Hey Group,
I am studying for my BSCN and am starting on my journey into BGP
(luckily I left a trail of bread crumbs to get out) ;) What I'm saying is
that for the next couple weeks you may see me asking more than the usual
amount of questions.
I have one on the BGP Route D
2 devices shouldn't have the same loopback ip. The loopback ip is
typically used as an ip to peer with and is not associated with a specific
interface. That is the reason it is used. I have only seen the decision
process get to that point once, and the details of the situation I don't
remember,
In a message dated 10/12/00 1:32:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 2 devices shouldn't have the same loopback ip. The loopback ip is
> typically used as an ip to peer with and is not associated with a specific
> interface. That is the reason it is used. I have only see
Dear,
Its not possible for the two routers having the same Loop back...
Loopback/Ip-Address must be unique whenever we talk about Public addresses.
Faisal Athar.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Group,
I am studying for my BSCN and am starting on my journey into BGP
(luckily I left a
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey Group,
> I am studying for my BSCN and am starting on my journey into BGP
> (luckily I left a trail of bread crumbs to get out) ;) What I'm saying is
> that for the next couple weeks you may see me asking more than the usual
> amoun
>
>
> I have one on the BGP Route Decision Process. In pages 168 & 169 of
>"Internet Routing Architectures," it gives the steps through attributes it
>takes when deciding between multiple routes to a destination. I wont list all
>of them but if you have the book you know what I'm talking
Shouldn't the BGP session itself never have been formed - with a duplicate
Router ID error being the cause. Error code 2 (OPEN error) subcode 3 (bad
BGP identifier) would be the notification message sent.
I can't confirm this, but it would seem to be the most logical protocol
design choice. For
7 matches
Mail list logo
