A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668]

2001-08-21 Thread Chuck Larrieu
As a result of an off-list conversation, I came across the following networking term: iBGP split horizon my first reaction was a sarcastic remark about never having come across the term in the RFC's. but then I got to thinking about it, and I now see this as a descriptive and quite useful term.

RE: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668]

2001-08-21 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
9 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668] As a result of an off-list conversation, I came across the following networking term: iBGP split horizon my first reaction was a sarcastic remark about never having come across the term in the RFC's. but th

Re: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668]

2001-08-21 Thread Brian
Interesting, But traditional split-horizon seems to be concerned with the "interface" the routes came in and went out on, whereas with iBGP the routes are not passed even if they come in one interface, but are being sent out another, Its more of a peer level than an interface level. Brian On Tu

Re: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668]

2001-08-21 Thread John Neiberger
I've actually heard that term used before, and I think it *may* have been in one of Howard's books or CertificationZone papers. Maybe not, I'm sure he'll correct me. I do know that I've heard the term "split horizon" in this context before. I agree that we should probably use it more often.

RE: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668]

2001-08-21 Thread Chuck Larrieu
about wording things ;-> -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ole Drews Jensen Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668] Chuck, I think there's a difference here. Spl

RE: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668]

2001-08-21 Thread Chuck Larrieu
I'm told that the term appears in the Cisco BSCN course material. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:

Re: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668]

2001-08-21 Thread Tony Medeiros
ginal Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:13 PM Subject: RE: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668] > I thought I was fairly careful in stating that with iBGP split-horizon, an > iBGP router will not advertise a route to the same AS from which

RE: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668]

2001-08-21 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:57 PM To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668] I thought I was fairly careful in stating that with iBGP split-horizon, an iBGP router will not advertise a route to the same AS from which it receives the route. This

Re: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668]

2001-08-22 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
;-) >Tony M. >(Split personnality) > >- Original Message - >From: "Chuck Larrieu" >To: >Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:13 PM >Subject: RE: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668] > > > > I thought I was fairly careful in stating that with iBG

Re: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668]

2001-08-22 Thread Donald B Johnson jr
e. This is after a booming failure. So that is a new networking/list term. Palm-Pilot English. And the coin is yours. Don P.S. That busted me up!! - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:29 AM Subject: Re: A new networking term