Willia,
By default, CAR is disabled. If you want to enable CAR, you are not
allowed to complete the command without exceed-action explicitly defined.
So your question is not valid in some ways.
Regards,
Paul
William Lijewski wrote:
> For rate-limit, is there a default "exceed-action" ? I hav
Hi,
Is it valid to configure virtual template as the NAT inside source?
Thanks
Paul
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58521&t=58521
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco
Thanks for everyone the response.
This scenario was seen in production network.
Switch A is managed by us, Switch B is managed by client.
We don't have visibility of switch B and the client has very little
knownlodge of their own gears.
Switch B is HP 2524, according to cdp discovery.
Switch
Hi All,
Please advise how STP participates in the following scenario and why STP
fails to stop the loop?
|switch A |
-
|(vlan 7)| (vlan 8)
||
||
|(vlan 1)|(vlan 1)
---
| switch
Hi All,
when cisco router generates icmp unreachable packet, what interface
would will used as the source or icmp unreachable packet sent back to
the rquestor? Would it be the loopback? outgoing interface or something
else?
Thanks
Paul
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/rea
Road wrote:
> ""pauldongso"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>come across this scenario:
>>
>>Switch A -
Hi All,
come across this scenario:
Switch A - switch B
(vtp wally) trunk (vtp world)
| |
| |
PC 1 PC 2
(vlan 2,name access) (vlan 2, name access)
ip 10.0.0.1
Hi All,
A friend is selling his lab equipment after he passed his lab exame last
week.
A full list is as below:
5 Router Lab for sale. All routers are in perfect working order and
equipped with 16F/16D
memory. The following items are included:
1 x Cisco 2503 - 1 Ethernet - 1 BRI - 2 Serial -
Hi all,
wondering if there is a special mailing list for lab equipment sale in
groupstudy?
I don't want to break the rules but did not see any polciy stating no
equipment sale messages can be posted under this mailing list?
Please shed a light if you can. I am just helping a friend to sell his
Hi all,
I have a few questions in regards to spanning tree:
1. during the root port election, if there are multiple ports having the
same root path cost, what would be the rest election criterias? Would it
be the same as designated port?
2. In CAT5500 with dual supervisor, which mac address wi
Does ethernet interface support trunking? (isl and dot1.q, or just one
of those)?
The reason for asking is all the doco i ever read only say "cisco
supports trunking on both fast ethernet and gigabit ethernet switch
links, as well as aggregated fast ang gigabit etherchannel links"
Sounds like
Hi All,
Am reading ccnp switching exam guide (cisco press), I am very confused
by the design example provided in the book.
A provided design of typical switch block:
L2 S1 L2 S2 (Layer2 switching)
| \ / |
| \ / |
|\ /|
| \ / |
| /\
Hi,
Jeff Doyle says in one session:
"in point-to-multipoint network, netwokrs are seen as point-to-point
links, the ospf packets are multicast"
in another session, he says:
"On NBMA, point-to-multipoint, and virtual link network types, Hellos
are unicast to individual neighbors"
So what is ac
Hi All,
Am looking to setup out of band connection via console (not aux for some
reason). The modem answers call fine but just has no access to the
console(cabling is fine too). Please advise what is wrong with the config:
line con 0
login
passwd
transport preferred lat pad v120 lapb
I am afraid you are hitting a bug. outgoing counters stop working for
all interfaces. mrtg affected as well. This was seen in 12.0(21)S4
You may want to open a TAC case with cisco.
Paul
Daniel Kekai wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am using 12.0(21)S4 on a Cisco 7206vxr with FE,T1 and DS3/ATM modules. I
>
Hi all,
In Jeff's routing tcp/ip RIPv2 session, case study "compatibilty with
RIPv1" brings me this question:
Why ethernet 1 only has "ip rip send version 1 2" configured but not "ip
rip receive version 1 2"? By default version 2 is enabled. Is it because
the example assumes host Pojoaque is
100.0.0.0/8 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> conclusion - even with the neighbor statement in place, RIP will not send
> updates out the interface if that interface address is not part of the rip
> process.
>
> any takers?
>
> Chuck
>
>
Hi All,
Am doing the written study.
In Jeff routing tcp/ip book, under RIP configruation exercise session,
there is a question:
- RTC -RTD -
(192.168.2.1/24) (192.168.3.1/24) (192.168.3.2/24) (192.168.4.1/24)
The question is to only use unic
18 matches
Mail list logo