We do it all over in our LSS service, (LAN Switching Service). Though
we no longer use 4700's, dead product, it works fine and these things
were bridging. Only time we had a very strange problem that has never
been resolved was a customer connect about 6 sites thru this fully
meshed service with
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Circusnuts
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 45 & 4700's, FE, & ATM [7:26788]
I found on the CCO where it is not recommended not to run FE and ATM modules
on the same
>
Hmmm- this feels like a Life cereal commercial :o)
I'll go with the closest to the power supply and let you know what happens.
Phil
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Cotts"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:06 PM
Subject: RE: 45 & 4700's, FE, &
h one. I'll guess at the one
closest to the power supply.
Let us know the outcome.
> -Original Message-
> From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 45 & 4700's, FE, & ATM [7:26788]
I found on the CCO where it is not recommended not to run FE and ATM modules
on the same 45 or 4700 router. I have a 4500 and 4500M, both running NP-4Ts,
NP-1FE, and NP-1R & NP-2R modules. Has anyone had experience with running
ATM
and FE on the same router ??? Cisco says it's a big no-go, but
5 matches
Mail list logo
