there are 100 questions on the new r & s written...pass mark is 70 % &
fluctuates based on "statistics"
Timur Mirza
Principal Network Engineer
Enterprise Core Network
Verizon Wireless
15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, California 92618
949.286.6623 (o)
949.697.7964 (c)
Message Posted at:
http:
do you know what the pass mark is?
-Original Message-
From: Karsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question about the Revised R&S CCIE Written Exam [7:66715]
A ccie at Boson told me it was 120.
-Karsten
On Wednesday
so it went from 150 questions/3 hrs to 100 questions/2 hours on march 28th?
the cisco page does indicate the reduction from 3 to 2 hrs but no mention of
the # of questions
-Original Message-
From: Jvrg Buesink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PR
i'm scheduled for the written on 4/11 & i took the new one in november,
which was 3 hrs & 300 questions...so now it changed again, that's news to me
-Original Message-
From: Stepp Harless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New 2 ho
a hands-on lab training course for the ccie lab exam...i want to prepare
myself for my 6th attempt...i believe there was ecp course but i don't have
the details...thx in advance
Timur Mirza
Principal Network Engineer
Enterprise Core Network
Verizon Wireless
15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, Calif
CTED]
Subject: Re: is there anyone migrating isdn backup to dsl backup
[7:58568]
""Mirza, Timur"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> we are looking to migrate isdn backup at our retail stores to dsl...is
there
> anyone that has performed th
we are looking to migrate isdn backup at our retail stores to dsl...is there
anyone that has performed this already?
Timur Mirza
Principal Network Engineer
Network Planning & Engineering, West Region
15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, California 92618
Verizon Wireless
949.286.6623 (o)
949.697.7964
i can attest to that...i passed w/o a prob 3 yrs ago & failed on the new
written...its a night & day difference...when they lower the pass mark from
70% to 58%, it should make you think!
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2
btw, to add what "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" said, the bruno text is practically
irrelevant when it comes to the written
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ccie is a rip off! [7:58458]
Someo
does anyone have a good reference (e.g., white paper) on the nature of
bandwidth vs latency & the distinction bet/ the two?
Timur Mirza
Principal Network Engineer
Network Planning & Engineering, West Region
15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, California 92618
Verizon Wireless
949.286.6623 (o)
949.
anyone studying for the ccie written should not depend on the anthony bruno
text...it is totally irrelevant...i know from experience...are there any
other study guides out there for the new ccie written?
-Original Message-
From: Clark, John [mailto:John.Clark@;expanets.com]
Sent: Thursday,
btw, the bruno text is pretty irrelevant for some versions of the written
exam, esp. the one i took a couple of wks ago
-Original Message-
From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:shawn.kaminski@;eds.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCIE Routing $ Sw
i forgot to include the url, here it is:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/cert.html
-Original Message-
From: Mirza, Timur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mpls vis a vis the routing & switc
based on the url above, can i understand that after token, igrp & token over
dlsw will no longer be on the routing & switching exam after october, that
mpls will NOT become part of the routing & switching track, since it has
already been classified as part of the "communications & services" track?
one cisco doc says that the "callin" keyword is used on "incoming" or
"received" calls (which to me implies the CALLED router), while on another
it lists a config where it is configured on the CALLING router
actually, whatever side it's configured on, it works in my lab! still, i'm
trying to get
Timur Mirza
Principal Network Engineer
Network Planning & Engineering, West Region
15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, California 92618
Verizon Wireless
949.286.6623 (o)
949.697.7964 (c)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48319&t=48319
-
CISCO'S ANSWER:
---
>peer-on-demand defaults does not change what we learn from the peer during
CapEx. We have learned the default cost
>value from the remote, which is 3 - and that is what we show in 'sh dls
cap'. However, the value configured on peer-on-
>demand defaults (5) overr
i have the following config...r5 is the border peer & r8 & r4 are
clients...i configure a default cost of 5 on r5 but when i issue a "show
dlsw cap" on either client, the peer cost stays @ 3...is this a bug or
misconfig?
r5 (the border peer)
dlsw local-peer peer-id 100.100.5.5 group 100 border pr
> i don't have a 3920 t/r switch on me, so i have to ask this question:
>
> is it accurate to say that
>
> 1. the bridge id & ring # under the t/r interface on a router is in
> DECIMAL?
>
> 2. the bridge id & ring # under the t/r interface on a router is in HEX?
>
> therefore,
>
> if u wan
i don't have a 3920 t/r switch on me, so i have to ask this question:
is it accurate to say that
1. the bridge id & ring # under the t/r interface on a router is in DECIMAL?
2. the bridge id & ring # under the t/r interface on a router is in HEX?
therefore,
if u want to assign RING 100 to
two questions...thx in advance!
1. is the "source-bridge transparent" command required on the token ring
router when one dlsw peer is ethernet only & the other dlsw peer is token
ring only (i.e., bet/ r1-e1 & r2-to1)?
2. why is the virtual ring (500) required on the ethernet router in the
config
if u running any one of these three protocols over isdn for backup, is it
best to use a floating static or dialer-watch? is it pretty much limited to
these two methods (0ther than backup interface command in a non-vc
environment)
Timur Mirza
Principal Network Engineer
Network Planning & Engineeri
the config was compiled based on a DISCUSSION & a pdf, no testing 'cause i'm
looking for a cheap simulator!
-Original Message-
From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Mirza, Timur; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: is the follow
i don't have isdn in the lab (still looking for a simulator), so one more
validation question...is the following a viable callback cfg?:
!calling (client) & called router (server) negotiate w/ ppp lcp to determine
if client requests a callback or server will initiate a callback
!other bri comman
PAP Using Different Passwords On Two Different Routers
on r1:
username r2 password 0 timur
!
int BRI0
ppp authentication pap
ppp pap sent-username r1 password 0 milton
on r2:
username r1 password 0 milton
!
int BRI0
ppp authentication pap callin
ppp pap sent-username r2 password 0 timur
!"
Timur Mirza
Principal Network Engineer
Network Planning & Engineering, West Region
15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, California 92618
Verizon Wireless
949.286.6623 (o)
949.697.7964 (c)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42032&t=42032
-
Timur Mirza
Principal Network Engineer
Network Planning & Engineering, West Region
15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, California 92618
Verizon Wireless
949.286.6623 (o)
949.697.7964 (c)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42030&t=42030
-
i second & third that...ccie boot camps are a waste of time
-Original Message-
From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: What's it worth... [7:27400]
DOWN WITH BOOT CAMPS :>
-Original Message-
F
> hi heather,
>
> we are grappling w/ an issue regarding the 6509s that will comprise the
> interwan... > is not entirely clear on the
> following issue:
>
> are the msfcs operationally independent OR can one msfc backup the other
> msfc? our requirement is that our dual supervisor 6509 has ONE
do u have to recertify on the written after 3 yrs? i passed the written in
1/2000 & since then, i've attempted the lab 4x...i'm going to attempt the
lab as many times as i can before the written recertification (in 1/2003),
after that, sad to say but i'm planning to give up...it just ain't worth i
to the host? is there something wrong w/my acl?
telnet client -> 151.144.210.29
telnet host -> 192.168.1.254 (this is the debugging router)
access-list 100 permit tcp host 151.144.210.29 host 192.168.1.254
access-list 100 permit tcp host 192.168.1.254 host 151.144.210.29
!
r6_t/s@timur's#sh acc
* if u r doing nat outside to inside, is it normal behavior to get two
different nat addresses for the same source (in this case, 10.14.13.136)? i
know its going to 2 different destinations but shouldn't the source get the
same address?
ohdblndxnet-dr>sh ip nat tr ve
Pro Inside global
32 matches
Mail list logo
