Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482]

2003-03-08 Thread Thomas Crowe
, March 05, 2003 5:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482] To all, I know this subject has been talked about on a workstation level but I want to ask it on a network level. We recently replaced our Nortel network with Cisco switches and we seem to have a slowness level

Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482]

2003-03-08 Thread John Hutchison
Ron Beasley wrote: YOU NEED TO TELL SISCO TO GET YOUR ASS OFF MY EMAIL LIST NOW1 Gee...I really hope that maybe Ron has some friends that got ahold of his computer and played a bad prank. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64846t=64482

RE: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482]

2003-03-06 Thread Peri Sophos
Message- From: Mike Momb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 5:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482] To all, I know this subject has been talked about on a workstation level but I want to ask it on a network level. We recently replaced our Nortel

RE: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482]

2003-03-06 Thread Peri Sophos
Sorry forgot to mention , cat3 cable wont go well with 100mb full duplex and is not a very good cable :) -Original Message- From: M.C. van den Bovenkamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 5:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482

RE: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482]

2003-03-06 Thread Ron Beasley
happens when the drives for the cards are not of the latest. Thanks -Original Message- From: Mike Momb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 5:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482] To all, I know this subject has been talked about

RE: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482]

2003-03-06 Thread Peri Sophos
this and NOT like you did. Thanks -Original Message- From: Ron Beasley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:16 PM To: Peri Sophos; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482] YOU NEED TO TELL SISCO TO GET YOUR ASS OFF MY EMAIL LIST NOW1 Peri Sophos

10 half or 100 full [7:64482]

2003-03-05 Thread Mike Momb
To all, I know this subject has been talked about on a workstation level but I want to ask it on a network level. We recently replaced our Nortel network with Cisco switches and we seem to have a slowness level across the network at certain times. We have a raging debate on what speed to set

Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482]

2003-03-05 Thread M.C. van den Bovenkamp
Mike Momb wrote: very well. My question is this, what has been this groups experience on how to set the ports for the maximum bandwith. We are using a combination of Cat 5 Cat 3 cables. Any advice would be appreciated. CAT3? Ouch. If you can't be *very* sure which cable run is what (CAT3

RE: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482]

2003-03-05 Thread Michael Williams
Well, first off, don't expect 100Mbps out of Cat 3. Here's the scoop with speed/duplex settings: If both ends are on auto, they will negociate the best setting that they (as a couple) are capable of. So if you connect a 10/100 NIC to a 10/100 switchport and both are on auto, you will get

RE: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482]

2003-03-05 Thread Joseph R. Taylor
Hi Mike, What I'd recommend is to go to all Cat 5 ASAP. In the meantime set either 10full or 100full depending on the cable and NIC type. It is always better that Auto. JoeT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64491t=64482

Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482]

2003-03-05 Thread Scott Roberts
yes cat3 can be used for 100base, but only wih 100baseT4 and chances are that the cards in your workstations are only TX. so its safer to run 10base over cat3 cabling. scott Mike Momb wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To all, I know this subject has been talked about on a workstation

RE: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482]

2003-03-05 Thread Charles D Hammonds
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of M.C. van den Bovenkamp Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 7:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482] Mike Momb wrote: very well. My question is this, what has been this groups experience on how to set the ports for the maximum