Re: A message from the CCIE Program [7:13789]

2001-07-28 Thread Gareth Hinton
What a good idea. Maybe Cisco should search the archives for the negative posts and allow them a free go at the new lab. Bravo to the existing CCIE's who would have a pop at it, for nothing other than the good and benefit of the CCIE program. Is there any truth in the rumour that

Re: A message from the CCIE Program [7:13789]

2001-07-26 Thread Anand Ghody
Since I can't add an attachment I copy and pasted Caslow's response as presented to me when I e-mailed Lorne at Cisco regarding my concerns and Cisco's motivations for changing the lab format. Date: July 10, 2001 To: Lorne Braddock, Cisco Systems From: Bruce Caslow, Mentor Technologies

Re: A message from the CCIE Program [7:13789]

2001-07-26 Thread Anand Ghody
below is what I believe the source of this thread is about. It looks like some else had also e-mailed Lorne, except Lorne sent him two reports instead of just the one from Caslow as was done for me. Below is Mr. Remakers remarks. Mr. Phil Remaker is one of the first people to achieve CCIE

A message from the CCIE Program [7:13789]

2001-07-25 Thread Enid Sorkowitz
I am posting this per Lorne Braddock's request. Please don't directly respond back to me or Lorne because we simply can't reply to everyone and don't want to appear disrespectful. Regards, Enid Sorkowitz Manager, Customer Service CCIE Program

Re: A message from the CCIE Program [7:13789]

2001-07-25 Thread Guy Russell
these records are? He said make them public... - Original Message - From: Enid Sorkowitz To: Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 1:21 PM Subject: A message from the CCIE Program [7:13789] I am posting this per Lorne Braddock's request. Please don't directly respond back to me or Lorne because

Re: A message from the CCIE Program [7:13789]

2001-07-25 Thread Jonathan Hays
Thanks Enid. And thank Lorne for us. It is unfortunately rare that I read a post on this forum that is so well articulated, polite, and sensible as yours is. Thanks again, Jonathan Hays Enid Sorkowitz wrote: I am posting this per Lorne Braddock's request. Please don't directly respond