source?
""Tauseef Nagi"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> Latest information coming out of Cisco regarding CCIE R&S lab is that
Cisco
> will be adding more (complex) switching material to the lab scenarios.
This
> will include two switches with routing engines, trunking b
I have heard rumors of this, but no confirmation. I have a week to go and
sure would like to know if this is something I need to worry about.
""Tauseef Nagi"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Cisco's europe office in Brussel
Took the lab Tuesday in San Jose. Missed by a just a couple of points on
some really stupid mistakes. The time factor is a killer on this exam. Let
me clarify that statement--you have plenty of time to do what is asked of
you, the real problem is that you can't hesitate anywhere. You have to b
Thanks for the support guys. If nothing else, it has must made me mad and
more determined. As soon as I can get some sleep, I'm going to double up my
study efforts from before. At this point, just passing is not going to
satisfy me--anything less than a 95 is unacceptable. I want to beat it
wo
do a 'write me' every time you leave a router. if you are having problems,
sometimes it doesn't hurt to reload either.
""Hire, Ejay"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> no ip domain-lookup (how do you spell pnig again)
> terminal escape-char 3 (Press Ctrl-c to bre
At what point during redistribution is a route-map processed? In other
words, if I want to redistribute from EIGRP (supports tags) to IGRP (doesn't
support tags) can I match tags in the route map and then let those routes go
into IGRP?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.ph
pen in the various processes on a router. for example, linear
> redistribute seems not to occur at all, even if that does not seem
logical.
> ( can't redistribute from rip to igrp to ospf an the same router, not and
> get anything coherent or predictable as a result ) however, in th
don't redistribute
> >
> > in this case, only those routes with a tag of X learned from eigrp 50
will
> > be redistributed into igrp ( subject to the classfulness of the route )
> >
> > sometimes it can be a little difficult to determine where exactly things
> > happen
First of all, BGP has no "split horizon" rule. IBGP neighbors will not
propagate routes to each other as a matter of loop protection (since we have
no way to add AS numbers w/in the AS--don't worry about confederations yet).
This really has nothing to do w/split horizon. Try this:
R1R2---R3
not
> in this topology. maybe if the topology were a ring or a circle, and there
> are two points of mutual redistribution? Slattery's book has an
interesting
> exercise along that line, and I'm not sure I ever got the filters tweaked
> right in that one.
>
> Chuck
>
>
Source and destination of the tunnel should be loopback interfaces. The
tunnel will most likely bounce when the primary fails, but should recover
when the new routes are discovered.
""Aamer Kaleem"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I cannot keep an ip tunnel up wh
try www.ccbootcamp.com. I have rented time from them and had no problems.
Their racks have everything you need.
""Emilio"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Everyone,
> I'm triying to practice more to CCIE Lab.
>
> I want to rent some remote Lab to practice.
>
>
You gotta love this one. Real pain in the *ss to get back in.
""Chuck"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> and if you want to have a ton of fun, set it to something like 0 1 ;->
>
>
> ""Thom Castognalia"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should be "snapshot routing can be used only with distance vector protocols,
such as IGRP and RIP."
""Rajesh Kumar"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> I am quoting here the second paragraph on Pg 518 of CCIE practical
> studies book
>
>
> "Because link-s
Always know multiple ways to do things. Priority overrides RID.
""cclark"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In determining DR and BDR, OSPF will use the priority and the Router ID. I
> can change the Router ID by creating a loopback with a higher ID (IP
address
>
Map the local DLCI to the local IP address. Router doesn't know how to get
there.
""Karl Brusen"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I was working with FR in my home lab, and I ran into an interesting
> problem. This is the first time I've set up a router to functi
You could prepend AS numbers to the path going out to Carrier A and set
local preference in IBGP to prefer the routes to Carrier B. This would
force all incoming and outgoing traffic to Carrier B until an outage.
""Alfredo Pulido"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> Hello,
>
> (English
Anybody know where to find info. on services and other dark crevices of the
IOS on the Doc CD?
Thanks,
Scott
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37402&t=37402
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.
Not that bad. A bunch of dates open in March and April in San Jose--if you
can't do that, you are screwed until August. The one thing that I have
noticed is that when people get within their 28 day window, they drop their
date. This opens up dates for the more serious contenders.
Best of luck!
ROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> >Steven A. Ridder
> >Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:44 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: CCIE program will be dropping token ring! [7:37422]
> >
> >
> >I'm in a meeting with the CCIE program manager and they will be r
Unplug one of the cables.
""Jerry P."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all:
>
> I have a question about a RIP lab exercise that I am developing for school
> that I was wondering if I could ask you about. I have three routers each
> connected through ethernet l
Don't clear the route table either. That defeats the purpose.
""Scott H."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Unplug one of the cables.
>
> ""Jerry P."" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"&g
Shutting down the interface will work. However, clearing the route table
tells the route process to start over. If it starts over, it has no idea
that the route ever existed. Shut down the interface and wait for the
timers to expire.
For example:
R1-R2-R3
Shut down the interface at R
I set this up really quick and had it working. Here is my setup:
R1R2
R1 has a loopback w/ address 10.1.1.1 and is using the serial to get to R2.
After the connection was up and working, I shut down the loopback on R1 and
immediately got the following (due to the triggered update as Priscil
the network number, i.e. show ip route
> 10.0.0.0.
>
> What version of RIP are you using? What version of IOS?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Priscilla
>
> At 06:56 PM 3/6/02, Scott H. wrote:
> >I set this up really quick and had it working. Here is my setup:
> >
> >
ggest that he puts a loopback on R1 to use as the test subnet as in theory
he can still reach the ethernet segment between R1 and R2 even if R1 is
shutdown.
HTH,
Scott
""Scott H."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> When it is listed as &q
Also, make sure you are looking at the debug at R3. R1 won't show this same
info..
""Scott H."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Here is the debug:
>
> 00:04:10: RT: metric change to 10.0.0.0 via 192.1.1.1, rip metric [12
Yes. BGP needs to know how to get to that neighbor and since they are not
directly connected or running a common IGP, you need a static route.
""Stanzin Takpa"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In the following cisco configuration , Is the static route necessary,
isable synchronization, will it work fine?
> Scott H. wrote:
> >
> > Yes. BGP needs to know how to get to that neighbor and since
> > they are not
> > directly connected or running a common IGP, you need a static
> > route.
> >
> > ""Stanzin T
I never use the full commands anymore. Takes too much time. You will find
when you get to the CCIE level that you don't have time for it and for the
most part forget the entire commands. You just remember the abbreviated
ones.
""Andy Barkl"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROT
Crawl back into that hole you came out of. Nobody wants to listen to your
B.S.
""Jim Bond"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Sorry for wasting your bandwidth, but I have to say
> this.
>
> Being rich is good; being smart is good. But if you
> treat others like sxx
The telco. denying responsibility for something--the hell you say!
Never heard of it before.
""Steve Smith"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone explain the term embryonic connections? I have a box that has
> increasing dropped embryonic connections which
The only time the SC0 interface comes into play is for telnet into the box.
If you have any 100 MB ports on your switch, you can run trunking.
set trunk (mod/port) on isl
If this trunk is running into a router, you need to create the subinterfaces
on the router to enable routing between VLANS.
Does anybody know the command to use on an interface to see bridge numbers
in hex instead of decimal?
Thanks,
Scott
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39997&t=39997
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: htt
Smaller routers couldn't handle all these routes. Can anybody say "mushroom
cloud"?
""Lomker, Michael"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Why is redistribution into an IGP a big no - no? My
> > understanding is that this is what people usually do.
>
> You'd have
The first command will advertise the entire block. If you have other
interfaces in that block, they will be included. The second command says to
just advertise that interface.
HTH,
Scott
""Ruihai An"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> When I do a CCIE lab from CC
2 2501s w/12.1 and 16/8 in good working condition. Console and DTE/DCE
include. $850 obo.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42834&t=42834
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.g
Define an acl on each spoke with all of the remote networks ie:
access-list 100 permit any (ip of remote network)
Do this for each of the remote networks. Then define a route map matching
on that access list and set the next hop to the ip of the hub router. Apply
to the outgoing serial interfa
Selling 2 2501s w/ IOS 12.1 16/8 and 1 DTE/DCE cable. $600 including
shipping COD anywhere in the lower 48.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44121&t=44121
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
Removing the route map and as-path filters will work the way you have it (if
you do "no route-map MyISP-In" it will remove the entire route-map), but you
should also remove the neighbor statements in your config. that reference
these things. By looking at the configs., I'm assuming this is in a l
twork. Since I am not even a
> CCNA yet (maybe in a couple of weeks), I wanted to make sure I would not
> break something. I just substituted names and AS numbers. I am hopefully
> going to take advanced routing and learn more about the BGP soon after my
> test.
>
> Thanx,
> Ani
Why does it always have to be a contest of who's is biggest? If this guy
thinks he can pass the lab then by all means take the class and give the lab
a shot. I'm sure Cisco would be happy to collect the money from him each
time he takes it. I guess what I'm trying to say here is take care of yo
tart hearing enough of this kind of talk, then perception
> of the cert will inevitably start to change in a negative way. That, my
> friend, is the connection. It is an unfortunate reality of life that we
are
> judged based on the actions of our community. Call it
guilt-by-association,
ren't somebody you would want to work for anyway,
> but your principles don't exactly help you very much in paying the rent.
>
>
> ""Scott H."" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > If the HR people (or hiri
I recently completed the CCIE lab exam (R&S) and have been contemplating the
next mountain. Anybody have any suggestions? I have considered both
Juniper and Nortel but my interest level in those is limited and so is my
access to equipment. Anybody gone down the road of CCIP yet? Metro seems
li
Any recommendations for good sources on MPLS?
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 8:58 PM -0400 5/27/02, Scott H. wrote:
> >I recently completed the CCIE lab exam (R&S) and have been contemplatin
That's the right CD, but a little out dated. You can use the most current
info. right of CCO by going to "technical documentation". The search
function is horrible so I would suggest learning exactly where things are.
HTH,
Scott
CCIE #9340
""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news
Whenever you are using the rif end to end.
""Nijhawan Akshay"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone know in what scenarios you need to configure 'multiring all'
on
> a token ring interface connected to the Cat 3900?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupst
Both sides send DDPs. The "more" bit is used in the exchange for each side
to inform the other if it has more information to send. See Doyle VOL. 1
for a good description of this process.
HTH,
Scott
CCIE #9340
""thinkworker"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In
49 matches
Mail list logo
