs show it in their answer keys, but niether they, not Cisco really explains why. (That I can find.) Cisco shows it in many of their show run examples everywhere - with no explanation.

Re: transport input none [7:34996]

2002-02-09 Thread ME
That makes it sound like I would make the console port useable, but that it not what happens. I know that it will stop all traffic when applied to the async lines, but I don't see any effect on the console port or the aux port. somera cecilia wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL

Re: port needed open for dlsw (tcp encap) [7:34981]

2002-02-09 Thread ME
Security Training www.netcginc.com/training.htm ME wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... With dlsw, useing tcp encap, what tcp ports do I need open in an access-list to allow dlsw to work? TCP 2065 by itself is not enough. Message Posted at: http://ww

Re: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063]

2001-06-04 Thread Me
Actually it's for here or to go, Sir ;-) MIRSKY Carl wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I wish I had thought of it... :-) Anyway, can we PLEASE end this now? We ALL have our own opinions, and as is was stated several times, there is no one OS that can do it

Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6977]

2001-06-03 Thread Me
We never knew , cause it is the only instance I ever know of that a trainee has been kicked out of class for not meeting pre-requisite... Brian wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... training for a mouse, how does an admin like that make it through the day? Brian

Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:7020]

2001-06-03 Thread Me
Please don't waste anymore bandwidth until you're ready to stop hiding behind a shield of anonymity. Me wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You must be a GREAT GURU who couldn't even even figure out how the groupstudy news server works and how you have been ge

Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6936]

2001-06-02 Thread Me
UI is so that there will be work for pple like you ? One last thing.. could you send me some mail offline from this mailing list? You are listed as an anonymous poster and I would love to continue this conversation in a more private forum. In fact, let's don't even continue this conversation, public or

Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6937]

2001-06-02 Thread Me
Guess I have not read any CCNA books recently I won't even bother to flame you for the joke?? . When you find me a unix admin who can plan the deployment of 50,000 workstation and successfully roll it out, we can discuss again Michael L. Williams wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Boson vs. Colt ??????

2001-01-11 Thread Deal me In
I think that most of us are very capable of searching and using cracks and I have used them in the past when I feel a program is entirely over priced for no more than it does for me. In the case of the Boson exams they are well worth the $30 to me for all the hard work that is put into them. Some

Re: I need Boson Cisco Test Pack v3.22 demo for download !

2000-12-04 Thread Deal me In
D] wrote in message 90flq2$327$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:90flq2$327$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... A lot has been upgraded since 3.22. Let me guess, you can't find a crack for anything newer than version 3.22 ""Romeo"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 90fceq$df2$[EMAI

CPU utlization of a single voip cirtcuit

2000-11-09 Thread Yuen Me
Our company is planning to implement VoIP on top of existing cisco network and I'm conducting network audit. Can somebody advise me the resource consumption in term of CPU utilization / Buffer utilization across all platforms (26XX ... 75xx) for a single voip circuit ? My logic if my current

inverse arp

2000-08-28 Thread me
Is there a command to discover ip addresses learn from inverse arp. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations

RE: Transparent Briding over Frame Relay Hub and Spoke

2000-05-29 Thread Yuen Me
's neither a spanning tree issue. All ports in all bridges are in forwarding state. Appreciate if anyone can show me a working config (again spoke to spoke) with hub config other than point to point subinterface Yuenme From: "Ryan Moffett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Ryan Moffett&quo

RE: Transparent Briding over Frame Relay Hub and Spoke

2000-05-29 Thread Yuen Me
Serial0.204 point-to-point ip address 193.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast decnet cost 30 frame-relay interface-dlci 204 bridge-group 1 ! bridge 1 protocol ieee ! From: "Ryan Moffett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Yuen Me" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Transparent Brid

Transparent Briding over Frame Relay Hub and Spoke

2000-05-28 Thread Yuen Me
Hi all, I tend to conclude the following statement and pls confirm whether I'm right: "point to point" subinterface is the only option in the HUB to allow spoke to spoke packet forwarding happen in transparent bridging environment. I've tried physical interface and multipoint subinterface on