workaround is always to load configs from TFTP. Do check that you
> aren't short on NVRAM.
>
> This doesn't sound quite the same as your problem, though.
>
>
>>>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>>>>
>>1/28/03 9:37:22 AM >>
e same as your problem, though.
>
>
>>>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>>>>
>>1/28/03 9:37:22 AM >>>
>>The router is a 3640.
>>
>>I'm using the following image: c3640-ik9o3s-mz.122-11T
>>
>>-Original Message-
router is a 3640.
>
>I'm using the following image: c3640-ik9o3s-mz.122-11T
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:27 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: ACL memory space [7:
"
1/28/03 9:37:22 AM >>>
The router is a 3640.
I'm using the following image: c3640-ik9o3s-mz.122-11T
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ACL memo
The router is a 3640.
I'm using the following image: c3640-ik9o3s-mz.122-11T
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ACL memory space [7:62028]
What route
What router and image is this happening on?
John
>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
1/28/03 8:47:57 AM >>>
Is there a way to devote separate memory space for ACLs?
I just opened a TAC case; but I'm still having problems with my lists
getting dropped, I've even went so far as to delete all the entries
and
Is there a way to devote separate memory space for ACLs?
I just opened a TAC case; but I'm still having problems with my lists
getting dropped, I've even went so far as to delete all the entries and
reenter only a couple.
Scenario: I shell into the router, add one additional host to access-list
7 matches
Mail list logo