ay of last
> resort"
> Of the example i wrote abt how does one which route will be the gateway of
> last resort .
> Vijendra.
>
>
> "Michael R. Eckhoff" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>>All routes that mat
Depends on what type of Voice over IP you want to do. If you just want
to do an h323 gateway, you will need to have at least a 2600 with a VIC
module and various cards to go in it. FXO will go towards the CO on a
regular dialin line. You can then write some rules to allow something
like net
It's not dynamic. I can't ship that router out with the same config to
anyplace in the world. Using a default network, you can. It will come
up, peer, get it's routing table, and send it's default stuff towards
"home".
Let's say for instance that you have a large core network. You want all
All routes that match the default network will get tagged as default
candidates. As with most routing decisions, the best route wins and
gets set as the gateway of last resort. If that entry goes away, the
second one takes it place, and so forth, until you are out of default
candidates.
-me
The Key Fob version of the Secure ID stuff is a little token card that
goes on your keychain. The little strip of leather that's on your
keychain? It's a Fob. If it's not leather, it may take the shape of a
beer bottle opener.
-me
Art Barrera wrote:
> All,
>
> Working with Secure ID Servi
You can't do full on a hub. Put your routers back to half and it will
probably work. If not, make sure your workstations didn't auto-screwup
and go full as well.
Mike
Sammi wrote:
> I have the router interfaces on full/100, perhaps I'll move it to
> auto, same as the workstations are.
> I ha
How big is your enterprise? Lucent QIP is what I see most in large
enterprises. It has it's issues, but it's all around a very good product.
If you do go with something like QIP, it will provide DHCP, Dynamic DNS,
inventory (if you get that far into it), and a lot more.
Mike
Jnickys wrote:
I agree, unless it's doing this over and over and over and over again,
it's perfectly normal. Or, if you see an entire card drop and come back
- then you have a problem.
You'll usually see other errors in 'show mac' if there is a duplex
problem. Clear that ports stats and take a look at show
Not quite true.
TCP/IP CAN be done in silicon. However, it's not a good idea to do
this. The reason being is that if you have a bug in your stack, you
gotta toss the whole card.
These are called Layer 3 network cards, and are being used in some cases
to speed up some server stuff. Generall
No, that will just append nothing to the currently running config. No
different than copy tftp run.
Mike
Harrison, Michael wrote:
> I cannot test this yet (I will tonight) but I would try the following:
>
> Enter setup mode; escape from setup; save config. That should completely
> overwrite
Yes, DE bits will stay on as it traverses the frame network. With DE
set, any switch along the path that has congestion will toss you out
before one without DE set.
If you are running a CIR of 0 (as with most Sprint frame circuits), you
always run the risk of having to retransmit. However, t
I don't see anything extremely wrong here. Note that 51% of your CPU is
being spent in interrupts. Which means you're fast switching and
everything is going well.
There is obviously just a lot of traffic going on here that it has to
deal with. Now if it said something like 99%/1%, I would b
The binary method is nice because it is what the router does. In
addition, in the process, you get out a lot more information.
For instance, you can quickly determine the class without having to
memorize all of the ranges with the following binary patterns:
Class A: 0 [0-127]
Cla
i do not have enough fash or RAM to upgrade
> IOS and i'm suspecting a hardware failure so how can i know is it hardware
> failure or just software hangs
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Mohammed Saro
> Network Engineer
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "
Yeah - I've had a similar problem with a 3640 running 11.x code. Up it
to 12.0.18 if you can and it should go away. Mine has been rock solid
ever since.
Other things I noticed, besides the intermitant connectivity, would be
that the whole box would hang while you were on it for periods of ti
Interesting - I could just be butt-ass wrong then. It has been a while
since I've been on a network that utilized point-to-multipoint frame
relay - and never on the switch configuration side.
Let me look into it more.
Mike
Chuck Larrieu wrote:
> I'd sure like to see a working config for some
16 matches
Mail list logo
