Re: rate-limit question [7:58423]

2002-12-03 Thread pauldongso
Willia, By default, CAR is disabled. If you want to enable CAR, you are not allowed to complete the command without exceed-action explicitly defined. So your question is not valid in some ways. Regards, Paul William Lijewski wrote: > For rate-limit, is there a default "exceed-action" ? I hav

NAT over virtual template [7:58521]

2002-12-03 Thread pauldongso
Hi, Is it valid to configure virtual template as the NAT inside source? Thanks Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58521&t=58521 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco

Re: Spanning tree loop [7:58099]

2002-11-27 Thread pauldongso
Thanks for everyone the response. This scenario was seen in production network. Switch A is managed by us, Switch B is managed by client. We don't have visibility of switch B and the client has very little knownlodge of their own gears. Switch B is HP 2524, according to cdp discovery. Switch

Spanning tree loop [7:58099]

2002-11-26 Thread pauldongso
Hi All, Please advise how STP participates in the following scenario and why STP fails to stop the loop? |switch A | - |(vlan 7)| (vlan 8) || || |(vlan 1)|(vlan 1) --- | switch

ICMP unreachable source address [7:58014]

2002-11-24 Thread pauldongso
Hi All, when cisco router generates icmp unreachable packet, what interface would will used as the source or icmp unreachable packet sent back to the rquestor? Would it be the loopback? outgoing interface or something else? Thanks Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/rea

Re: vlan name vs vlan number [7:57985]

2002-11-24 Thread pauldongso
Road wrote: > ""pauldongso"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >>Hi All, >> >>come across this scenario: >> >>Switch A -

vlan name vs vlan number [7:57985]

2002-11-24 Thread pauldongso
Hi All, come across this scenario: Switch A - switch B (vtp wally) trunk (vtp world) | | | | PC 1 PC 2 (vlan 2,name access) (vlan 2, name access) ip 10.0.0.1

CCIE lab equipment for sale ( for Australian resid [7:57589]

2002-11-18 Thread pauldongso
Hi All, A friend is selling his lab equipment after he passed his lab exame last week. A full list is as below: 5 Router Lab for sale. All routers are in perfect working order and equipped with 16F/16D memory. The following items are included: 1 x Cisco 2503 - 1 Ethernet - 1 BRI - 2 Serial -

question for lab [7:57642]

2002-11-18 Thread pauldongso
Hi all, wondering if there is a special mailing list for lab equipment sale in groupstudy? I don't want to break the rules but did not see any polciy stating no equipment sale messages can be posted under this mailing list? Please shed a light if you can. I am just helping a friend to sell his

spanning tree questions [7:57578]

2002-11-17 Thread pauldongso
Hi all, I have a few questions in regards to spanning tree: 1. during the root port election, if there are multiple ports having the same root path cost, what would be the rest election criterias? Would it be the same as designated port? 2. In CAT5500 with dual supervisor, which mac address wi

trunking over ethernet [7:57539]

2002-11-15 Thread pauldongso
Does ethernet interface support trunking? (isl and dot1.q, or just one of those)? The reason for asking is all the doco i ever read only say "cisco supports trunking on both fast ethernet and gigabit ethernet switch links, as well as aggregated fast ang gigabit etherchannel links" Sounds like

ccnp switching - capus network design [7:57534]

2002-11-15 Thread pauldongso
Hi All, Am reading ccnp switching exam guide (cisco press), I am very confused by the design example provided in the book. A provided design of typical switch block: L2 S1 L2 S2 (Layer2 switching) | \ / | | \ / | |\ /| | \ / | | /\

OSPF point-to-multipoint network type [7:57149]

2002-11-08 Thread pauldongso
Hi, Jeff Doyle says in one session: "in point-to-multipoint network, netwokrs are seen as point-to-point links, the ospf packets are multicast" in another session, he says: "On NBMA, point-to-multipoint, and virtual link network types, Hellos are unicast to individual neighbors" So what is ac

out-of-band management via console port [7:57026]

2002-11-06 Thread pauldongso
Hi All, Am looking to setup out of band connection via console (not aux for some reason). The modem answers call fine but just has no access to the console(cabling is fine too). Please advise what is wrong with the config: line con 0 login passwd transport preferred lat pad v120 lapb

Re: Problem with polling interface counters Cisco 7206vxr [7:56989]

2002-11-06 Thread pauldongso
I am afraid you are hitting a bug. outgoing counters stop working for all interfaces. mrtg affected as well. This was seen in 12.0(21)S4 You may want to open a TAC case with cisco. Paul Daniel Kekai wrote: > Hello > > I am using 12.0(21)S4 on a Cisco 7206vxr with FE,T1 and DS3/ATM modules. I >

RIPv2 compatibility with RIPv1 [7:56876]

2002-11-04 Thread pauldongso
Hi all, In Jeff's routing tcp/ip RIPv2 session, case study "compatibilty with RIPv1" brings me this question: Why ethernet 1 only has "ip rip send version 1 2" configured but not "ip rip receive version 1 2"? By default version 2 is enabled. Is it because the example assumes host Pojoaque is

Re: RIP neighboure command question [7:56588]

2002-10-31 Thread pauldongso
100.0.0.0/8 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0 > > conclusion - even with the neighbor statement in place, RIP will not send > updates out the interface if that interface address is not part of the rip > process. > > any takers? > > Chuck > >

RIP neighboure command question [7:56588]

2002-10-31 Thread pauldongso
Hi All, Am doing the written study. In Jeff routing tcp/ip book, under RIP configruation exercise session, there is a question: - RTC -RTD - (192.168.2.1/24) (192.168.3.1/24) (192.168.3.2/24) (192.168.4.1/24) The question is to only use unic